Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows

Locomotion in 36 cows was tested on five different surfaces: solid and slatted concrete with and without 20 mm thick elastic (KEN 1 ) rubber mats and wet, compressed sand (as an example of a natural, yielding surface). The friction of the floors was measured and a trackway measurement system (measurements from footprints) was used for analysis of locomotion. The presence and severity of lameness was scored subjectively. The slatted, crude concrete floor was found to have the lowest coefficient of friction (0.31), the solid, crude concrete floor had a higher friction coefficient (0.58) and rubber mats had an intermediate friction value (0.46). In comparison with the sand surface the cows walked more slowly on the slatted, crude concrete floor, with considerably shortened strides and with the rear feet placed at greater distance behind the front ones. On the solid, crude concrete floor the cows took shorter strides and steps than on the sand surface, but the speed did not differ significantly. Elastic rubber mats on the solid as well as on the slatted concrete floor increased the length of strides and steps. In comparison with non-lame and mildly lame cows, moderately lame animals walked more slowly and had a shorter stride and step length. Analyses within each lameness degree revealed that the moderately lame cows walked with a significantly smaller step angle (which corresponds to a wider posture) on crude solid and slatted concrete in comparison with both the continuous and the slatted rubber floor. The moderately lame cows walked on the rubber mats with roughly the same step angle as on the sand surface. Comparisons of cows with different

[1]  Henrik Åström Utvärdering av PFT som friktionsmätare för vägmarkeringsytor , 2000 .

[2]  N. Cook Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. , 2003, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[3]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Constrained standing: Evaluating the foot/floor interface , 1991 .

[4]  M S Redfern,et al.  Measurement of slipperiness: fundamental concepts and definitions , 2001, Ergonomics.

[5]  Sarah Hassall,et al.  Effects of lameness on the behaviour of cows during the summer , 1993, Veterinary Record.

[6]  T. Uetake,et al.  Can we really walk straight? , 1992, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  D. Boelling,et al.  Locomotion, lameness, hoof and leg traits in cattle II. , 1998 .

[8]  N. G. Webb,et al.  Flooring and injury--an overview , 1983 .

[9]  NG Gregory,et al.  Dairy cow preference for a soft track surface , 2002, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[10]  K. Lundström,et al.  The influence of breed, age, body weight and season on digital diseases and hoof size in dairy cows. , 2010, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.

[11]  D. Sprecher,et al.  A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. , 1997, Theriogenology.

[12]  G. Gustafson Effects of daily exercise on the health of tied dairy cows , 1993 .

[13]  F. Manson,et al.  Epidemiology of lameness in dairy cattle: description and analysis of foot lesions , 1996, Veterinary Record.

[14]  H. Whay,et al.  Associations between locomotion, claw lesions and nociceptive threshold in dairy heifers during the peri-partum period. , 1997, Veterinary journal.

[15]  C. Bergsten,et al.  Sole Haemorrhages in Tied Primiparous Cows as an Indicator of Periparturient Laminitis: Effects of Diet, Flooring and Season , 1996, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[16]  C. Bergsten,et al.  Sole Haemorrhages and Heel Horn Erosion in Dairy Cows: The Influence of Housing System on their Prevalence and Severity , 1996, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[17]  Rodger Kram,et al.  Energetics of running: a new perspective , 1990, Nature.

[18]  S Drevemo,et al.  Investigating locomotion of dairy cows by use of high speed cinematography. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[19]  H. Wierenga,et al.  Cattle housing systems, lameness and behaviour , 1987 .

[20]  Stolze,et al.  Retest reliability of spatiotemporal gait parameters in children and adults. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[21]  C. Phillips,et al.  The locomotion of dairy cows on floor surfaces with different frictional properties. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  Jan Hultgren,et al.  Prevalence and interrelationships of hoof lesions and lameness in Swedish dairy cows. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  E. Raven Cattle Footcare and Claw Trimming , 1985 .

[24]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[25]  C. Phillips,et al.  The locomotion of dairy cows on concrete floors that are dry, wet, or covered with a slurry of excreta. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  A. Fraser,et al.  Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare , 1990 .

[27]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1: Friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions , 2001, Ergonomics.

[28]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices , 2001, Ergonomics.

[29]  J. Somers,et al.  Claw disorders and disturbed locomotion in dairy cows: the effect of floor systems and implications for animal welfare , 1993 .