An approach to estimating the individual risk for toxic-gas releases using the load-resistance model

Abstract A new approach to quantify the uncertainty of the individual risk for toxic releases is presented in this paper. The individual risk is defined as the probability of fatality per year. The probability of fatality is calculated by a classical load-resistance model based on reliability (survivability) theory. The load effect is defined as the concentration intensity to which a human is exposed. Furthermore, the resistance is defined as the human tolerance to a certain concentration load in this study. The Monte Carlo method is used to obtain the probability distributions of outputs (the load effect and resistance) propagated from the uncertainties of the input variables. The fatality probability exceeding a limit state can then be obtained by comparing pairs of samples from the load effect and the resistance distributions. The separation of sampling from the load and resistance distributions is also proposed to allow more efficient calculation than that achieved by the classical Monte Carlo method. The analytical risk estimates computed by the load-resistance model are compared to conventional risk estimates that correspond to the upper-end percentile of the load-effect distribution. A case study shows that the conventional risk estimates can be directed to wrong decisions when the load-effect distribution has upper-end tail heaviness.

[1]  Ulrich Hauptmanns,et al.  A risk-based approach to land-use planning. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  C. I. Bliss.  THE CALCULATION OF THE DOSAGE-MORTALITY CURVE , 1935 .

[3]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  electronic resource.  Guidelines for evaluating process plant buildings for external explosions and fire , 2013 .

[5]  Nicolás J. Scenna,et al.  STRRAP system - A software for hazardous materials risk assessment and safe distances calculation , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Michalis Christou,et al.  Risk Assessment In Support To Land-Use Planning In Europe: Towards More Consistent Decisions? , 2011 .

[7]  Simon Schubach.  A measure of human sensitivity in acute inhalation toxicity , 1997 .

[8]  Rosemary T Zaleski,et al.  Assessment of chemical coexposure patterns based upon phthalate biomonitoring data within the 2007/2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey , 2015, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[9]  Thomas Fetz.  Modelling uncertainties in limit state functions , 2012, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[10]  D E Burmaster,et al.  Principles of good practice for the use of Monte Carlo techniques in human health and ecological risk assessments. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Ccps.  Guidelines for Facility Siting and Layout , 2003 .

[12]  J. Vrijling,et al.  An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  A. Yegnan,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in air dispersion modeling , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  S. Hanna,et al.  Monte carlo estimates of uncertainties in predictions by a photochemical grid model (UAM-IV) due to uncertainties in input variables , 1998 .

[15]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Past, present and future of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from Land-Use Planning (LUP) , 2014 .

[16]  M. Piringer,et al.  Use of a Monte Carlo technique to complete a fragmented set of H2S emission rates from a wastewater treatment plant. , 2013, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  B Mitchell,et al.  Use of the most likely failure point method for risk estimation and risk uncertainty analysis. , 2002, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  M.A. Maes,et al.  Tail effects of uncertainty modeling in QRA , 1995, Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society.

[19]  Jerry Havens,et al.  Field test validation of the degadis model , 1987 .

[20]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications , 2001 .

[21]  Il Moon,et al.  Public Protection Integrated Program Development for Chemical and Radiological Disasters , 2014 .

[22]  Ramesh J. Patel.  Risk Based Inspection , 2005 .

[23]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Separable Sampling of the Limit State for Accurate Monte Carlo Simulation , 2009 .

[24]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Conservative versus Mean Risk Assessments: Implications for Superfund Policies , 1997 .

[25]  G Sassi,et al.  Quantitative estimation of uncertainty in human risk analysis. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[26]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Optimal facility layout under toxic release in process facilities: A stochastic approach , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[27]  P H Bottelberghs.  Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherlands. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Guest editorial: treatment of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems , 1996 .

[29]  Nicolás J. Scenna,et al.  Road risk analysis due to the transportation of chlorine in Rosario city , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  D. Sullivan,et al.  Monte Carlo-based dispersion modeling of off-gassing releases from the fumigant metam-sodium for determining distances to exposure endpoints , 2004 .

[31]  Ccps.  Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[32]  Dedy Ng,et al.  An approach for risk reduction (methodology) based on optimizing the facility layout and siting in toxic gas release scenarios , 2010 .

[33]  M Sam Mannan,et al.  Incident analysis of Bucheon LPG filling station pool fire and BLEVE. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[34]  Simon Schubach.  Comparison of probit expressions for the prediction of lethality due to toxic exposure , 1995 .