Financial Volatility Modeling with the GARCH-MIDAS-LSTM Approach: The Effects of Economic Expectations, Geopolitical Risks and Industrial Production during COVID-19

Forecasting stock markets is an important challenge due to leptokurtic distributions with heavy tails due to uncertainties in markets, economies, and political fluctuations. To forecast the direction of stock markets, the inclusion of leading indicators to volatility models is highly important; however, such series are generally at different frequencies. The paper proposes the GARCH-MIDAS-LSTM model, a hybrid method that benefits from LSTM deep neural networks for forecast accuracy, and the GARCH-MIDAS model for the integration of effects of low-frequency variables in high-frequency stock market volatility modeling. The models are being tested for a forecast sample including the COVID-19 shut-down after the first official case period and the economic reopening period in in Borsa Istanbul stock market in Türkiye. For this sample, significant uncertainty existed regarding future economic expectations, and the period provided an interesting laboratory to test the forecast effectiveness of the proposed LSTM augmented model in addition to GARCH-MIDAS models, which included geopolitical risk, future economic expectations, trends, and cycle industrial production indices as low-frequency variables. The evidence suggests that stock market volatility is most effectively modeled with geopolitical risk, followed by industrial production, and a relatively lower performance is achieved by future economic expectations. These findings imply that increases in geopolitical risk enhance stock market volatility further, and that industrial production and future economic expectations work in the opposite direction. Most importantly, the forecast results suggest suitability of both the GARCH-MIDAS and GARCH-MIDAS-LSTM models, and with good forecasting capabilities. However, a comparison shows significant root mean squared error reduction with the novel GARCH-MIDAS-LSTM model over GARCH-MIDAS models. Percentage decline in root mean squared errors for forecasts are between 39% to 95% in LSTM augmented models depending on the type of economic indicator used. The proposed approach offers a key tool for investors and policymakers.

[1]  M. Bildirici,et al.  Forecasting BDI Sea Freight Shipment Cost, VIX Investor Sentiment and MSCI Global Stock Market Indicator Indices: LSTAR-GARCH and LSTAR-APGARCH Models , 2023, Mathematics.

[2]  S. Raza,et al.  Forecasting the volatility of precious metals prices with global economic policy uncertainty in pre and during the COVID-19 period: Novel evidence from the GARCH-MIDAS approach , 2023, Energy Economics.

[3]  Esteban Alfaro Cortés,et al.  Role of proliferation COVID-19 media chatter in predicting Indian stock market: Integrated framework of nonlinear feature transformation and advanced AI , 2023, Expert Systems with Applications.

[4]  Rangan Gupta,et al.  Forecasting stock market volatility with regime-switching GARCH-MIDAS: The role of geopolitical risks , 2023, International Journal of Forecasting.

[5]  R. Majhi,et al.  Are Twitter sentiments during COVID-19 pandemic a critical determinant to predict stock market movements? A machine learning approach , 2022, Scientific African.

[6]  J. Liu,et al.  How do stock prices respond to the leading economic indicators? Analysis of large and small shocks , 2022, Finance Research Letters.

[7]  Nawa Raj Pokhrel,et al.  Predicting stock market index using LSTM , 2022, Machine Learning with Applications.

[8]  Chen Yang,et al.  Identifying the Determinants of Crude Oil Market Volatility by the Multivariate GARCH-MIDAS Model , 2022, Energies.

[9]  Gülsüm Mert,et al.  Are the Policy Uncertainty and CLI ‘Effective’ Indicators of Volatility? GARCH-MIDAS Analysis of the G7 Stock Markets , 2022, ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH.

[10]  Mahinda Mailagaha Kumbure,et al.  Machine learning techniques and data for stock market forecasting: A literature review , 2022, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Huayou Chen,et al.  A combination forecasting model based on hybrid interval multi-scale decomposition: Application to interval-valued carbon price forecasting , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  L. Petrella,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Energy Commodities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Mixed-Frequency Approach , 2021, Risks.

[13]  Mu-Yen Chen,et al.  A deep learning approach for financial market prediction: utilization of Google trends and keywords , 2021, Granular Computing.

[14]  Liu Wen,et al.  A hybrid deep learning approach by integrating LSTM-ANN networks with GARCH model for copper price volatility prediction , 2020, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[15]  M. Bildirici,et al.  Analyzing Crude Oil Prices under the Impact of COVID-19 by Using LSTARGARCHLSTM , 2020, Energies.

[16]  Ahmet Murat Ozbayoglu,et al.  Financial Time Series Forecasting with Deep Learning : A Systematic Literature Review: 2005-2019 , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[17]  Wei Shang,et al.  Text-based crude oil price forecasting: A deep learning approach , 2019, International Journal of Forecasting.

