GENE FREQUENCY IN SMALL POPULATIONS OF MUTANT DROSOPHILA

Studies of gene frequency changes in laboratory populations have for the most part been concerned with the systematic effects of selection and with discovery of the nature of the selective differences involved between genetic alternatives. The classical experiments of L'Heritier and Teissier (1934, 1937) with common mutants, the later work of Dobzhansky (Wright and Dobzhansky 1946), and that of Wallace (1948) on naturally occurring genetic variants are examples of such studies applied to rather large populations maintained in population cages of the sort developed by L'Heritier and Teissier (1933). Such experiments as these were carried out under conditions in which changes in gene frequency due to sampling accidents (random drift) were negligible. In the work of Reed and Reed (1948, 1950), Ludwin (1951) and Merrell (1953) on selective differences between mutants and wild type, non-systematic effects of considerable magnitude and attributable to accidents of sampling occurred; however, these data did not permit a close evaluation of the extent of this influence. An experimental design in which both random and systematic pressures are brought into play in an orderly fashion and the values of the several theoretical parameters can be ascertained was originated by Kerr (Kerr and Wright, 1954). The method consists in observations on the changes in gene frequency between generations in each of a large number of small cultures in which the size of the breeding population is controlled. Each initial culture founds a line in which each successive generation is inititated with a random sample of uniform size taken from among the flies of the preceding generation. The form is that of a fairly large experimental population divided into a number of very small completely isolated subunits. The present study was intended to provide information on the relative selective values of two mutant autosomal alleles and their several zygotic types under several different experimental conditions and to observe the effect of the interaction of selection and random drift on the distribution of gene frequencies among the elements of subdivided populations of the sort observed by Kerr.

[1]  S. Wright,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENE FREQUENCIES IN VERY SMALL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. II. BAR , 1954 .

[2]  S. Wright,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENE FREQUENCIES IN VERY SMALL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. III. ARISTAPEDIA AND SPINELESS , 1954 .

[3]  J. H. Sang The Ecological Determinants of Population Growth in a Drosophila Culture. IV. The Significance of Successive Batches of Larvae , 1949, Physiological Zoology.

[4]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[5]  H. Slatis Position Effects at the Brown Locus in Drosophila Melanogaster. , 1955, Genetics.

[6]  J. H. Sang The Ecological Determinants of Population Growth in a Drosophila Culture. III. Larval and Pupal Survival , 1949, Physiological Zoology.

[7]  D. J. Merrell GENE FREQUENCY CHANGES IN SMALL LABORATORY POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1953 .

[8]  B. Wallace STUDIES ON “SEX–RATIO” IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. I. SELECTION AND “SEX–RATIO” , 1948, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[10]  Sewall Wright,et al.  Statistical genetics in relation to evolution , 1939 .

[11]  S Wright,et al.  The Differential Equation of the Distribution of Gene Frequencies. , 1945, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  N. Morton,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF GENE FREQUENCY DRIFT IN SMALL POPULATIONS , 1955 .

[13]  I. Ludwin NATURAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS , 1951 .

[14]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[15]  M Kimura,et al.  SOLUTION OF A PROCESS OF RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT WITH A CONTINUOUS MODEL. , 1955, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  E. W. Reed,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION IN LABORATORY POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA. II. COMPETITION BETWEEN A WHITE‐EYE GENE AND ITS WILD TYPE ALLELE , 1950 .

[17]  Sewall Wright,et al.  Statistical genetics and evolution , 1942 .

[18]  S. Wright,et al.  Genetics of Natural Populations. Xii. Experimental Reproduction of Some of the Changes Caused by Natural Selection in Certain Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. , 1946, Genetics.

[19]  E. W. Reed,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION IN LABORATORY POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA , 1948, Genetics.