Towards Accurate Age Determination of Greenland Halibut

Based on tag-recapture experiments, this paper shows that previous age determinations of Northeast Atlantic Greenland halibut from whole otolith surfaces greatly underestimates the age of older individuals. It also shows that the mean individual annual growth of adults is slightly below one cm per year. Surface methods are much more effective than other more time-intensive methods, which is an important consideration for use in stock assessment. The paper describes a new surface method that is in accordance with growth increments from tag-recaptures. The method relies on improved protocols relating to storing, imaging, choice of reading axis, and definition of annuli. The definitions of the first two annuli were validated by length frequencies of juveniles. The new reading axis and annuli of older otoliths were validated by tagging experiments involving injection of OTC, a chemical tag that incorporates into the otolith as a visual band marking the otolith size at time of release. With the new method, several measures of otolith size were correlated with age after correcting for fish length. This is expected for an accurate age determination method and was not apparent with the traditional method.

[1]  A. Folkvord,et al.  Section 2: Estimation of fish age and growth , 2000 .

[2]  Vijai Singh,et al.  On the use of otoliths for the determination of age and growth ofAnguilla nebulosa nebulosa McClelland , 1962, Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences.

[3]  D. Secor,et al.  Somatic Growth Effects on the Otolith–Fish Size Relationship in Young Pond-reared Striped Bass, Morone saxatilis , 1989 .

[4]  M. Cardinale,et al.  Potential use of otolith weight for the determination of age-structure of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) , 2000 .

[5]  C. Papaconstantinou,et al.  Comparison of otolith growth and somatic growth in two macrourid fishes , 2000 .

[6]  Cho Jh,et al.  Growth and longevity in acanthurid fishes; an analysis of otolith increments , 1996 .

[7]  J. Gregg,et al.  Improving the precision of otolith-based age estimates for Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) with preparation methods adapted for fragile sagittae , 2006 .

[8]  S. Campana,et al.  Graphical and Statistical Methods for Determining the Consistency of Age Determinations , 1995 .

[9]  M. Treble,et al.  Report of the Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) Age Determination Workshop , 2008 .

[10]  W. R. Bowering,et al.  Age validation and growth of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides (Walbaum)): A comparison of populations in the Northwest and Northeast Atlantic , 2001 .

[11]  Å. Høines,et al.  Rebuilding the Stock of Northeast Arctic Greenland Halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) , 2008 .

[12]  J. Boje,et al.  Growth analysis and age validation of a deepwater Arctic fish, the Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) , 2008 .

[13]  D. Gunderson,et al.  Natural mortality rate, annual fecundity, and maturity at length for Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides)from the northeastern Pacific Ocean , 2007 .

[14]  G. Pilling,et al.  The utility of otolith weight as a predictor of age in the emperor Lethrinus mahsena and other tropical fish species , 2003 .

[15]  J. Shenker,et al.  Using otolith morphometrics to quickly and inexpensively predict age in the gray angelfish (Pomacanthus arcuatus) , 2009 .

[16]  R. Beamish,et al.  Selection of Dosages of Oxytetracycline for Age Validation Studies , 1987 .

[17]  C. Davies,et al.  Using otolith weight–age relationships to predict age-based metrics of coral reef fish populations at different spatial scales , 2005 .

[18]  D. Reznick,et al.  Slower Growth Results in Larger Otoliths: An Experimental Test with Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 1989 .

[19]  G. Boehlert.  USING OBJECTIVE CRITERIA AND MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODELS FOR AGE DETERMINATION IN FISHES , 1985 .

[20]  A. Fowler,et al.  Variation in the relationship between otolith weight and age: implications for the estimation of age of two tropical damselfish (Pomacentrus moluccensis and P. wardi) , 1995 .

[21]  M. Pawson.  Using otolith weight to age fish , 1990 .

[22]  S. Campana,et al.  Stock Discrimination Using Otolith Shape Analysis , 1993 .

[23]  Å. Høines,et al.  Greenland halibut observed by video in front of survey trawl: behaviour, escapement, and spatial pattern , 2003 .

[24]  S. Campana,et al.  Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods , 2001 .

[25]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Image processing, the fundamentals , 2001 .

[26]  C. Stransky,et al.  Age determination and growth of Atlantic redfish (Sebastes marinus and S. mentella): bias and precision of age readers and otolith preparation methods , 2005 .

[27]  R. Summerfelt,et al.  Age and growth of fish , 1988 .

[28]  Alexander Sasov,et al.  Fish ageing by otolith shape analysis : Final report to the European Commission , 2002 .

[29]  J. Reinert,et al.  Intercalibration of age readings of ling (Molva molva L.) blue ling (Molva dipterygia Pennant, 1784) and tusk (Brosme brosme L.) , 1998 .

[30]  Daniel K. Kimura,et al.  Between-Reader Bias and Variability in the Age-Determination Process , 1991 .

[31]  I. F. West,et al.  Movement of water in fish otoliths , 1998 .

[32]  Peter J. Wright,et al.  Otolith and somatic growth rates in Atlantic salmon parr, Salmo salar L: evidence against coupling , 1990 .

[33]  H. Svedäng,et al.  Uncoupling of Somatic and Otolith Growth Rates in Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) as an Effect of Differences in Temperature Response , 1988 .

[34]  I. Fossen,et al.  Improving the precision of ageing assessments for long rough dab by using digitised pictures and otolith measurements , 2003 .