Positive Dynamical Networks in Neuronal Regulation: How Tunable Variability Coexists With Robustness

Neuronal systems exhibit highly stable and tunable behaviors in spite of huge variability at the molecular component level and in spite of persistent physiological and pathological perturbations. How is this robust flexibility achieved? Homeostatic integral control has been shown to be key in reconciling variability with stability, but the explanatory model used lacks basic robustness properties to perturbations. We suggest that positive molecular regulatory networks may play a major role in reconciling stability, variability and robustness. The idea we propose is that integral control happens along the dominant direction of the network. This slow direction generates a strongly attractive, and thus robust, subspace along which almost perfect homeostatic regulation can be achieved. Fluctuations of relevant molecular variables along this positive dominant subspace explain how big, positively-correlated variations of biophysical parameters (as measured in experiments) are compatible with robust regulation, thus explaining flexibility. Because of robustness, the properties of the positive network can be subject to slower tuning processes (like the circadian rhythm), which provides a biologically plausible basis for tunable variability to be compatible with robust regulation. The relevance of the proposed regulation model for control-theoretical approaches to neurological diseases is also discussed.

[1]  D. McCormick,et al.  Sleep and arousal: thalamocortical mechanisms. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  D. Noutsos,et al.  On Perron–Frobenius property of matrices having some negative entries☆ , 2006 .

[3]  Rodolphe Sepulchre,et al.  A Balance Equation Determines a Switch in Neuronal Excitability , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Neil Fenichel Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations , 1979 .

[5]  Eve Marder,et al.  Cell Types, Network Homeostasis, and Pathological Compensation from a Biologically Plausible Ion Channel Expression Model , 2014, Neuron.

[6]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Ca2+ channel-regulated neuronal gene expression. , 1998, Journal of neurobiology.

[7]  E. Marder,et al.  A Model Neuron with Activity-Dependent Conductances Regulated by Multiple Calcium Sensors , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Rodolphe Sepulchre,et al.  Dynamic Input Conductances Shape Neuronal Spiking1,2 , 2015, eNeuro.

[9]  J. Golowasch,et al.  Ionic current correlations are ubiquitous across phyla , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Interaction sign patterns in biological networks: From qualitative to quantitative criteria , 2017, 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[11]  J. Golowasch,et al.  Adult mouse basal forebrain harbors two distinct cholinergic populations defined by their electrophysiology , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[12]  E. Marder,et al.  Neuromodulation of circuits with variable parameters: single neurons and small circuits reveal principles of state-dependent and robust neuromodulation. , 2014, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  M. Rosbash,et al.  Nascent-Seq reveals novel features of mouse circadian transcriptional regulation , 2012, eLife.

[14]  David Angeli,et al.  Monotone control systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  E. Marder,et al.  Global Structure, Robustness, and Modulation of Neuronal Models , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  E. Ruppin,et al.  Mitochondrial Regulation of the Hippocampal Firing Rate Set Point and Seizure Susceptibility , 2019, Neuron.

[17]  Timothy O’Leary,et al.  Neuronal homeostasis: time for a change? , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  E. Marder,et al.  Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Khammash,et al.  Antithetic Integral Feedback Ensures Robust Perfect Adaptation in Noisy Biomolecular Networks. , 2016, Cell systems.

[20]  Jean-Marc Goaillard,et al.  Quantitative expression profiling of identified neurons reveals cell-specific constraints on highly variable levels of gene expression , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Golowasch Neuromodulation of central pattern generators and its role in the functional recovery of central pattern generator activity. , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.