Co-location of activities and designations: A means of solving or creating problems in marine spatial planning?

Worldwide demand for energy is growing and predicted to increase by up to three times by 2050. Renewable energy will play a vital role in meeting this demand whilst maintaining global climate change targets. Around the British Isles, development of wind farms has entered Round three, with large, high capacity wind parks being planned to enhance energy security and achieve 2020 renewable energy targets. Such developments place additional pressure on existing sea space and may result in conflicts with other marine activities and users. Co-location of certain activities, marine protected areas, aquaculture and commercial fishing in particular, has therefore been proposed as an option to ease demands on space. Using the UK guided by EU and regional policy, as a case study, following the criteria-based planning system, co-location is legally feasible. Crucially, co-location options will depend on site specific characteristics and site management plans. The biology, ecology and hydrology of the site as well as consideration of important commercial and economic factors will be determining factors of success. For marine protected areas compatibility with conservation objectives for the site will be fundamental. Where possible, it is suggested that activities suitable for co-location will develop in tandem with renewable energy projects. The importance of developing joint projects in this manner is particularly true for aquaculture projects to ensure tenure security and commercial viability. Adaptive management will be a basis for evolution of the concept and practice of co-location. Pilot projects and continued monitoring will be essential in shaping the future of co-location of activities. As the Marine Management Organisation continues the development of marine plans for the English inshore and offshore waters, a study into potential solutions for resolving sea use conflicts is timely. This paper therefore provides a concise overview of the current regulation affecting co-location of key marine activities within wind farm zones and provides suggestions on how co-location projects can be adopted and taken forward, using the UK as a case study.

[1]  M. Elliott.  Marine science and management means tackling exogenic unmanaged pressures and endogenic managed pressures--a numbered guide. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[2]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  Marine management--towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[3]  Peter J S Jones,et al.  Marine protected areas in the UK: challenges in combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to governance , 2012, Environmental Conservation.

[4]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Growth performance and condition of oysters (Crassostrea gigas and Ostrea edulis) farmed in an offshore environment (North Sea, Germany) , 2011 .

[5]  M. Kaiser,et al.  Rigs-to-Reef Programs in the Gulf of Mexico , 2005 .

[6]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? , 2010 .

[7]  T. Michler-Cieluch,et al.  Perceived concerns and possible management strategies for governing 'wind farm-mariculture integration' , 2008 .

[8]  K. Davidson,et al.  Culture, yield and bioremediation potential of Palmaria palmata (Linnaeus) Weber Mohr and Saccharina latissima (Linnaeus) C.E. Lane, C. Mayes, Druehl G.W. Saunders adjacent to fish farm cages in northwest Scotland , 2012 .

[9]  Friedrich Buchholz,et al.  A mark-recapture study of hatchery-reared juvenile European lobsters, Homarus gammarus, released at the rocky island of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea) from 2000 to 2009 , 2011 .

[10]  L. Lewis,et al.  Birds, seals and the suspension culture of mussels in Bantry Bay, a non-seaduck area in Southwest Ireland , 2004 .

[11]  B. Martínez,et al.  Open sea cultivation of Palmaria palmata (Rhodophyta) on the northern Spanish coast , 2006 .

[12]  L. Mee.  Complementary Benefits of Alternative Energy: Suitability of Offshore Wind Farms as Aquaculture Sites , 2006 .

[13]  B. Beal,et al.  Survival and growth of hatchery-reared individuals of the European lobster, Homarus gammarus (L.), in field-based nursery cages on the Irish west coat , 2002 .

[14]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  PREFERENCES OF COASTAL ZONE USER GROUPS REGARDING THE SITING OF OFFSHORE WIND FARMS , 2009 .

[15]  R. Lifran,et al.  The case for offshore wind farms, artificial reefs and sustainable tourism in the French mediterranean , 2013 .

[16]  C. Johnson,et al.  Experimental reseeding of juvenile spiny lobsters (Jasus edwardsii): Comparing survival and movement of wild and naïve lobsters at multiple sites , 2006 .

[17]  Michael Elliott,et al.  The Habitat-Creation Potential of Offshore Wind Farms , 2009, Renewable Energy.

[18]  Wanfei Qiu,et al.  The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe , 2013 .

[19]  W. Watson,et al.  A self-contained system for observing and quantifying the behavior of Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, in an offshore aquaculture cage , 2009 .

[20]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Coastal and Offshore Wind Energy Generation: Is It Environmentally Benign? , 2010 .

[21]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Farming in a high energy environment: potentials and constraints of sustainable offshore aquaculture in the German Bight (North Sea) = Chancen und Limitierungen extensiver Offshore-Aquakultur in der Deutschen Bucht , 2004 .

[22]  Paul Todd.  Marine renewable energy and public rights , 2012 .

[23]  P. Leung,et al.  Economics of offshore aquaculture of Pacific threadfin (Polydactylus sexfilis) in Hawaii , 2003 .

[24]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: the prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints , 2004 .

[25]  David W. Fredriksson,et al.  The physics of open-water shellfish aquaculture , 2008 .