Model fit and model selection

This paper uses an example to show that a model that fits the available data perfectly may provide worse answers to policy questions than an alternative, imperfectly fitting model. The author argues that, in the context of Bayesian estimation, this result can be interpreted as being due to the use of an inappropriate prior over the parameters of shock processes. He urges the use of priors that are obtained from explicit auxiliary information, not from the desire to obtain identification.

[1]  T. Liu,et al.  Underidentification, Structural Estimation, and Forecasting , 1960 .

[2]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[3]  Lawrence J. Christiano,et al.  Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Frank Smets,et al.  An Estimated Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Frank Schorfheide,et al.  Testing for Indeterminacy: An Application to U. S. Monetary Policy , 2002 .

[6]  Lawrence J. Christiano,et al.  Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy , 2005 .

[7]  Fabio Canova,et al.  Back to Square One: Identification Issues in DSGE Models , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  F. Smets,et al.  An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. NBB Working Paper Nr. 35 , 2002 .

[9]  Frank Schorfheide,et al.  Loss function‐based evaluation of DSGE models , 2000 .

[10]  C. Sims.  MACROECONOMICS AND REALITY , 1977 .

[11]  Allan H. Meltzer,et al.  The Phillips curve , 1976 .

[12]  Tjalling C. Koopmans,et al.  Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models , 1951 .

[13]  David V. Pritchett.  Econometric policy evaluation: A critique , 1976 .

[14]  Frank Schorfheide,et al.  Staff Reports Forming Priors for DSGE Models ( and How It Affects the Assessment of Nominal Rigidities ) , 2008 .

[15]  K. Arrow,et al.  The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , 2020 .