[18]  Ha Young Kim,et al.  Improving financial trading decisions using deep Q-learning: Predicting the number of shares, action strategies, and transfer learning , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Ha Young Kim,et al.  Forecasting the volatility of stock price index: A hybrid model integrating LSTM with multiple GARCH-type models , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Christian Conrad,et al.  Long- and Short-Term Cryptocurrency Volatility Components: A GARCH-MIDAS Analysis , 2018 .

[21]  Yaohao Peng,et al.  The best of two worlds: Forecasting high frequency volatility for cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies with Support Vector Regression , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Ankit Pandey,et al.  Crude Oil Price Prediction Using LSTM Networks , 2018 .

[23]  Luigi Troiano,et al.  Replicating a Trading Strategy by Means of LSTM for Financial Industry Applications , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[24]  Matteo Iacoviello,et al.  Measuring Geopolitical Risk , 2018, International Finance Discussion Papers.

[25]  Jianping Li,et al.  A deep learning ensemble approach for crude oil price forecasting , 2017 .

[26]  Okyay Kaynak,et al.  Rough Deep Neural Architecture for Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[27]  Nicolas Huck,et al.  Deep neural networks, gradient-boosted trees, random forests: Statistical arbitrage on the S&P 500 , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Pedro Correia S. Bezerra,et al.  Volatility forecasting via SVR–GARCH with mixture of Gaussian kernels , 2017, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[29]  Christian Conrad,et al.  Anticipating Long-Term Stock Market Volatility: ANTICIPATING LONG-TERM STOCK MARKET VOLATILITY , 2015 .

[30]  A. Timmermann,et al.  A Bayesian MIDAS Approach to Modeling First and Second Moment Dynamics , 2014 .

[31]  Eric Ghysels,et al.  Stock Market Volatility and Macroeconomic Fundamentals , 2013, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[32]  Laurent Ferrara,et al.  Financial variables as leading indicators of GDP growth: Evidence from a MIDAS approach during the Great Recession , 2013 .

[33]  Melike Bildirici,et al.  Support Vector Machine GARCH and Neural Network GARCH Models in Modeling Conditional Volatility: An Application to Turkish Financial Markets , 2012 .

[34]  Massimiliano Marcellino,et al.  Midas Vs. Mixed-Frequency VAR: Nowcasting GDP in the Euro Area , 2009 .

[35]  Melike Bildirici,et al.  Improving forecasts of GARCH family models with the artificial neural networks: An application to the daily returns in Istanbul Stock Exchange , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  E. Ghysels,et al.  MIDAS Regressions: Further Results and New Directions , 2006 .

[37]  George Kapetanios,et al.  Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework , 2003 .

[38]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Learning to Forget: Continual Prediction with LSTM , 2000, Neural Computation.

[39]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory , 1997, Neural Computation.

[40]  P. Schmidt,et al.  On the Power of the KPSS Test of Stationarity Against Fractionally-Integrated Alternatives , 1996 .

[41]  T. Teräsvirta Specification, Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models , 1994 .

[42]  J. Stock,et al.  Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root , 1992 .

[43]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[44]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , 1986 .

[45]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[46]  Xiaoxi Liu,et al.  Gjr-Garch Midas Model Based Analyse Geopolitical Risk and Energy Price Volatility , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[47]  Kexian Zhang,et al.  Forecasting crude oil price using LSTM neural networks , 2022, Data Science in Finance and Economics.

[48]  Jason C. Hung,et al.  Exploring the effectiveness of deep neural networks with technical analysis applied to stock market prediction , 2021, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Melike Bildirici,et al.  Examination of the predictability of BDI and VIX: a threshold approach , 2019 .

[50]  Mirco Fabbri,et al.  Dow Jones Trading with Deep Learning: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Recurrent Neural Networks , 2018, DATA.

[51]  Yanhui Chen,et al.  Forecasting Crude Oil Prices: a Deep Learning based Model , 2017, ITQM.

[52]  M. Bildirici,et al.  ASYMMETRIC POWER AND FRACTIONALLY INTEGRATED SUPPORT VECTOR AND NEURAL NETWORK GARCH MODELS WITH AN APPLICATION TO FORECASTING FINANCIAL RETURNS IN ISE100 STOCK INDEX , 2014 .

[53]  Lean Yu,et al.  A Rough-Set-Refined Text Mining Approach for Crude Oil Market Tendency Forecasting , 2005 .

[54]  R. Donaldson,et al.  An artificial neural network-GARCH model for international stock return volatility , 1997 .