Upper bound on the success probability of separation among quantum states

Quantum state separation is a more general operation for identifying states than unambiguous discrimination. In this paper, we derive an upper bound on the success probability of separation among n states with arbitrary a priori probabilities, extending some of the important results given in the literature. This conclusion generalizes that obtained by Chefles and Barnett for separating two states having equal a priori probabilities. Some of the known bounds on the success probabilities of unambiguous discrimination such as the Ivanovic–Dieks–Peres limit, the more general limit by Jaeger and Shimony, and an upper bound for the case of unambiguously discriminating n states, are special cases of our results. Notably, we also give implicitly a different method to derive the upper bound on the probability of successful unambiguous discrimination among n states. Finally, we apply our conclusion to quantum cloning and then derive some upper bounds on the success probabilities for several probabilistic cloning machines.

[1]  C. Helstrom Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1969 .

[2]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.

[3]  Horace P. Yuen,et al.  Amplification of quantum states and noiseless photon amplifiers , 1986 .

[4]  I. D. Ivanović How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states , 1987 .

[5]  D. Dieks Overlap and distinguishability of quantum states , 1988 .

[6]  A. Peres How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states , 1988 .

[7]  A. Shimony,et al.  Optimal distinction between two non-orthogonal quantum states , 1995 .

[8]  Massar,et al.  Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[9]  Buzek,et al.  Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[10]  S. Massar,et al.  Optimal Quantum Cloning Machines , 1997, quant-ph/9705046.

[11]  G. Guo,et al.  Probabilistic Cloning and Identification of Linearly Independent Quantum States , 1998, quant-ph/9804064.

[12]  V. Buzek,et al.  Universal Algorithm for Optimal Estimation of Quantum States from Finite Ensembles via Realizable Ge , 1997, quant-ph/9707028.

[13]  S. Barnett,et al.  Optimum unambiguous discrimination between linearly independent symmetric states , 1998, quant-ph/9807023.

[14]  Daniel R. Terno,et al.  Optimal distinction between non-orthogonal quantum states , 1998, quant-ph/9804031.

[15]  D. Bruß,et al.  Optimal Universal Quantum Cloning and State Estimation , 1997, quant-ph/9712019.

[16]  S. Barnett,et al.  Quantum state separation, unambiguous discrimination and exact cloning , 1998, quant-ph/9808018.

[17]  G. Guo,et al.  GENERAL STRATEGIES FOR DISCRIMINATION OF QUANTUM STATES , 1999, quant-ph/9908001.

[18]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state , 2000, Nature.

[19]  Anthony Chefles Quantum state discrimination , 2000 .

[20]  J. Bergou,et al.  Optimum unambiguous discrimination between linearly independent nonorthogonal quantum states and its optical realization , 2000, quant-ph/0012131.

[21]  Anthony Chefles Unambiguous discrimination between linearly dependent states with multiple copies , 2001, quant-ph/0105016.

[22]  Shengyu Zhang,et al.  Upper bound for the success probability of unambiguous discrimination among quantum states , 2001 .

[23]  Anthony Chefles Quantum operations, state transformations and probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0109060.

[24]  Daowen Qiu Some analogies between quantum cloning and quantum deleting , 2002 .

[25]  Combinations of probabilistic and approximate quantum cloning and deleting , 2002 .