A study on quality-adjusted impact of time lapse on iris recognition

Although human iris pattern is widely accepted as a stable biometric feature, recent research has found some evidences on the aging effect of iris system. In order to investigate changes in iris recognition performance due to the elapsed time between probe and gallery iris images, we examine the effect of elapsed time on iris recognition utilizing 7,628 iris images from 46 subjects with an average of ten visits acquired over two years from a legacy database at Clarkson University. Taken into consideration the impact of quality factors such as local contrast, illumination, blur and noise on iris recognition performance, regression models are built with and without quality metrics to evaluate the degradation of iris recognition performance based on time lapse factors. Our experimental results demonstrate the decrease of iris recognition performance along with increased elapsed time based on two iris recognition system (the modified Masek algorithm and a commercial software VeriEye SDK). These results also reveal the significance of quality factors in iris recognition regression indicating the variability in match scores. According to the regression analysis, our study in this paper helps provide the quantified decrease on match scores with increased elapsed time, which indicates the possibility to implement the prediction scheme for iris recognition performance based on learning of impact on time lapse factors.

[1]  Hiroshi Nakajima,et al.  An Effective Approach for Iris Recognition Using Phase-Based Image Matching , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  F. Alonso-Fernandez,et al.  On the Effects of Time Variability in Iris Recognition , 2008, 2008 IEEE Second International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems.

[3]  John Daugman,et al.  How iris recognition works , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[4]  Stephanie Schuckers,et al.  Impact of out-of-focus blur on face recognition performance based on modular transfer function , 2012, 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB).

[5]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Correct Iris Match Score Degradation with Increased Time-Lapse between Gallery and Probe Matches , 2009, ICB.

[6]  Elham Tabassi,et al.  Performance of Biometric Quality Measures , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Edward Sazonov,et al.  Impact of out-of-focus blur on iris recognition , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  E. Peli Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Kevin W. Bowyer,et al.  Experimental evidence of a template aging effect in iris biometrics , 2011, 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[10]  Wayne J. Salamon,et al.  IREX II - IQCE :: iris quality calibration and evaluation : performance of iris image quality assessment algorithms , 2011 .