Dynamic transmission power control based on exact sea surface movement modeling in underwater acoustic sensor networks

Prediction of sea surface movement can be an important tool for the estimation of time-variant acoustic channel because signal attenuation caused by reflection occupies a large proportion in path loss. Although a number of researches have proposed resource allocation schemes based on the channel modeling, they did not consider reflection loss and time-variant characteristic. This paper suggests a transmission power control based on the prediction of time-variant channel by using the RMS (Root Mean Square) wave-height for low power consumption and stable throughput. The proposed scheme adopts transfer function including reflection coefficient overlooked in other papers using the Kirchhoff approximation. In addition, it defines the transmission power needed to guarantee a pre-specified SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) threshold using the transfer function. The BELLHOP and WAFO simulators were utilized to build simulation environment similar to actual ocean. The simulation results show that the proposed method is practical by considering the reflection impact on the power control and reduces energy consumption by 32.79% compared with the existing methods which do not use the adaptive power control based on channel condition.

[1]  E. Thorsos,et al.  Acoustic scattering from a ‘‘Pierson–Moskowitz’’ sea surface , 1989 .

[2]  Ying-Tsong Lin,et al.  Acoustic Ducting, Reflection, Refraction, and Dispersion by Curved Nonlinear Internal Waves in Shallow Water , 2010, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[3]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Rodney F. W. Coates,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Systems , 1990 .

[5]  P. K. Taylor,et al.  The Dependence of Sea Surface Roughness on the Height and Steepness of the Waves , 2001 .

[6]  Deane A model for the horizontal directionality of breaking wave noise in the surf zone , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[8]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On Joint Frequency and Power Allocation in a Cross-Layer Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2010 .

[9]  Huifang Chen,et al.  Toward Practical MAC Design for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[10]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Statistical Characterization and Computationally Efficient Modeling of a Class of Underwater Acoustic Communication Channels , 2013, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[11]  M. Colin,et al.  Simulation of an Underwater Acoustic Communication Channel Characterized by Wind-Generated Surface Waves and Bubbles , 2012, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[12]  Shira L. Broschat,et al.  The small slope approximation reflection coefficient for scattering from a "Pierson-Moskowitz" sea surface , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[14]  Alec J. Duncan,et al.  Modelling the acoustic reflection loss at the rough ocean surface , 2009 .

[15]  Cengis Hasan,et al.  2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob) , 2013 .