A Comparison of Estimators for the Two-Point Correlation Function.

Nine of the most important estimators known for the two-point correlation function are compared using a predetermined, rigorous criterion. The indicators were extracted from over 500 subsamples of the Virgo Hubble volume simulation cluster catalog. The "real" correlation function was determined from the full survey in a 3000 h(-1) Mpc periodic cube. The estimators were ranked by the cumulative probability of returning a value within a certain tolerance of the real correlation function. This criterion takes into account bias and variance, and it is independent of the possibly non-Gaussian nature of the error statistics. As a result, for astrophysical applications, a clear recommendation has emerged: the Landy & Szalay estimator, in its original or grid version (Szapudi & Szalay), is preferred in comparison with the other indicators examined, with a performance almost indistinguishable from the Hamilton estimator.

[1]  K. Pearson,et al.  Biometrika , 1902, The American Naturalist.

[2]  B. Ripley.  The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes , 1976 .

[3]  D. Stoyan,et al.  On the Second‐Order and Orientation Analysis of Planar Stationary Point Processes , 1981 .

[4]  P. Hewett,et al.  The estimation of galaxy angular correlation functions , 1982 .

[5]  J. Ohser,et al.  On estimators for the reduced second moment measure of point processes , 1983 .

[6]  Marc Davis,et al.  A survey of galaxy redshifts. V. The two-point position and velocity correlations. , 1983 .

[7]  U. Schulze.  Math.operationsforsch.u.statist.,ser.statist , 1984 .

[8]  A. R. Rivolo.  The two-point galaxy correlation function of the local supercluster , 1986 .

[9]  L. Heinrich,et al.  Asymptotic gaussianity of some estimators for reduced factorial moment measures and product densities of stationary poisson cluster processes , 1988 .

[10]  Thomas Fiksel,et al.  Edge-corrected density estimators for point processes , 1988 .

[11]  B. Ripley.  Statistical inference for spatial processes , 1990 .

[12]  A. Szalay,et al.  Bias and variance of angular correlation functions , 1993 .

[13]  A. Hamilton.  Toward Better Ways to Measure the Galaxy Correlation Function , 1993 .

[14]  J. Peacock,et al.  Power spectrum analysis of three-dimensional redshift surveys , 1993, astro-ph/9304022.

[15]  H. Wendrock,et al.  Estimation variances for estimators of product densities and pair correlation functions of planar point processes , 1993 .

[16]  G. Bernstein.  The Variance of Correlation Function Estimates , 1994 .

[17]  Cosmic Error and Statistics of Large-Scale Structure , 1995, astro-ph/9510030.

[18]  T. Mattfeldt.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .

[19]  A. Szalay,et al.  Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Eigenmode Analysis of Galaxy Redshift Surveys I. Theory and Methods , 1996 .

[20]  A. Szalay,et al.  A New Class of Estimators for the N-Point Correlations , 1997, astro-ph/9704241.

[21]  Effects of Sampling on Statistics of Large Scale Structure , 1997, astro-ph/9711087.

[22]  Scale-invariance of galaxy clustering , 1997, astro-ph/9711073.

[23]  S. Colombi,et al.  Cosmic statistics of statistics , 1999, astro-ph/9912289.

[24]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Comparing Estimators of the Galaxy Correlation Function , 1999 .

[25]  Is bootstrap really helpful in point process statistics? , 1999, math/0002061.

[26]  A. Hamilton.  Uncorrelated modes of the non-linear power spectrum , 1999, astro-ph/9905191.

[27]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Estimating and Choosing: An Essay on Probability in Practice , 2012 .