Gradient-Based Source and Mask Optimization in Optical Lithography

Source and mask optimization (SMO) has been proposed recently as an effective solution to extend the lifespan of conventional 193 nm lithography, although the process is computationally intensive. In this study, we propose a highly effective and efficient method for source optimization and improve a previous method for mask optimization. An SMO framework is implemented by integrating them. Based on pixel-based source and mask representation, the gradients of the objective function are utilized to guide optimization. In addition to maintain the image fidelity, extra penalties are added into the objective function to increase the depth of focus (DOF) and regularize the source and mask patterns. In our SMO framework, a specially designed mask optimization procedure is performed to enhance the algorithm robustness. Afterward, the source optimization and mask optimization are performed alternatively. Convergence results can be acquired using only two or three iteration cycles. This method is demonstrated using two mask patterns with critical dimensions of 45 nm, including a periodic array of contact holes and a cross gate design. The results show that our method can provide great improvements in both image quality and DOF. The robustness of our method is also verified using different initial conditions.

[1]  Oscar Noordman,et al.  Generation of arbitrary freeform source shapes using advanced illumination systems in high-NA immersion scanners , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Phase-shifting masks for microlithography: automated design and mask requirements , 1994 .

[3]  Will Conley,et al.  Layout and source dependent transmission tuning , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  M. Levenson,et al.  Improving resolution in photolithography with a phase-shifting mask , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[5]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  OPC and PSM design using inverse lithography: a nonlinear optimization approach , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  D. Fehrs,et al.  Illuminator modification of an optical aligner , 2004 .

[7]  Vladimir S. Pavelyev,et al.  Novel continuously shaped diffractive optical elements enable high efficiency beam shaping , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Oscar Noordman,et al.  Performance of FlexRay: a fully programmable illumination system for generation of freeform sources on high NA immersion systems , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Xu Ma,et al.  Binary mask optimization for inverse lithography with partially coherent illumination , 2008, Lithography Asia.

[10]  Chris A. Mack Optimum stepper performance through image manipulation , 2004 .

[11]  Wei Xiong,et al.  A robust pixel-based RET optimization algorithm independent of initial conditions , 2010, 2010 15th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC).

[12]  Robert Socha,et al.  Simultaneous source mask optimization (SMO) , 2005, Photomask Japan.

[13]  Yuri Granik,et al.  Solving inverse problems of optical microlithography , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Xu Ma,et al.  PSM design for inverse lithography with partially coherent illumination , 2008, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Vikram Tolani,et al.  Source-mask co-optimization (SMO) using level set methods , 2009, Photomask Technology.

[16]  Jared D. Stack,et al.  Advances in DOE modeling and optical performance for SMO applications , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[17]  Kafai Lai,et al.  Optimum mask and source patterns to print a given shape , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Lawrence S. Melvin,et al.  Abbe-PCA-SMO: microlithography source and mask optimization based on Abbe-PCA , 2009, Lithography Asia.

[19]  Bahaa E. A. Saleh,et al.  Reduction Of Errors Of Microphotographic Reproductions By Optimal Corrections Of Original Masks , 1981 .

[20]  Amyn Poonawala,et al.  Mask Design for Optical Microlithography—An Inverse Imaging Problem , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  G. Arce,et al.  Pixel-based simultaneous source and mask optimization for resolution enhancement in optical lithography. , 2009, Optics express.

[22]  Wei Xiong,et al.  A highly efficient optimization algorithm for pixel manipulation in inverse lithography technique , 2008, 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design.