Systems biology for cancer

Purpose of review Significant insight can be gained into complex biologic mechanisms of cancer via a combined computational and experimental systems biology approach. This review highlights some of the major systems biology efforts that were applied to cancer in the past year. Recent findings Two main approaches to computational systems biology are discussed: mechanistic dynamical simulations and inferential data mining. Significant developments have occurred in both areas. For example, mechanistic simulations of the EGFR pathway are promoting understanding of cancer, and Bayesian inference approaches allow for the reconstruction of regulatory networks. In addition, the article reports on advancements in experimental systems biology for determining protein-protein interactions and quantifying protein expression to generate the necessary data for computational modeling and inferential data mining. Emerging approaches will further improve the ability to bridge the gap between in vitro systems and in vivo human biology. Technologies paving the way include in vitro models that better reflect in vivo tumors, microfabricated devices of human physiology, and improved animal models. Summary An important challenge facing the field is how better to translate in vitro discoveries to the clinic. Computational systems biology approaches that use omic data to predict biology along with novel experimental systems that better represent human in vivo biology will prove useful in bridging this gap. Although still early, the potential application of systems biology and the future evolution of the field will significantly affect understanding of cancer disease mechanisms and the ability to devise effective therapeutics.

[1]  H. Kitano Cancer as a robust system: implications for anticancer therapy , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Proteomics: the first decade and beyond , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Hong Wang,et al.  Protein profiles associated with survival in lung adenocarcinoma , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  K. S. Brown,et al.  Statistical mechanical approaches to models with many poorly known parameters. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  John J Tyson,et al.  A model for restriction point control of the mammalian cell cycle. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.

[8]  R. Christopher,et al.  Data‐Driven Computer Simulation of Human Cancer Cell , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  H. Wiley,et al.  An integrated model of epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking and signal transduction. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[10]  U. Alon Biological Networks: The Tinkerer as an Engineer , 2003, Science.

[11]  William F. Loomis,et al.  Periodic Signaling Controlled by an Oscillatory Circuit That Includes Protein Kinases ERK2 and PKA , 2004, Science.

[12]  Emanuel F Petricoin,et al.  Clinical applications of proteomics. , 2003, The Journal of nutrition.

[13]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[14]  Jeffrey S. Morris,et al.  Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments , 2004, Bioinform..

[15]  Uri Alon,et al.  Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[16]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Blasting into the Microworld of Tissue Proteomics: A New Window on Cancer , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  M. O'hare,et al.  Three-dimensional in vitro tissue culture models of breast cancer — a review , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  Aaron Sin,et al.  Development of a Microscale Cell Culture Analog To Probe Naphthalene Toxicity , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[19]  J. Paulsson Summing up the noise in gene networks , 2004, Nature.

[20]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Inferring Cellular Networks Using Probabilistic Graphical Models , 2004, Science.

[21]  William C Reinhold,et al.  Proteomic profiling of the NCI-60 cancer cell lines using new high-density reverse-phase lysate microarrays , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Zhilin Qu,et al.  Regulation of the mammalian cell cycle: a model of the G1-to-S transition. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[23]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[24]  R. Milo,et al.  Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein-protein interaction. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  H. Steven Wiley,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of HER 2-mediated Effects on HER 2 and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Endocytosis DISTRIBUTION OF HOMO-AND HETERODIMERS DEPENDS ON RELATIVE HER 2 LEVELS * , 2003 .