A checkpoints capturing timing-robust Boolean model of the budding yeast cell cycle regulatory network

BackgroundCell cycle process of budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) consists of four phases: G1, S, G2 and M. Initiated by stimulation of the G1 phase, cell cycle returns to the G1 stationary phase through a sequence of the S, G2 and M phases. During the cell cycle, a cell verifies whether necessary conditions are satisfied at the end of each phase (i.e., checkpoint) since damages of any phase can cause severe cell cycle defect. The cell cycle can proceed to the next phase properly only if checkpoint conditions are met. Over the last decade, there have been several studies to construct Boolean models that capture checkpoint conditions. However, they mostly focused on robustness to network perturbations, and the timing robustness has not been much addressed. Only recently, some studies suggested extension of such models towards timing-robust models, but they have not considered checkpoint conditions.ResultsTo construct a timing-robust Boolean model that preserves checkpoint conditions of the budding yeast cell cycle, we used a model verification technique, ‘model checking’. By utilizing automatic and exhaustive verification of model checking, we found that previous models cannot properly capture essential checkpoint conditions in the presence of timing variations. In particular, such models violate the M phase checkpoint condition so that it allows a division of a budding yeast cell into two before the completion of its full DNA replication and synthesis. In this paper, we present a timing-robust model that preserves all the essential checkpoint conditions properly against timing variations. Our simulation results show that the proposed timing-robust model is more robust even against network perturbations and can better represent the nature of cell cycle than previous models.ConclusionsTo our knowledge this is the first work that rigorously examined the timing robustness of the cell cycle process of budding yeast with respect to checkpoint conditions using Boolean models. The proposed timing-robust model is the complete state-of-the-art model that guarantees no violation in terms of checkpoints known to date.

[1]  Marco Pistore,et al.  Nusmv version 2: an opensource tool for symbolic model checking , 2002, CAV 2002.

[2]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Kinetic analysis of a molecular model of the budding yeast cell cycle. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  François Fages,et al.  Modelling and querying interaction networks in the biochemical abstract machine BIOCHAM , 2002 .

[4]  Madalena Chaves,et al.  Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  L. Hood,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity , 2007 .

[6]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Serial Regulation of Transcriptional Regulators in the Yeast Cell Cycle , 2001, Cell.

[7]  D Kindelberger,et al.  Cell cycle-regulated transcription of the CLB2 gene is dependent on Mcm1 and a ternary complex factor , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[8]  Radek Pelánek,et al.  Fighting State Space Explosion: Review and Evaluation , 2009, FMICS.

[9]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Forkhead transcription factors, Fkh1p and Fkh2p, collaborate with Mcm1p to control transcription required for M-phase , 2000, Current Biology.

[10]  Jesper Tegnér,et al.  Decoding complex biological networks - tracing essential and modulatory parameters in complex and simplified models of the cell cycle , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[11]  F. Cross,et al.  Forced periodic expression of G1 cyclins phase-locks the budding yeast cell cycle , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  A methodology for the structural and functional analysis of signaling and regulatory networks , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[13]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Dynamical analysis of a generic Boolean model for the control of the mammalian cell cycle , 2006, ISMB.

[14]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  Robustness under Functional Constraint: The Genetic Network for Temporal Expression in Drosophila Neurogenesis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Jie Liu,et al.  Prediction of quantitative phenotypes based on genetic networks: a case study in yeast sporulation , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[17]  H. Kitano Towards a theory of biological robustness , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[18]  Laurence Calzone,et al.  Temporal organization of the budding yeast cell cycle: general principles and detailed simulations , 2003 .

[19]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[20]  T. Helikar,et al.  Emergent decision-making in biological signal transduction networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Superstability of the yeast cell-cycle dynamics: ensuring causality in the presence of biochemical stochasticity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Minping Qian,et al.  Stochastic model of yeast cell-cycle network , 2006, q-bio/0605011.

[23]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Genetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a logical analysis , 1999, Bioinform..

[24]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  A new role for MCM1 in yeast: cell cycle regulation of SW15 transcription. , 1991, Genes & development.

[25]  Joshua E. S. Socolar,et al.  Global control of cell-cycle transcription by coupled CDK and network oscillators , 2008, Nature.

