The soil microbial community alters patterns of selection on flowering time and fitness‐related traits in Ipomoea purpurea

Premise of the study Plant flowering time plays an important role in plant fitness and thus evolutionary processes. Soil microbial communities are diverse and have a large impact, both positive and negative, on the host plant. However, owing to few available studies, how the soil microbial community may influence the evolutionary response of plant populations is not well understood. Here we sought to uncover if below-ground microbial communities act as an agent of selection on flowering and growth traits in the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Methods We performed a controlled greenhouse experiment in which genetic lines of I. purpurea were planted into either sterilized soils, or soils that were sterilized and re-inoculated with the microbial community from original field soil. This allowed us to directly test the influence of alterations to the microbial community on plant growth, flowering, and fitness, as well as assess patterns of selection in both soil microbial environments. Results We found that a more complex soil microbial community resulted in larger plants that produced more flowers. Selection strongly favored earlier flowering when plants were grown in the complex microbial environment than compared to sterilized soil. Additionally, we uncovered a pattern of negative correlational selection on growth rate and flowering time, indicating that selection favored different combinations of growth and flowering traits in the simplified versus complex soil community. Conclusions Together these results suggest the soil microbial community is a selective agent on flowering time and ultimately that soil microbial community influences important plant evolutionary processes.

[1]  J. Geml,et al.  Out of sight, but no longer out of mind - towards an increased recognition of the role of soil microbes in plant speciation. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[2]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[3]  E. Svensson,et al.  On the standardization of fitness and traits in comparative studies of phenotypic selection , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  B. Richardson,et al.  Will phenotypic plasticity affecting flowering phenology keep pace with climate change? , 2017, Global change biology.

[5]  Jinmi Yoon,et al.  The control of flowering time by environmental factors , 2017, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[6]  Alka Gupta,et al.  Microbiome Selection Could Spur Next-Generation Plant Breeding Strategies , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[7]  B. Blackman Changing Responses to Changing Seasons: Natural Variation in the Plasticity of Flowering Time1[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Physiology.

[8]  A. Classen,et al.  Root bacterial endophytes alter plant phenotype, but not physiology , 2016, PeerJ.

[9]  P. Zee,et al.  Eco‐evolutionary dynamics in plant–soil feedbacks , 2016 .

[10]  Crispin Y Jordan,et al.  When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering? , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[11]  S. Franks The unique and multifaceted importance of the timing of flowering. , 2015, American journal of botany.

[12]  P. Garbeva,et al.  Non-random species loss in bacterial communities reduces antifungal volatile production. , 2015, Ecology.

[13]  Classen,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of climate change on soil microbial and soil microbial‐plant interactions: What lies ahead? , 2015 .

[14]  J. Manners,et al.  Investigating the Association between Flowering Time and Defense in the Arabidopsis thaliana-Fusarium oxysporum Interaction , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  D. Nychka,et al.  A Multiresolution Gaussian Process Model for the Analysis of Large Spatial Datasets , 2015 .

[16]  Angela C. Poole,et al.  Selection on soil microbiomes reveals reproducible impacts on plant function , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[17]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[18]  R. Baucom,et al.  THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF TOLERANCE TO COMPETITION IN IPOMOEA PURPUREA, THE COMMON MORNING GLORY , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  S. Tringe,et al.  Natural soil microbes alter flowering phenology and the intensity of selection on flowering time in a wild Arabidopsis relative. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[20]  S. Scheu,et al.  Biodiversity and species identity shape the antifungal activity of bacterial communities. , 2014, Ecology.

[21]  J. Lennon,et al.  Rapid responses of soil microorganisms improve plant fitness in novel environments , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Lennon,et al.  Evolutionary ecology of plant-microbe interactions: soil microbial structure alters selection on plant traits. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[23]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Using knockout mutants to reveal the growth costs of defensive traits , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Meta-analysis of phenotypic selection on flowering phenology suggests that early flowering plants are favoured. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[25]  R. Amasino Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[26]  B. Lugtenberg,et al.  Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. , 2009, Annual review of microbiology.

[27]  P. Adler,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects of Climate Change on a Prairie Plant Community , 2009, PloS one.

[28]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Effect of gamma‐sterilization and autoclaving on soil organic matter structure as studied by solid state NMR, UV and fluorescence spectroscopy , 2008 .

[29]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[30]  D. Inouye,et al.  Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. , 2008, Ecology.

[31]  A. Biere,et al.  Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  S. Sim,et al.  Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to a climate fluctuation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  A. Sugden ECOLOGY/EVOLUTION: Phenotypic Plasticity , 2004 .

[34]  P. Garbeva,et al.  Microbial diversity in soil: selection microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. , 2004, Annual review of phytopathology.

[35]  P. Marschner,et al.  Rapid changes in the rhizosphere bacterial community structure during re-colonization of sterilized soil , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[36]  M. Hofman The brain's calendar: neural mechanisms of seasonal timing , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  James D. Bever,et al.  GRASSROOTS ECOLOGY: PLANT-MICROBE-SOIL INTERACTIONS AS DRIVERS OF PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS , 2003 .

[38]  J. Bever,et al.  Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[39]  M. Stanton,et al.  EVOLUTION IN STRESSFUL ENVIRONMENTS. I. PHENOTYPIC VARIABILITY, PHENOTYPIC SELECTION, AND RESPONSE TO SELECTION IN FIVE DISTINCT ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSES , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  R. Briddon,et al.  Ipomoea purpurea (Common morning glory) , 2019, Encyclopedia of Plant Viruses and Viroids.

[43]  K. Kazan,et al.  The link between flowering time and stress tolerance. , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.

[44]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[45]  E. Aschehoug,et al.  Fungal endophytes directly increase the competitive effects of an invasive forb. , 2012, Ecology.