Conditional Manipulation of Sex Ratios by Ant Workers: A Test of Kin Selection Theory

Variable queen mating frequencies provide a unique opportunity to study the resolution of worker-queen conflict over sex ratio in social Hymenoptera, because the conflict is maximal in colonies headed by a singly mated queen and is weak or nonexistent in colonies headed by a multiply mated queen. In the wood ant Formica exsecta, workers in colonies with a singly mated queen, but not those in colonies with a multiply mated queen, altered the sex ratio of queen-laid eggs by eliminating males to preferentially raise queens. By this conditional response to queen mating frequency, workers enhance their inclusive fitness.

[1]  J. Sivinski.  Book Review: Evolution of Social Insect Colonies: Sex Allocation and Kin Selection. , 1997 .

[2]  L. Keller.  Social evolution in ants , 1996 .

[3]  L. Keller,et al.  Queen number influences the primary sex ratio in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (= Iridomyrmex humilis ) , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  J. Evans,et al.  Relatedness threshold for the production of female sexuals in colonies of a polygynous ant, Myrmica tahoensis, as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Boomsma.  Facultative Sex Allocation by Workers and the Evolution of Polyandry by Queens in Social Hymenoptera , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Liselotte Sundström,et al.  Sex Allocation and Colony Maintenance in Monogyne and Polygyne Colonies of Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): The Impact of Kinship and Mating Structure , 1995 .

[7]  S. Aron,et al.  Primary and secondary sex ratios in monogyne colonies of the fire ant , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Queen‐worker conflict over sex ratio: A comparison of primary and secondary sex ratios in the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis , 1994 .

[9]  J. Strassmann,et al.  A selfish strategy of social insect workers that promotes social cohesion , 1993, Nature.

[10]  L. Keller,et al.  Phenotypic Basis of Reproductive Success in a Social Insect: Genetic and Social Determinants , 1993, Science.

[11]  D. L. Wrensch,et al.  Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio in Insects and Mites , 1992 .

[12]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Chaotic Stirring in a Tidal System , 1992, Science.

[13]  H. Kern Reeve,et al.  Conflict in single-queen hymenopteran societies : the structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species , 1992 .

[14]  U. Mueller.  Haplodiploidy and the Evolution of Facultative Sex Ratios in a Primitively Eusocial Bee , 1991, Science.

[15]  M. J. Dijken.  A cytological method to determine primary sex ratio in the solitary parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi , 1991 .

[16]  R. Wiedenmann,et al.  Searching behavior and time budgets of the predator Podisus maculiventris , 1991 .

[17]  F. Ratnieks.  FACULTATIVE SEX ALLOCATION BIASING BY WORKERS IN SOCIAL HYMENOPTERA , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  P. Pamilo.  Evolution of Colony Characteristics in Social Insects. I. Sex Allocation , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[19]  J. J. Boomsma,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN ANT SEX RATIOS AND THE TRIVERS‐HARE HYPOTHESIS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  F. Ratnieks.  Assessment of queen mating frequency by workers in social hymenoptera , 1990 .

[21]  P. Nonacs.  Ant Reproductive Strategies and Sex Allocation Theory , 1986, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[22]  E. Robin,et al.  Intracellular edema and dehydration: effects on energy metabolism in alveolar macrophages. , 1976, Science.

[23]  R. Trivers,et al.  Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect. , 1976, Science.

[24]  C. Brooke Worth,et al.  The Insect Societies , 1973 .

[25]  L. Sundström.  Sex ratio bias, relatedness asymmetry and queen mating frequency in ants , 1994, Nature.