Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany

PurposeWith many policies in Germany steering towards a bioeconomy, there is a need for analytical tools that assess not only the environmental and economic implications but also the social implications of a transition to a bioeconomy. Wood is expected to become a major biomass resource in bioeconomy regions. Therefore, this paper develops a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) framework that can be applied specifically to a wood-based production system in one of Germany’s bioeconomy regions.MethodsThis paper reviews and analyses existing sLCA approaches, in terms of how applicable they are for assessing a wood-based production system in a German bioeconomy regional context. The analysis is structured according to the standard phases of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). However, we use the term social effects rather than social impacts, to acknowledge the unknown cause–effect relationship between an organisation’s activities and its social impacts. We also consider the establishment of regional system boundaries, as well as the relationship between the social effects and the product being assessed. Additionally, an approach for the development and selection of social indicators and indices is outlined. Furthermore, we discuss data requirements and present an approach for a social life cycle impact assessment method.Results and discussionA new conceptual framework for a context-specific sLCA to assess wood-based products manufactured in a bioeconomy region was developed. It enables sLCA practitioners to identify “social hotspots” and “social opportunities” from a regional perspective. The location and characteristics of these social hotspots and opportunities can be analysed, in particular, for major production activities in a bioeconomy region in Germany. Therefore, according to this framework, the development of social indices and indicators, the collection of data and the approach used for characterising social effects need to relate to the geographical context of the product being assessed. The proposed framework can, thus, help to identify, monitor and evaluate the social sustainability of wood-based bioeconomy chains in a regional context.ConclusionsThis framework requires a high level of detail in the social inventory and impact assessment phase, in order to assess the regional foreground activities in a German wood-based bioeconomy region. It enables sLCA studies to identify which social hotspots and social opportunities occur and where they are located in the wood-based production system of a regional bioeconomy.

[1]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective-Lessons learned , 2008 .

[2]  Annekatrin Lehmann,et al.  Integration of Social Aspects in Decision Support, Based on Life Cycle Thinking , 2011 .

[3]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The computational structure of life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[4]  C. P. Wolf,et al.  Social Impact Assessment: The State Of the Art , 1983 .

[5]  S. Mathé,et al.  Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  M. Hauschild,et al.  A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (10 pp) , 2006 .

[7]  Stefan Majer,et al.  When considering no man is an island—assessing bioenergy systems in a regional and LCA context: a review , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  A. Schulte,et al.  Germany's forest cluster: exploratory spatial data analysis of regional agglomerations and structural change in wood-based employment - primary wood processing. , 2010 .

[9]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Societal LCA Methodology and Case Study (12 pp) , 2006 .

[10]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Strengths or bias in social LCA? , 2011 .

[11]  Alan C. Brent,et al.  Social Indicators for Sustainable Project and Technology Life Cycle Management in the Process Industry (13 pp + 4) , 2006 .

[12]  M. Kircher The transition to a bio‐economy: national perspectives , 2012 .

[13]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 2: implementation in six company case studies , 2010 .

[14]  Rafaela Hillerbrand,et al.  A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA , 2011 .

[15]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs , 2013 .

[16]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands , 2011 .

[17]  Carmela Cucuzzella,et al.  Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment , 2014 .

[19]  Thomas Swarr,et al.  Societal life cycle assessment—could you repeat the question? , 2009 .

[20]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Environmental and Social Life Cycle Assessment of Welding Technologies , 2015 .

[21]  Luigia Petti,et al.  Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Characterisation of social impacts in LCA , 2010 .

[23]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Methodologies for social life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[24]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  Julie Parent,et al.  Socioeconomic LCA of Milk Production in Canada , 2015 .

[26]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2011 .

[27]  Saeed Mansour,et al.  Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[28]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! , 2010 .

[29]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[30]  Gregory A. Norris,et al.  Efficient Assessment of Social Hotspots in the Supply Chains of 100 Product Categories Using the Social Hotspots Database , 2014 .

[31]  Rajendra Kumar Foolmaun,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.