Interceptive action: What's time-to-contact got to do with it?

Abstract The time remaining before an object arrives somewhere — its time-to-contact (TTC) with that place — is a quantity could be used to control the timing of interceptive and evasive actions directed at that object. This potential use for TTC information is the primary motivation for studying how people and animals perceive it. However, studies of interceptive actions and the role TTC information might play in controlling them have been very limited until recently — studies of the perceptual process of TTC estimation have been more popular. Unfortunately, TTC perception depends upon the task being performed and it seems impossible to understand TTC perception without understanding interceptive tasks. This chapter argues this case and discusses recent experiments that have attempted to determine how performance of interceptive actions-particularly their timing-depends upon task variables including the speed of the target, the distance to be moved to intercept it, the viewing time, the size of the target and of the intercepting manipulandum. Results demonstrate that the duration and velocity of interceptive movements are systematically and consistently affected by all these variables. The relationship between movement duration and the task variables derived from experimental results is interpreted as an empirical reflection of the ‘rule’ used by the central nervous system to preprogram movement duration. The role of TTC in the programming and initiation of interceptive movements is explicated.

[1]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  The perceptual guidance of grasping a moving object , 1992 .

[2]  John P. Wann,et al.  Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[4]  B J McFadyen,et al.  Visuomotor control when reaching toward and grasping moving targets. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Marc H. E. de Lussanet de la Sablonière The control of interceptive arm movements , 2002 .

[6]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Hitting moving objects , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[8]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[9]  C. Michaels,et al.  Information and action in punching a falling ball , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating Ball , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  Frank T. J. M. Zaal,et al.  Dynamics of reaching for stationary and moving objects: Data and Model , 1999 .

[12]  R. Gellman,et al.  Control strategies in directing the hand to moving targets , 1992, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[15]  Scott M. Dittman,et al.  Monocular optical constraints on collision control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[17]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[18]  J Paillard,et al.  Fast and slow feedback loops for the visual correction of spatial errors in a pointing task: a reappraisal. , 1996, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[19]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Revised tau hypothesis : A consideration of Wann's (1996) analyses , 1997 .

[20]  R Plamondon,et al.  Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  Phillip J. Bairstow,et al.  Analysis of hand movement to moving targets , 1987 .

[22]  M. Laurent,et al.  Perception-action coupling in an interceptive task: First-order time-to-contact as an input variable , 2000 .

[23]  Daniel Mestre,et al.  Catching balls: How to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994 .

[24]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  R. Schmidt Movement time as a determiner of timing accuracy. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  I. Brown,et al.  Vision in Vehicles III , 1991 .

[28]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[29]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving targets: Co-operative control of 'when' and 'where' , 1996 .

[30]  M. Turvey,et al.  Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981) , 1981, Cognition.

[31]  D. Glencross,et al.  Developmental differences in a coincident timing task under speed and time constraints , 1985 .

[32]  William Anthony Sparrow,et al.  Energetics of human activity , 2000 .

[33]  K. Newell,et al.  Space-time accuracy of rapid movements. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[34]  J R Tresilian,et al.  Four Questions of Time to Contact: A Critical Examination of Research on Interceptive Timing , 1993, Perception.

[35]  K. Newell,et al.  Movement time and velocity as determinants of movement timing accuracy. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[36]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Variability and Motor Control , 1993 .

[37]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  Keep Your Eye on the Ball: The Science and Folklore of Baseball , 1990 .

[38]  G. Montagne,et al.  The control and coordination of one-handed catching: the effect of temporal constraints , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  E. C. Poulton,et al.  Perceptual Anticipation and Reaction Time , 1950 .

[40]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Perception with an eye for motion , 1986 .

[41]  K M Newell,et al.  Impulse variability in isometric tasks. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[42]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Hitting moving objects: is target speed used in guiding the hand? , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  M. Turvey,et al.  The ecological approach to perceiving-acting: a pictorial essay. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[44]  Martin S. Moran,et al.  A Test of Fitts' Law with Moving Targets , 1980, Human factors.

[45]  J. Tresilian,et al.  a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude , 2022 .

[46]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  James L. Breen What Makes a Good Hitter , 1967 .

[48]  L G Carlton,et al.  The effects of temporal-precision and time-minimization constraints on the spatial and temporal accuracy of aimed hand movements. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[49]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Perceptual and motor processes in interceptive timing , 1994 .

[50]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  Information and action in timing the punch of a falling ball , 2001 .

[51]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[52]  J. Tresilian Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  David N. Lee,et al.  Sensory and intrinsic coordination of movement , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  D Regan,et al.  Visual Judgements and Misjudgements in Cricket, and the Art of Flight , 1992, Perception.

[56]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[57]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Temporal precision of interceptive action: differential effects of target size and speed , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.