Effect of electrical stimulation on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

This study was designed to examine whether the use of electrical stimulation during mandibular lengthening accelerates new bone formation. Twenty adult female rabbits weighing between 2800 g and 3200 g underwent left mandibular body osteotomy. After a 3 day latency period, an external fixation device was activated at a rate of 0.7 mm per day for 10 days. Direct current electrical stimulation of 10 microA was applied to 10 rabbit mandibles. Two of the screws were used as electrodes during the distraction phase. The other 10 rabbits (control group) were not stimulated. The device was then stabilized for periods of 10, 20, 30 and 60 days in both groups. The distraction segment was evaluated radiographically by assessing the proportion of bone mineral density using a dichroma scan. The amount of new bone formation was studied histologically with an image analyzer to evaluate the bone formation in the distraction gap. Histological examination showed that the new bone formation 10 and 20 days after distraction was greater in the electrical stimulation group than in the control group. Ten and 20 days after distraction, image analysis and analysis of bone mineral density in areas of newly formed bone indicated that there was a greater amount of new bone formation in the stimulation group than in the control group. The radiographic evaluation, however, did not demonstrate significantly different images between the stimulation group and the control group. Thirty and 60 days after distraction, no difference in the amount of new bone formation was noted in either the experimental or the control groups. These results indicate that electrical stimulation during gradual distraction promotes new bone formation in the early retention period in a rabbit model.

[1]  W. Walsh,et al.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a comparison of distraction rates in the rabbit model. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[2]  C. Hamanishi,et al.  Bone Mineral Density Changes in Distracted Callus Stimulated by Pulsed Direct Electrical Current , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  W. Walsh,et al.  The role of latency in mandibular osteodistraction. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[4]  M. Blank,et al.  Mechanistic Approaches to Interactions of Electric and Electromagnetic Fields with Living Systems , 1987, Springer US.

[5]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Facilitated healing of osseous lesions in the canine mandible after electrical stimulation. , 1979, Journal of oral surgery.

[6]  R. J. Pawluk,et al.  In Vivo Effects of Direct Current in the Mandible , 1976, Journal of dental research.

[7]  C. Brighton,et al.  Bone reaction to varying amounts of direct current. , 1970, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[8]  C. Brighton,et al.  ELECTRICAL STIMULATION AND OXYGEN TENSION * , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  T. Goto,et al.  Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction. The role of periosteum and endosteum. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  S. Matsunaga Histological and histochemical investigations of constant direct current stimulated intramedullary callus. , 1986, Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai zasshi.

[11]  T. Ohashi,et al.  The electrical induction of callus formation and external skeletal fixation using methyl methacrylate for delayed union of open tibial fracture with segmental loss. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J F Connolly,et al.  A multicenter study of the treatment of non-union with constant direct current. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  J R Anderson,et al.  Effect of capacitive coupled electrical stimulation on regenerate bone , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  K. Salyer,et al.  Distraction Osteogenesis of Costochondral Neomandibles: A Clinical Experience , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  C. Brighton,et al.  Direct-current stimulation of non-union and congenital pseudarthrosis. Exploration of its clinical application. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  C. Brighton,et al.  Healing of nonunion of the medial malleolus by means of direct current: a case report. , 1971, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  T. Takato,et al.  The Histologic Analysis of Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible in Rabbits , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  J. Bardach,et al.  Role of animal models in experimental studies of craniofacial growth following cleft lip and palate repair. , 1988, The Cleft palate journal.