Osteoblast–Seeded Bioglass/Gelatin Nanocomposite: A Promising Bone Substitute in Critical-Size Calvarial Defect Repair in Rat

Introduction Amid the plethora of methods to repair critical bone defects, there is no one perfect approach. In this study, we sought to evaluate a potent 3-dimensional (3D) bioactive SiO2-CaO-P2O5 glasses (bioglass)/gelatin (gel) scaffold for its biocompatibility by seeding cells as well as for its regenerative properties by animal implantation. Methods Osteoblast cells were seeded onto nanocomposite scaffolds to investigate the process of critical-size calvarial defect via new bone formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to validate topography of the scaffolds, its homogeneity and ideal cellular attachment. Proliferation assay and confocal microscopy were used to evaluate its biocompatibility. To validate osteogenesis of the bioactive nanocomposite scaffolds, they were first implanted into rats and later removed and analyzed at different time points post mortem using histological, immunohistochemical and histomorphometric methods. Results Based on in vitro results, we showed that our nanocomposite is highly cell-compatible material and allows for osteoblasts to adhere, spread and proliferate. In vivo results indicate that our nanocomposite provides a significant contribution to bone regeneration and is highly biodegradable and biocompatible. So, seeded scaffolds with osteoblasts enhanced repair of critical bone defects via osteogenesis. Conclusions We demonstrate the feasibility of engineering a nanocomposite scaffold with an architecture resembling the human bone, and provide proof-of-concept validation for our scaffold using a rat animal model.

[1]  M. Mozafari,et al.  Synthesis, physico-chemical and biological characterization of strontium and cobalt substituted bioactive glasses for bone tissue engineering , 2016 .

[2]  A. Seifalian,et al.  Fabrication and in vivo evaluation of an osteoblast-conditioned nano-hydroxyapatite/gelatin composite scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. , 2016, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[3]  M. Soleimani,et al.  Repair of rat critical size calvarial defect using osteoblast-like and umbilical vein endothelial cells seeded in gelatin/hydroxyapatite scaffolds. , 2016, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[4]  Benu Sethi,et al.  Sterilization techniques for biodegradable scaffolds in tissue engineering applications , 2016, Journal of tissue engineering.

[5]  K. Chua,et al.  Differential osteogenic potential of human adipose-derived stem cells co-cultured with human osteoblasts on polymeric microfiber scaffolds. , 2016, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  A. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Impact of silk fibroin-based scaffold structures on human osteoblast MG63 cell attachment and proliferation , 2015, International journal of nanomedicine.

[7]  M. Mozafari,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluations of three‐dimensional hydroxyapatite/silk fibroin nanocomposite scaffolds , 2015, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[8]  M. Dodel,et al.  Development of Polyvinyl Alcohol Fibrous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Nerve Tissue Engineering Applications: In Vitro Study , 2015 .

[9]  Afsaneh Amiri,et al.  Preparation and evaluation of novel nano-bioglass/gelatin conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[10]  M. Azami,et al.  Effect of laminated hydroxyapatite/gelatin nanocomposite scaffold structure on osteogenesis using unrestricted somatic stem cells in rat , 2013, Cell biology international.

[11]  A. A. I. Fooladi,et al.  Sol-gel-derived bioactive glass containing SiO2-MgO-CaO-P2O5 as an antibacterial scaffold. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[12]  R. Skoracki,et al.  Development of nanomaterials for bone repair and regeneration. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[13]  J. Jansen,et al.  Synthesis and application of nanostructured calcium phosphate ceramics for bone regeneration. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[14]  J. Jansen,et al.  Evaluation of bone regeneration using the rat critical size calvarial defect , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[15]  R. Marchant,et al.  Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds , 2011, Expert review of medical devices.

[16]  Cato T. Laurencin,et al.  Nanostructured Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2011 .

[17]  M. Mozafari,et al.  Development of macroporous nanocomposite scaffolds of gelatin/bioactive glass prepared through layer solvent casting combined with lamination technique for bone tissue engineering , 2010 .

[18]  D. Xue,et al.  Reconstruction of rat calvarial defects with human mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblast-like cells in poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid scaffolds. , 2010, European cells & materials.

[19]  Jennifer L. Moreau,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation on an injectable calcium phosphate-chitosan composite scaffold. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[20]  H. S. Azevedo,et al.  Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Guided bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects using biphasic hydroxyapatite + beta tricalcium phosphate (Bone Ceramic) or a collagen-coated natural bone mineral (BioOss Collagen): an immunohistochemical study in dogs. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[22]  M. Farina,et al.  Histomorphometric Analysis of Tissue Responses to Bioactive Glass Implants in Critical Defects in Rat Calvaria , 2007, Cells Tissues Organs.

[23]  Hyoun‐Ee Kim,et al.  Hydroxyapatite and gelatin composite foams processed via novel freeze-drying and crosslinking for use as temporary hard tissue scaffolds. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[24]  Ahmed El-Ghannam,et al.  Bone reconstruction: from bioceramics to tissue engineering , 2005, Expert review of medical devices.

[25]  Linda G Griffith,et al.  Engineering principles of clinical cell-based tissue engineering. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Bioactivity of gel-glass powders in the CaO-SiO2 system: a comparison with ternary (CaO-P2O5-SiO2) and quaternary glasses (SiO2-CaO-P2O5-Na2O). , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[27]  L. Hench,et al.  Evaluation of Bioglass/dextran composite as a bone graft substitute. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[28]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Implant placement enhanced by bioactive glass particles of narrow size range. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[29]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive glass particulate material as a filler for bone lesions. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.