A Comparison of Particle-in-cell and Hybrid Simulations of the Heliospheric Termination Shock

We compare hybrid (kinetic proton, fluid electron) and particle-in-cell (kinetic proton, kinetic electron) simulations of the solar wind termination shock with parameters similar to those observed by Voyager 2 during its crossing. The steady-state results show excellent agreement between the downstream variations in the density, plasma velocity, and magnetic field. The quasi-perpendicular shock accelerates interstellar pickup ions to a maximum energy limited by the size of the computational domain, with somewhat higher fluxes and maximal energies observed in the particle-in-cell simulation, likely due to differences in the cross-shock electric field arising from electron kinetic-scale effects. The higher fluxes may help address recent discrepancies noted between observations and large-scale hybrid simulations.

[1]  G. Zank,et al.  Probing the Length of the Heliospheric Tail with Energetic Neutral Atoms (ENAs) from 0.52 to 80 keV , 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[2]  S. M. Krimigis,et al.  On the Energization of Pickup Ions Downstream of the Heliospheric Termination Shock by Comparing 0.52–55 keV Observed Energetic Neutral Atom Spectra to Ones Inferred from Proton Hybrid Simulations , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[3]  Rahul Kumar,et al.  Energy Distribution of Pickup Ions at the Solar Wind Termination Shock , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[4]  B. Lembège,et al.  Physical Roles of Interstellar-origin Pickup Ions at Heliospheric Termination Shock. II. Impact of the Front Nonstationary on the Energy Partition and Particle Velocity Distribution , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[5]  E. Möbius,et al.  Observational study of the cooling behavior of interstellar helium pickup ions in the inner heliosphere , 2013 .

[6]  M. Gedalin,et al.  The role pickup ions play in the termination shock , 2013 .

[7]  J. Richardson,et al.  Magnetic fields at the solar wind termination shock , 2008, Nature.

[8]  John W. Belcher,et al.  Cool heliosheath plasma and deceleration of the upstream solar wind at the termination shock , 2008, Nature.

[9]  S. Krimigis,et al.  Mediation of the solar wind termination shock by non-thermal ions , 2008, Nature.

[10]  D. Burgess,et al.  Pickup protons at quasi-perpendicular shocks: full particle electrodynamic simulations , 2007 .

[11]  D. Burgess,et al.  Simulations of Electron Acceleration at Collisionless Shocks: The Effects of Surface Fluctuations , 2006, astro-ph/0610714.

[12]  R. E. Lee,et al.  Perpendicular Shock Reformation and Ion Acceleration , 2005 .

[13]  D. C. Hamilton,et al.  Voyager 1 in the Foreshock, Termination Shock, and Heliosheath , 2005, Science.

[14]  J. Giacalone Particle Acceleration at Shocks Moving through an Irregular Magnetic Field , 2004 .

[15]  D. Burgess,et al.  The properties and causes of rippling in quasi-perpendicular collisionless shock fronts , 2003 .

[16]  D. Ellison,et al.  Direct Acceleration of Pickup Ions at the Solar Wind Termination Shock: The Production of Anomalous Cosmic Rays , 1998, astro-ph/9809137.

[17]  B. Lembège,et al.  Nonstationarity of a two-dimensional quasiperpendicular supercritical collisionless shock by self-reformation , 1992 .

[18]  S. Ferrara Natur , 2021, Die große Erfindung.