Research Review: Parents’ service experience – a missing element in research on foster care case outcomes

A large body of child protection literature focuses on termination of parental rights, family reunification, and children's re-entry into care as outcomes for children in foster care. Studies have investigated child, placement, family, and parent variables as predictors of case outcome. However, one important group of variables remains largely unstudied: factors related to parents’ service experience. Parents’ service experience includes parents’ perceptions of and involvement in the various services in which they must participate in order to recover their children from foster care (e.g. mandated treatment programmes such as substance abuse rehabilitation, parenting skills classes, etc.). The parental perspective on the foster care process is a critical element in the life of a child protection case, and its influence on case outcome must be explored. A brief review of the current literature on case outcome predictors is provided and parents’ service experience is highlighted as an area in need of investigation. Suggestions for the measurement of parents’ service experience are also offered.

[1]  Tamara N. Hunter Msw Child Welfare and Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (AOD): Bridging the Gap to Comprehensive Services , 2004 .

[2]  Katherine V. Kortenkamp,et al.  The role of welfare and work in predicting foster care reunification rates for children of welfare recipients , 2004 .

[3]  Rae R. Newton,et al.  Race, ethnicity, and case outcomes in child protective services , 2004 .

[4]  S. Kapp,et al.  The unheard client: Assessing the satisfaction of parents of children in foster care , 2004 .

[5]  T. Spratt,et al.  Parents’ Views on Social Work Interventions in Child Welfare Cases , 2004 .

[6]  Marian S. Harris,et al.  The interaction of race, ethnicity, and family structure with respect to the timing of family reunification , 2003 .

[7]  K. Wells,et al.  Mothers' Welfare and Work Income and Reunification with Children in Foster Care , 2003 .

[8]  D. Finkelhor,et al.  Improving data systems about juvenile victimization in the United States. , 2003, Child abuse & neglect.

[9]  S. Kapp,et al.  Client Satisfaction Methods: Input from Parents with Children in Foster Care , 2002 .

[10]  S. Mangelsdorf,et al.  Making visits better: the perspectives of parents, foster parents, and child welfare workers. , 2002, Child welfare.

[11]  T. Terling The efficacy of family reunification practices: reentry rates and correlates of reentry for abused and neglected children reunited with their families. , 1999, Child abuse & neglect.

[12]  K. Wells,et al.  Reunification and reentry of foster children , 1999 .

[13]  E. Walton In-Home Family-Focused Reunification: A Six-Year Follow-Up of a Successful Experiment , 1998 .

[14]  Loring P. Jones The social and family correlates of successful reunification of children in foster care , 1998 .

[15]  Anna Gupta,et al.  The context of decision-making in cases of child neglect , 1998 .

[16]  M. Drakeford,et al.  Social workers, parents and stigma , 1997 .

[17]  E. Farmer Family reunification with high risk children: Lessons from research , 1996 .

[18]  T. Festinger Going home and returning to foster care , 1996 .

[19]  W. D. Diorio Parental Perceptions of the Authority of Public Child Welfare Caseworkers , 1992 .

[20]  S. McMurtry,et al.  Differential exit rates of minority children in foster care , 1992 .