Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammaticality judgments of garden path sentences

Abstract This study investigated whether single or multiple structures are constructed at the level of syntactic analysis for ambiguous strings. To this end, three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of various types of snytactic and nonsyntactic information on grammaticality judgments for garden path sentences. The results of Experiment 1, using a speeded grammaticality judgment task, were that context and length of the ambiguous region influenced the probability of calling a garden path sentence grammatical. In Experiment 2, even when given unlimited time to make grammaticality judgments, 40% of all long garden path sentences that required a less preferred analysis were called ungrammatical. Experiment 3 extended the length effects found in Experiments 1 and 2 to some additional types of garden path sentences. The results support a parsing model that is influenced by context and that constructs only a single interpretation of an ambiguous string at a time.

[1]  M. Kutas,et al.  Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation ☆ ☆☆ , 1987 .

[2]  Robert William Milne,et al.  Predicting Garden Path Sentences , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Language as a Cognitive Process , 1983, CL.

[4]  Howard Steven Kurtzman,et al.  Studies in syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1985 .

[5]  Mary Dee Harris Introduction to Natural Language Processing , 1984 .

[6]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[8]  C. Clifton,et al.  Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[9]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[10]  B. Kintz,et al.  Computational Handbook of Statistics , 1968 .

[11]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Lexical Expectations in Sentence Comprehension. , 1984 .

[12]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .

[13]  John I. Kiger,et al.  The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .