An exploratory analysis targeting diagnostic classification of AAC app usage patterns

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) apps are apps that enable non-speech communicative forms. One class of AAC apps are speech-generating devices (SGDs), where icons/pictures are tapped to produce spoken words. These apps are widely used to support communication and language learning for individuals with disabilities such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Given that these apps are used in everyday scenarios, they can generate massive streams of data, providing a wealth of information regarding individual usage patterns and for developing usage model profiles. However, the utility and potential of these streams of data has been little explored from a data mining perspective. The objective of this study is to evaluate several feature representations of usage patterns, coupled with data mining and data modelling techniques, for identifying differences in AAC usage patterns between users with and without ASD. The study is conducted using data streams aggregated from an AAC app called FreeSpeech, specifically designed for individuals with learning disabilities and ASD. Several feature representations for modeling usage profiles based on temporal, behavioral and frequency of usage, are investigated. The potential of each usage representation is assessed using a collection of well-known and well-established learning methods such as support vector machine and ensemble learning. While, in general, prediction performance was only slightly above chance in most representations, results from unsupervised class labeling experiments showed promising results regarding the potential of stationary keypress usage representations with bootstrapped ensembles for separating ASD from non-ASD users.

[1]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Multiplying the Mileage of Your Dataset with Subwindowing , 2011, Brain Informatics.

[2]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Biasing the overlapping and non-overlapping sub-windows of EEG recording , 2012, The 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[3]  Elizabeth K Hanson,et al.  Communication Support through Multimodal Supplementation:A Scoping Review , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[4]  Jill Bradshaw,et al.  The use of augmentative and alternative communication apps for the iPad, iPod and iPhone: an overview of recent developments , 2013 .

[5]  F. Shic,et al.  Computer-Assisted Face Processing Instruction Improves Emotion Recognition, Mentalizing, and Social Skills in Students with ASD , 2015, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[6]  Janice Light,et al.  Supporting the Communication, Language, and Literacy Development of Children with Complex Communication Needs: State of the Science and Future Research Priorities , 2012, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[7]  Kathryn Drager,et al.  AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[8]  Gail T. Gillon,et al.  Supporting the Communication Development of Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2017 .

[9]  Mandy Rispoli,et al.  Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature , 2010, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[10]  Mandy Rispoli,et al.  An aggregate study of single-case research involving aided AAC: Participant characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders , 2011 .

[11]  Frederick Shic,et al.  Report : A Mobile Application to Treat Prosodic Deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Other Communication Impairments : A Pilot Study , 2017 .

[12]  Quan Wang,et al.  Linking volitional preferences for emotional information to social difficulties: A game approach using the microsoft kinect , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII).

[13]  Janice Light,et al.  The iPad and Mobile Technology Revolution: Benefits and Challenges for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[14]  Rajinder Koul,et al.  Use of iPad/iPods with Individuals with Autism and other Developmental Disabilities: A Meta-analysis of Communication Interventions , 2014 .

[15]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Multiplication of EEG Samples through Replicating, Biasing, and Overlapping , 2012, Brain Informatics.

[16]  A. Atyabi,et al.  The impact of segmentation and replication on non-overlapping windows: An EEG study , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology.

[17]  Adham Atyabi,et al.  Mobile ascertainment of smoking status through breath: A machine learning approach , 2016, 2016 IEEE 7th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON).

[18]  Jennifer B. Ganz,et al.  Effectiveness of the PECS Phase III app and choice between the app and traditional PECS among preschoolers with ASD , 2013 .

[19]  Jennifer Stephenson We need to know more about providing effective support for communication partners of children who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2016 .

[20]  Pat Mirenda Promising Innovations in AAC for Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2009 .

[21]  Samuel C. Sennott,et al.  Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go , 2009 .

[22]  J. Ganz,et al.  AAC Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: State of the Science and Future Research Directions , 2015, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[23]  Lilli Flink,et al.  Brief Report: Remotely Delivered Video Modeling for Improving Oral Hygiene in Children with ASD: A Pilot Study , 2016, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[24]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Review on Ensembles for the Class Imbalance Problem: Bagging-, Boosting-, and Hybrid-Based Approaches , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[25]  T. Bartolotta,et al.  A Review of 21 iPad Applications for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Purposes , 2012 .

[26]  Donghai Guan,et al.  A Review of Ensemble Learning Based Feature Selection , 2014 .

[27]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Speech Output Technologies in Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Scoping Review , 2015, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[28]  Jennifer Abramson,et al.  Applying Technology to Visually Support Language and Communication in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2012, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.