[26]  Kersti Kristjuhan,et al.  Uniform Distribution of Elongating RNA Polymerase II Complexes in Transcribed Gene Locus* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Helmut Veith,et al.  25 Years of Model Checking - History, Achievements, Perspectives , 2008, 25 Years of Model Checking.

[28]  Thomas A. Henzinger,et al.  Bounded Asynchrony: Concurrency for Modeling Cell-Cell Interactions , 2008, FMSB.

[29]  D. Larson What do expression dynamics tell us about the mechanism of transcription? , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[30]  Masao Nagasaki,et al.  Simulation-based model checking approach to cell fate specification during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development by hybrid functional Petri net with extension , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[31]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Integrative analysis of cell cycle control in budding yeast. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[32]  Guang Yao,et al.  Sensing and Integration of Erk and PI3K Signals by Myc , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  S. Bornholdt,et al.  Boolean Network Model Predicts Cell Cycle Sequence of Fission Yeast , 2007, PloS one.

[34]  D. Botstein,et al.  Two yeast forkhead genes regulate the cell cycle and pseudohyphal growth , 2000, Nature.

[35]  Béla Novák,et al.  Supplementary Fig. 1 , 2021 .

[36]  Hong Qian,et al.  Synchronized dynamics and non-equilibrium steady states in a stochastic yeast cell-cycle network. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences.

[37]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Eric A. Sobie,et al.  Computational Modeling of the Cell Cycle , 2011, Science Signaling.

[39]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Ilya Shmulevich,et al.  On Learning Gene Regulatory Networks Under the Boolean Network Model , 2003, Machine Learning.

[41]  Youyong Zhu,et al.  Genetic diversity and disease control in rice , 2000, Nature.

[42]  P. Lio’,et al.  Periodic gene expression program of the fission yeast cell cycle , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[43]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  A Logical Model Provides Insights into T Cell Receptor Signaling , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Giovanni De Micheli,et al.  Synchronous versus asynchronous modeling of gene regulatory networks , 2008, Bioinform..

[45]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[46]  L. Breeden,et al.  Early Cell Cycle Box-Mediated Transcription ofCLN3 and SWI4 Contributes to the Proper Timing of the G1-to-S Transition in Budding Yeast , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[47]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.

[49]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Mechanisms that help the yeast cell cycle clock tick: G2 cyclins transcriptionally activate G2 cyclins and repress G1 cyclins , 1993, Cell.

[51]  David L. Dill,et al.  Timing Robustness in the Budding and Fission Yeast Cell Cycles , 2010, PloS one.

[52]  Keijo Heljanko Model Checking the Branching Time Temporal Logic CTL , 1997 .

[53]  Shengchao Ding,et al.  Recipes and mechanisms of cellular reprogramming: a case study on budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[54]  D. Irons,et al.  Logical analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[55]  Masahiro Okamoto,et al.  Development of a System for the Inference of Large Scale Genetic Networks , 2000, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[56]  Masao Nagasaki,et al.  MIRACH: efficient model checker for quantitative biological pathway models , 2011, Bioinform..

[57]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Boolean network models of cellular regulation: prospects and limitations , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[58]  Bor-Sen Chen,et al.  A systematic molecular circuit design method for gene networks under biochemical time delays and molecular noises , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[59]  Ilya Shmulevich,et al.  Eukaryotic cells are dynamically ordered or critical but not chaotic. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  V. Thorsson,et al.  Discovery of regulatory interactions through perturbation: inference and experimental design. , 1999, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[61]  Satoru Miyano,et al.  Identification of Genetic Networks from a Small Number of Gene Expression Patterns Under the Boolean Network Model , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[62]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[63]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Computational studies of gene regulatory networks: in numero molecular biology , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[64]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Logical modelling and analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[65]  Thomas A. Henzinger,et al.  Qualitative networks: a symbolic approach to analyze biological signaling networks , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[66]  Andrea Ciliberto,et al.  Computational modelling of mitotic exit in budding yeast: the role of separase and Cdc14 endocycles , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[67]  Edmund M. Clarke,et al.  Model Checking , 1999, Handbook of Automated Reasoning.

[68]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Stable stochastic dynamics in yeast cell cycle. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[69]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.