Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective

Abstract During the last few years, government institutions and agencies around the world have been adopting Open Government Data (OGD) initiatives to achieve political, social, economic, cultural and institutional benefits. This study aims to investigate the motivational factors for adopting OGD among government institutions in Saudi Arabia. A qualitative research approach was used to guide the research and the data was collected using interviews and documentation. The results of the study are interpreted and explained using elements from institutional theory. It shows that the adoption of OGD is influenced by existing institutional arrangements, and that the institutional changes that are occurring in the country such as the Saudi Vision 2030, the approval of the Freedom of information Act 2016, and anti-corruption campaigns have contributed positively to the transition from culture of secrecy to openness. In addition, the initiative is influenced by internal and external institutional pressures. Furthermore, the organizations studied perceived several benefits, which can be described as rationalized myths of the OGD such as transparency and accountability, better access to government data, support for innovation, improved government services, operational benefits and encouragement of participation. Based on the findings, the study provides some theoretical and practical implications regarding OGD adoption in government sittings.

[1]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Barriers to open data release: A view from the top , 2014, Inf. Polity.

[2]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[3]  Maureen Henninger,et al.  Reforms to counter a culture of secrecy: Open government in Australia , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[5]  Hui-Ju Wang,et al.  Adoption of open government data among government agencies , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Nicolau Reinhard,et al.  Open Government Data: Facilitating and Motivating Factors for Coping with Potential Barriers in the Brazilian Context , 2014, EGOV.

[8]  N. Huijboom,et al.  Open data: An International comparison of strategies , 2011 .

[9]  Akemi Takeoka Chatfield,et al.  Sharing Government-Owned Data with the Public: A Cross-Country Analysis of Open Data Practice in the Middle East , 2012, AMCIS.

[10]  Sören Auer,et al.  A systematic review of open government data initiatives , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[13]  H. Turunen,et al.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. , 2013, Nursing & health sciences.

[14]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data , 2011, Int. J. Web Eng. Technol..

[15]  Wei-Na Shi,et al.  The adoption of internet banking: An institutional theory perspective , 2008 .

[16]  Sian Barber,et al.  Institutions and Organisations , 2013 .

[17]  Lyudmila Bershadskaya,et al.  Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Peter Parycek,et al.  Open Government Data Implementation Evaluation , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[19]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[20]  Caroline Chan,et al.  Open data adoption in Australian government agencies: an exploratory study , 2016, ACIS.

[21]  Bo Fan,et al.  Exploring open government data capacity of government agency: Based on the resource-based theory , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti,et al.  Exploring the economic value of open government data , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[24]  Karin Hedström,et al.  The story of the sixth myth of open data and open government , 2015 .

[25]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies' open data publication: A study in Taiwan , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[28]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[29]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Social Media for Government: A Practical Guide to Understanding, Implementing, and Managing Social Media Tools in the Public Sphere , 2017 .

[31]  Mohammed Altayar,et al.  Investigating the Use of Web 2.0 Technologies and their Presence in Saudi Government Agencies' Websites , 2016, Int. J. Technol. Diffusion.

[32]  F. Bjorck,et al.  Institutional theory: a new perspective for research into IS/IT security in organisations , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[33]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Open Government Data: A Stage Model , 2011, EGOV.

[34]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  On the barriers for local government releasing open data , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[36]  Zhenbin Yang,et al.  Innovation in Government Services: The Case of Open Data , 2013, TDIT.

[37]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real world research : a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings , 2011 .

[38]  JanssenMarijn,et al.  Special issue on innovation through open data: a review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda , 2014 .

[39]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[40]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  M. Janssen,et al.  Barriers and Development Directions for the Publication and Usage of Open Data: A Socio-Technical View , 2014 .

[42]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data , 2015, J. Inf. Sci..