Visual Crowding at a Distance during Predictive Remapping

When we move our eyes, images of objects are displaced on the retina, yet the visual world appears stable. Oculomotor activity just prior to an eye movement contributes to perceptual stability by providing information about the predicted location of a relevant object on the retina following a saccade. It remains unclear, however, whether an object's features are represented at the remapped location. Here, we exploited the phenomenon of visual crowding to show that presaccadic remapping preserves the elementary features of objects at their predicted postsaccadic locations. Observers executed an eye movement and identified a letter probe flashed just before the saccade. Flanking stimuli were flashed around the location that would be occupied by the probe immediately following the saccade. Despite being positioned in the opposite visual field to the probe, these flankers disrupted observers' ability to identify the probe. Crucially, this "remapped crowding" interference was stronger when the flankers were visually similar to the probe than when the flanker and probe stimuli were distinct. Our findings suggest that visual processing at remapped locations is featurally dependent, providing a mechanism for achieving perceptual continuity of objects across saccades.

[1]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[2]  G Chastain,et al.  Confusability and interference between members of parafoveal letter pairs , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  Attentional Facilitation throughout Human Visual Cortex Lingers in Retinotopic Coordinates after Eye Movements , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  The Native Coordinate System of Spatial Attention Is Retinotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Sommer,et al.  Shifting attention to neurons , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention Pointers: Response to Mayo and Sommer , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Melcher Selective attention and the active remapping of object features in trans-saccadic perception , 2009, Vision Research.

[12]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D. Melcher Spatiotopic Transfer of Visual-Form Adaptation across Saccadic Eye Movements , 2005, Current Biology.

[14]  C. Colby,et al.  Trans-saccadic perception , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  D. Melcher The missing link for attention pointers: comment on Cavanagh et al. , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Robert H. Wurtz,et al.  Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[17]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[18]  D. Melcher Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  David Melcher,et al.  Backward Masking and Unmasking Across Saccadic Eye Movements , 2010, Current Biology.

[20]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[21]  David C. Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic Coding of BOLD Signal in Human Visual Cortex Depends on Spatial Attention , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  David Melcher,et al.  Spatiotopic temporal integration of visual motion across saccadic eye movements , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Allocation of attention across saccades , 2012 .

[25]  R. Remington,et al.  Eye Movement Targets Are Released from Visual Crowding , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Wurtz Neuronal mechanisms of visual stability , 2008, Vision Research.

[27]  Bart Krekelberg,et al.  Summation of Visual Motion across Eye Movements Reflects a Nonspatial Decision Mechanism , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional pointers: response to Melcher , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Remapped visual masking. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[30]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[33]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[34]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[35]  L O Harvey,et al.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Junying Yuan,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2022 .

[37]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.