An examination of the relation of individual difference variables to loneliness.

This study investigated the relation of five individual difference variables (extroversion, depression, self-esteem, neuroticism, and attitude toward others) to loneliness. The relative contributions of two different models that might explain these relations were examined. One model suggests that individual difference variables are related to loneliness through the mediation of social network variables; that is, individual difference variables may reduce people's motivation and/or ability to build and maintain social relationships, which in turn leads to loneliness. The second model, the cognitive bias model, states that both the individual difference variables and loneliness are influenced by the same intrapersonal, cognitive processes. Some people are prone to negative affect and tend to evaluate themselves and their relationships negatively. The relations of self-esteem, neuroticism, and depression to loneliness were hypothesized to reflect the cognitive bias model, while extroversion and attitudes toward others were hypothesized to be related to loneliness through the mediation of social network variables. Eighty-two female and 42 male adults completed measures of loneliness and the five individual difference variables, as well as an instrument assessing their social networks. The results indicated partial support for both models for each of the individual difference variables. Together, the two models did a good job of explaining the correlations of the individual difference variables and loneliness. The implications of these findings, as well as their relation to previous research, are discussed.

[1]  I. Levin,et al.  Gender differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Joseph P. Stokes,et al.  The relation of social network and individual difference variables to loneliness. , 1985 .

[3]  K. Rook,et al.  The negative side of social interaction: impact on psychological well-being. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  J. Stokes,et al.  The inventory of socially supportive behaviors: Dimensionality, prediction, and gender differences , 1984, American journal of community psychology.

[5]  D. Watson,et al.  Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  D. Russell,et al.  Social and emotional loneliness: an examination of Weiss's typology of loneliness. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Joseph P. Stokes,et al.  Predicting satisfaction with social support from social network structure , 1983 .

[8]  S. Kobasa,et al.  Personality and social resources in stress resistance. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  I. Sarason,et al.  Assessing Social Support: The Social Support Questionnaire. , 1983 .

[10]  W. H. Jones,et al.  Loneliness and social skill deficits. , 1982, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  M. Hojat,et al.  Loneliness as a function of selected personality variables. , 1982, Journal of clinical psychology.

[12]  Manuel Barrera,et al.  Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students , 1981 .

[13]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  Attributions in the Sports Pages , 1980 .

[14]  B. J. Hirsch Natural support systems and coping with major life changes , 1980 .

[15]  T. Brennan,et al.  Adolescent Loneliness: An Exploratory Study of Social and Psychological Pre-Dispositions and Theory. Volume 1. , 1979 .

[16]  D. Russell,et al.  Developing a measure of loneliness. , 1978, Journal of personality assessment.

[17]  W. Fey,et al.  Acceptance by others and its relation to acceptance of self and others: a revaluation. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.