Effects of spatial frequency bands on perceptual decision: it is not the stimuli but the comparison.

Observers performed three between- and two within-category perceptual decisions with hybrid stimuli comprising low and high spatial frequency (SF) images. We manipulated (a) attention to, and (b) congruency of information in the two SF bands. Processing difficulty of the different SF bands varied across different categorization tasks: house-flower, face-house, and valence decisions were easier when based on high SF bands, while flower-face and gender categorizations were easier when based on low SF bands. Larger interference also arose from response relevant distracters that were presented in the "preferred" SF range of the task. Low SF effects were facilitated by short exposure durations. The results demonstrate that decisions are affected by an interaction of task and SF range and that the information from the non-attended SF range interfered at the decision level. A further analysis revealed that overall differences in the statistics of image features, in particular differences of orientation information between two categories, were associated with decision difficulty. We concluded that the advantage of using information from one SF range over another depends on the specific task requirements that built on the differences of the statistical properties between the compared categories.

[1]  A. Harel,et al.  Stimulus type, level of categorization, and spatial-frequencies utilization: implications for perceptual categorization hierarchies. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Robust Object Detection with Interleaved Categorization and Segmentation , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  L. Itti,et al.  Search Goal Tunes Visual Features Optimally , 2007, Neuron.

[5]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  Channel surfing in the visual brain , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Francesc S. Beltran,et al.  Face perception: An integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies , 2006, Psychological research.

[7]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Sanja Fidler,et al.  Hierarchical Statistical Learning of Generic Parts of Object Structure , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[9]  Philippe G. Schyns,et al.  Retinotopic sensitisation to spatial scale: Evidence for flexible spatial frequency processing in scene perception , 2006, Vision Research.

[10]  Charles A Collin,et al.  Spatial-Frequency Thresholds for Object Categorisation at Basic and Subordinate Levels , 2006, Perception.

[11]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of human inferior temporal cortex during coarse-to-fine and fine-to-coarse analysis of natural visual scenes , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  Philippe G. Schyns,et al.  Top-down attentional modulation of spatial frequency processing in scene perception , 2005 .

[13]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  The coarse-to-fine hypothesis revisited: Evidence from neuro-computational modeling , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  Charles A. Collin,et al.  Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain , 2004, Nature.

[17]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Scale invariant adaptation in fusiform face-responsive regions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Expectancy effects on spatial frequency processing , 2003, Vision Research.

[19]  B A J Reddi,et al.  Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision task. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Näsänen,et al.  Utilisation of spatial frequency information in face search , 2003, Vision Research.

[21]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Effects of Low-Spatial Frequency Components of Fearful Faces on Fusiform Cortex Activity , 2003, Current Biology.

[22]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  ERP evidence for task modulations on face perceptual processing at different spatial scales , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Flutter Discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  S Shipp,et al.  Corticopulvinar connections of areas V5, V4, and V3 in the macaque monkey: A dual model of retinal and cortical topographies , 2001, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[29]  P. Schyns,et al.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  Victor A. F. Lamme Blindsight: the role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical connections. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[32]  A. Oliva,et al.  Diagnostic Colors Mediate Scene Recognition , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  B. Skottun,et al.  The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: the evidence from contrast sensitivity , 2000, Vision Research.

[34]  R. Näsänen Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.

[35]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Nicholas Costen,et al.  One extreme or the other or perhaps the golden mean? Issues of spatial resolution in face processing , 1999 .

[37]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[38]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.

[39]  D. Field,et al.  Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes , 1997, Vision Research.

[40]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  A. Oliva,et al.  Flexible, Diagnosticity-Driven, Rather Than Fixed, Perceptually Determined Scale Selection in Scene and Face Recognition , 1997, Perception.

[42]  S. Zeki,et al.  Segregation and convergence of specialised pathways in macaque monkey visual cortex. , 1995, Journal of anatomy.

[43]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[45]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[46]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[47]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[48]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[49]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Diagnostic use of scale information for componential and holistic recognition. , 2003 .

[50]  J. Bullier,et al.  The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons. , 2001, Progress in brain research.