Verbal and Cognitive Distractors in Driving Performance While Using Hands-Free Phones

This study investigated the effect of different types of distractions related to use of a hands-free phone on driving performance. The study used three types of verbal distractors: casual conversation, simple arithmetic number guessing, and number adding, in the phone conversation. 12 adults were instructed to follow a lead vehicle on a closed-course highway in a fixed-based driving simulator. The results showed that use of a hands-free cellular phone involving verbal and cognitive distractions impaired driving performance and skill. Types of distraction produced significantly different effects on several dependent variables: the driving speed, headway (distance between the lead car and the manipulated car), brake reaction time, and number of collisions with the lead car. In general, the higher the cognitive load involved in the dialogue, the worse the driving performance.

[1]  P A Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  D. Heathcote.  The role of visuo-spatial working memory in the mental addition of multi-digit addends. , 1994 .

[3]  D. E Haigney,et al.  Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes , 2000 .

[4]  A.J. Kames.  A study of the effects of mobile telephone use and control unit design on driving performance , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[6]  W. Berg,et al.  Effect of the Intensity of Wireless Telephone Conversations on Reaction Time in a Braking Response , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  Fokie Cnossen,et al.  Adaptive strategy changes as a function of task demands: a study of car drivers , 2004, Ergonomics.

[8]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Albert Kircher,et al.  Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Kristen E Beede,et al.  Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Fürst Aj,et al.  The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. , 1998 .

[12]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Michael E Rakauskas,et al.  Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[14]  Matthew Witte,et al.  Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Jan E B Törnros,et al.  Mobile phone use-effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Valdimar Briem,et al.  Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. , 1995 .

[18]  H Alm,et al.  The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  N. Osaka,et al.  Susceptibility of spatial and verbal working memory to demands of the central executive. , 2004, The Japanese psychological research.