Ranked Set Sampling

The most common sampling approach for collecting data from a population with the goal of making inferences about unknown features of the population is a simple random sample (SRS). There is a probabilistic guarantee that each measured observation in an SRS can be considered representative of the population. Despite this assurance, there remains a distinct possibility that a specific SRS might not provide a truly representative picture of the population. With that in mind, statisticians have developed a variety of ways to guard against obtaining such unrepresentative samples. Sampling designs such as stratified sampling, probability sampling, and cluster sampling all provide additional structure on the sampling process to improve the likelihood that the collected sample data do, indeed, provide a good representation of the population. A secondary goal in most data collection settings is to minimize the costs associated with obtaining the data. Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a relatively recent development that addresses both of these issues. It uses additional information from the population to provide more structure to the data collection process and decreases the likelihood of an unrepresentative sample. In addition, it is designed to minimize the number of measured observations required to achieve the desired precision in making inferences. In this article, we provide a general introduction to both balanced and unbalanced RSS, describing the basic approaches for collecting each type of RSS and some of the associated properties. We discuss a number of important factors that affect the performance of RSS procedures. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

[1]  Lynne Stokes,et al.  Parametric ranked set sampling , 1995, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics.

[2]  G. McIntyre,et al.  A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets , 1952 .

[3]  J. L. Clutter,et al.  Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background , 1972 .

[4]  Lora L. Bohn A review of nonparametric ranked-set sampling methodology , 1996 .

[5]  Zehua Chen,et al.  General ranked set sampling with cost considerations. , 2004, Biometrics.

[6]  Kazumasa Wakimoto,et al.  On unbiased estimates of the population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering , 1968 .

[7]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  A new ranked set sampling protocol for the signed rank test , 2001 .

[8]  R. Randles,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Nonparametric Statistics , 1991 .

[9]  Thomas P. Hettmansperger The ranked-set sample sign test , 1995 .

[10]  I. Goudie,et al.  Conditionally Unbiased Estimation of Population Size Under Plant-Capture , 2008 .

[11]  Brett Presnell,et al.  U-Statistics and imperfect ranking in ranked set sampling , 1999 .

[12]  Gutti Jogesh Babu,et al.  Sign test for ranked-set sampling , 1996 .

[13]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Alternative ranked set sampling protocols for the sign test , 2000 .

[14]  Ramzi W Nahhas,et al.  Ranked set sampling: cost and optimal set size. , 2002, Biometrics.

[15]  Vic Barnett,et al.  Best linear unbiased estimates in ranked-set sampling with particular reference to imperfect ordering , 1997 .

[16]  G. P. Patil Editorial: ranked set sampling , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[17]  Lora L. Bohn A ranked-set sample signed-rank statistic , 1998 .

[18]  Douglas A Wolfe,et al.  Unbalanced ranked set sampling for estimating a population proportion. , 2006, Biometrics.

[19]  Douglas A. Wolfe Ranked set sampling: An approach to more efficient data collection , 2004 .

[20]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  An application of ranked set sampling for mean and median estimation using USDA crop production data , 2005 .

[21]  Steven N. MacEachern,et al.  Nonparametric Two-Sample Methods for Ranked-Set Sample Data , 2006 .

[22]  Nicolle A. Mode,et al.  Ranked set sampling for ecological research: accounting for the total costs of sampling , 1999 .

[23]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Two-Sample Procedures for Ranked-Set Samples Data , 1992 .

[24]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Unbalanced Ranked Set Sampling for Estimating A Population Proportion Under Imperfect Rankings , 2009 .

[25]  M. S. Ridout,et al.  An investigation into the use of ranked set sampling on grass and grass-clover swards , 1985 .

[26]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Cautionary note on unbalanced ranked-set sampling , 2007 .

[27]  Vic Barnett Ranked set sample design for environmental investigations , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[28]  J. T. Terpstra On Estimating a Population Proportion via Ranked Set Sampling , 2004 .

[29]  T. Sager,et al.  Characterization of a Ranked-Set Sample with Application to Estimating Distribution Functions , 1988 .

[30]  Mohammad Fraiwan Al-Saleh,et al.  Estimation of average milk yield using ranked set sampling , 2001 .

[31]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Estimation of population mean and variance in flock management: a ranked set sampling approach in a finite population setting , 2005 .

[32]  Jesse Frey,et al.  New imperfect rankings models for ranked set sampling , 2007 .

[33]  G. P. Patil,et al.  Ranked set sampling: an annotated bibliography , 1995, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[34]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Optimal allocation procedure in ranked set sampling for unimodal and multi-modal distributions , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[35]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  The Effect of Imperfect Judgment Rankings on Properties of Procedures Based on the Ranked-Set Samples Analog of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon Statistic , 1994 .

[36]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  UNEQUAL ALLOCATION MODELS FOR RANKED SET SAMPLING WITH SKEW DISTRIBUTIONS , 1997 .

[37]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Environmental sampling with a concomitant variable: A comparison between ranked set sampling and stratified simple random sampling , 1996 .