When cycle paths are not enough: Seville's bicycle-PT project

The city of Seville (Spain) has been named the fourth most “bicycle-friendly city” in the world, mainly due to the building of a segregated network of bicycle paths which, in a few years, substantially increased utilitarian cycling in the city. However, recent bicycle counts along the network have shown that the volume of cycling is now levelling off at around 6% of the city’s mobility (9% of all mechanised trips); a meaningful level but still far from the figures that are usual in leading cycling cities. This stagnation suggests that new actions are needed in order to further develop urban cycling and overcome bottlenecks that prevent its growth, perhaps by integrating cycling policies into wider sustainable mobility and traffic calming policies. Among these actions, improving links between bicycles and public transport (PT) could play a significant role. This is the subject of the Bicycle-PT research project that is currently being developed by the authors at the University of Seville and founded by the Regional Government. The main aim of this project is to diagnose present links and to evaluate the potential market for bicycle-PT intermodality in the entire metropolitan area, as well as to make specific proposals for its development. For this purpose, the authors use a geographic information system (GIS) based methodology, combined with information provided by mobility and opinion surveys.

[1]  Ricardo Marqués,et al.  Sevilla: A Successful Experience of Bicycle Promotion in a Mediterranean Context , 2014 .

[2]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The accessibility of railway stations: the role of the bicycle in The Netherlands , 2000 .

[3]  Martin Dijst,et al.  Multimodal Trips in the Netherlands: Microlevel Individual Attributes and Residential Context , 2001 .

[4]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[5]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Modelling the Joint Access Mode and Railway Station Choice , 2007 .

[6]  Alastair M. Morrison,et al.  Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Lisa Aultman-Hall,et al.  Analysis of Bicycle Commuter Routes Using Geographic Information Systems: Implications for Bicycle Planning , 1997 .

[8]  Ruud Hegger,et al.  Public Transport and Cycling: Living Apart or Together? , 2007 .

[9]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Development of a Multi-class Bicyclist Route Choice Model Using Revealed Preference Data , 2009 .

[10]  Lisa Aultman-Hall,et al.  Innovative Data Collection for Pedestrians, Bicycles, and Other Non-Motor Vehicle Modes , 2012 .

[11]  Changshan Wu,et al.  Bicycle facility planning using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis , 2010 .

[12]  K. Krizek,et al.  Bicycling and Transit: A Marriage Unrealized , 2010 .

[13]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Bicycle Integration with Public Transport , 2012 .

[14]  Karel Martens,et al.  The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries , 2004 .

[15]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Much-Anticipated Marriage of Cycling and Transit , 2011 .

[16]  Karel Martens,et al.  Promoting Bike-and-Ride: The Dutch Experience , 2007 .

[17]  P. Rietveld,et al.  Acces to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use , 2009 .

[18]  Stacey Guzman,et al.  China's Hangzhou Public Bicycle , 2011 .

[19]  J. Dekoster,et al.  Cycling : the way ahead for towns and cities , 1999 .

[20]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Multimodal public transport: an analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio , 2004 .