Perspectives on molecular and anatomical imaging in drug discovery.

INTRODUCTION The role of medical imaging in the preclinical, pharmaceutical environment has entered a growth phase in the drug discovery setting due to at least three main factors: (i) improved technology, specific to the imaging of small animals; (ii) the high-visibility impact of imaging on the practice of human medicine; and (iii) operational advantages leading to a competitive advantage over other drug discovery organizations (1,2). However, it is important to note that as much as one could make the case to employ imaging, it must also be emphasized that an organizational investment—both monetary and operationally—must be made for the proper implementation and integration of imaging into a company’s drug development work flow (1,2). Still the question remains: What is the role of imaging, both molecular and anatomical, in improving the current drug discovery process? This article examines this question in light of the experiences of the authors in establishing an Imaging Sciences Group at Millennium Pharmaceuticals (Cambridge, MA, USA), as well as personal communications with colleagues in the field. First, we will briefly review why imaging could impact pharmaceutical drug development—a process wrought with potential failures—and then highlight specific examples of the approaches that we have taken.

[1]  T. Reese,et al.  In vivo magnetic resonance methods in pharmaceutical research: current status and perspectives , 1999, NMR in biomedicine.

[2]  R. Hargreaves,et al.  Clinical biomarkers in drug discovery and development , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  D. Piwnica-Worms,et al.  Spying on cancer: molecular imaging in vivo with genetically encoded reporters. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[4]  T. Nelson,et al.  The effect of dexamethasone on tissue water distribution and proton relaxation in Panc02 tumors. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Z. Bhujwalla,et al.  1H NMR spectroscopy of subcutaneous tumors in mice: Preliminary studies of effects of growth, chemotherapy and blood flow reduction , 1992, NMR in biomedicine.

[6]  Brian Middleton,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of vascular changes induced by the VEGF-signalling inhibitor ZD4190 in human tumour xenografts. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  J. Waterton,et al.  Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to evaluate acute treatment with ZD6474, a VEGF signalling inhibitor, in PC-3 prostate tumours , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[9]  K. Taber,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the efficacy of specific inhibition of 5α‐reductase in canine spontaneous benign prostatic hyperplasia , 1991 .

[10]  M. Osteaux,et al.  Inhibitory effect of somatostatin analogue RC-160 on the growth of hepatic metastases of colon cancer in rats: a study with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Cancer research.

[11]  P. Bendel,et al.  In vivo studies by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the response to tamoxifen of MCF7 human breast cancer implanted in nude mice. , 1991, Cancer communications.

[12]  B. Klaunberg,et al.  In vivo bioluminescence imaging. , 2004, Comparative medicine.

[13]  M. Silva,et al.  Spiculated periosteal response induced by intraosseous injection of 22Rv1 prostate cancer cells resembles subset of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients , 2005, The Prostate.

[14]  G. Roodman Mechanisms of bone metastasis. , 2004, Discovery medicine.

[15]  J. Hennig,et al.  PTK787/ZK 222584, a specific vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, affects the anatomy of the tumor vascular bed and the functional vascular properties as detected by dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Cancer research.

[16]  R. Weissleder Scaling down imaging: molecular mapping of cancer in mice , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Molecular imaging in drug discovery and development , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  A. Reddi,et al.  Mechanisms of Tumor Metastasis to the Bone: Challenges and Opportunities , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  M. Silva,et al.  A Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Monoclonal Antibody–Chemotherapeutic Conjugate Designed for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[20]  M. Rudin,et al.  From anatomy to the target: Contributions of magnetic resonance imaging to preclinical pharmaceutical research , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[21]  M. Rudin,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of estradiol‐induced pituitary hyperplasia in rats , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  S. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of the effects of new specific azasteroid inhibitors of steroid 5α‐reductase on canine hyperplastic prostate: Suppression of prostatic DHT correlated with prostate regression , 1995, The Prostate.

[23]  S. Cherry,et al.  Fundamentals of Positron Emission Tomography and Applications in Preclinical Drug Development , 2001, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[24]  P. Furmanski,et al.  1H-NMR relaxation times and water compartmentalization in experimental tumor models. , 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  P. Barker,et al.  Tumor trapping of 5-fluorouracil: in vivo 19F NMR spectroscopic pharmacokinetics in tumor-bearing humans and rabbits. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  G. Mundy Metastasis: Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  L Lasagna,et al.  Cost of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. , 1991, Journal of health economics.

[28]  Simon A Roberts Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics in drug discovery. , 2003, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[29]  M. Rudin,et al.  Partial inhibition of the growth of transplanted dunning rat prostate tumors with the long-acting somatostatin analogue sandostatin (SMS 201-995). , 1988, Cancer research.