Microfluidic Adhesion Induced by Subsurface Microstructures

Natural adhesives in the feet of different arthropods and vertebrates show strong adhesion as well as excellent reusability. Whereas the hierarchical structures on the surface are known to have a substantial effect on adhesion, the role of subsurface structures such as the network of microchannels has not been studied. Inspired by these bioadhesives, we generated elastomeric layers with embedded air- or oil-filled microchannels. These adhesives showed remarkable enhancement of adhesion (∼30 times), which results from the crack-arresting properties of the microchannels, together with the surface stresses caused by the capillary force. The importance of the thickness of the adhesive layer, channel diameter, interchannel spacing, and vertical position within the adhesive has been examined for developing an optimal design of this microfluidic adhesive.

[1]  A. Ghatak,et al.  Embedded template-assisted fabrication of complex microchannels in PDMS and design of a microfluidic adhesive. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  Graeme D. Ruxton,et al.  Structural correlates of increased adhesive efficiency with adult size in the toe pads of hylid tree frogs , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Jun Young Chung,et al.  Roles of discontinuities in bio-inspired adhesive pads , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[5]  A. Geim,et al.  Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair , 2003, Nature materials.

[6]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Sticky Feet: From Animals to Materials , 2007 .

[7]  A. Crosby,et al.  Controlling polymer adhesion with "pancakes". , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[8]  Bruce P. Lee,et al.  A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos , 2007, Nature.

[9]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  Measuring the work of adhesion between a soft confined film and a flexible plate. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  K. Autumn,et al.  Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  A. Jagota,et al.  Adhesion enhancement in a biomimetic fibrillar interface. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Peeling from a biomimetically patterned thin elastic film , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Anand Jagota,et al.  Mechanics of Adhesion Through a Fibrillar Microstructure1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[15]  A. Crosby,et al.  Controlling Adhesion with Surface Hole Patterns , 2006 .

[16]  S. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Adam P Summers,et al.  Biomaterials: Silk-like secretion from tarantula feet , 2006, Nature.