Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems

This study investigated how the human auditory brainstem represents constituent elements of speech sounds differently in children with language-based learning problems (LP, n = 9) compared to normal children (NL, n = 11), especially under stress of rapid stimulation. Children were chosen for this study based on performance on measures of reading and spelling and measures of syllable discrimination. In response to the onset of the speech sound /da/, wave V-V(n) of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) had a significantly shallower slope in LP children, suggesting longer duration and/or smaller amplitude. The amplitude of the frequency following response (FFR) was diminished in LP subjects over the 229-686 Hz range, which corresponds to the first formant of the/da/ stimulus, while activity at 114 Hz, representing the fundamental frequency of /da/, was no different between groups. Normal indicators of auditory peripheral integrity suggest a central, neural origin of these differences. These data suggest that poor representation of crucial components of speech sounds could contribute to difficulties with higher-level language processes.

[1]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  N. Kraus,et al.  Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli in dyslexia: evidence from functional MRI. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[5]  J. T. Marsh,et al.  Sound evoked frequency‐following responses in the central auditory pathway , 1968, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  S. Nagarajan Successive signal representation in noise in dyslexics , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  P. Tallal,et al.  Speech acoustic-cue discrimination abilities of normally developing and language-impaired children. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  F. Ramus,et al.  Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Gary J. Robertson,et al.  Wide Range Achievement Test 3 ( wrat3 ) , 2001 .

[10]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Microstructure of Temporo-Parietal White Matter as a Basis for Reading Ability Evidence from Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Neuron.

[11]  P. Tallal Language disabilities in children: perceptual correlates. , 1981, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[12]  J R Boston,et al.  Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials. , 1985, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  D L Jewett,et al.  Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. , 1971, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  A. Møller,et al.  Contributions from the auditory nerve to the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs): results of intracranial recording in man. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  John C. Brantley,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson psycho-Educational battery: Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. Hingham, MA: Teaching resources, 1977. $92.50 , 1981 .

[16]  R. Burkard,et al.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. Jirsa Maximum length sequences-auditory brainstem responses from children with auditory processing disorders. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[18]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiological Basis of Speech: A Case for the Preeminence of Temporal Processing , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  R. Dykman,et al.  EEG Power Spectra of Children with Dyslexia, Slow Learners, and Normally Reading Children with ADD During Verbal Processing , 1994, Journal of learning disabilities.

[20]  H. Funai Neural Generators of Auditory Brainstem Responses studied by the [14C] deoxyglucose Method in Rats , 1987 .

[21]  P. Tallal,et al.  Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  Andrea S. Kelly,et al.  Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response, and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[23]  B Wible,et al.  Abnormal neural encoding of repeated speech stimuli in noise in children with learning problems , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  J. GohK Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology , 1997 .

[25]  R. Fay,et al.  The Mammalian auditory pathway : neurophysiology , 1992 .

[26]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Learning Disabilities: Historical and Conceptual Issues , 1991 .

[27]  R. Burkard,et al.  The human auditory brainstem response to high click rates: aging effects. , 2001, American journal of audiology.

[28]  G Moushegian,et al.  Laboratory note. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  K V Gopal,et al.  Slope analysis of Auditory Brainstem Responses in children at risk of central auditory processing disorders. , 1999, Scandinavian audiology.

[30]  D. Caspary,et al.  Frequency-following responses in primary auditory and reticular formation structures. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Raz,et al.  EEG spectra in dyslexic and normal readers during oral and silent reading. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  T. Carrell,et al.  Auditory Neurophysiologic Responses and Discrimination Deficits in Children with Learning Problems , 1996, Science.

[33]  A R Møller,et al.  Interpretation of brainstem auditory evoked potentials: results from intracranial recordings in humans. , 1983, Scandinavian audiology.

[34]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training , 1996, Science.

[35]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[36]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  D. Molfese Predicting Dyslexia at 8 Years of Age Using Neonatal Brain Responses , 2000, Brain and Language.

[38]  K. Hecox,et al.  Effect of broadband noise on the human brain stem auditory evoked response. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[39]  B. Shaywitz,et al.  Discrepancy Compared to Low Achievement Definitions of Reading Disability , 1992, Journal of learning disabilities.

[40]  John T. Jacobson,et al.  The Auditory brainstem response , 1985 .

[41]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Deficits in auditory brainstem pathway encoding of speech sounds in children with learning problems , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  J. Stein,et al.  Auditory temporal coding in dyslexia , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  A R Møller,et al.  Contribution from crossed and uncrossed brainstem structures to the brainstem auditory evoked potentials: A study in humans , 1995, The Laryngoscope.

[44]  J. Stein,et al.  The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. , 2001, Dyslexia.

[45]  J. Walton,et al.  Background noise improves gap detection in tonically inhibited inferior colliculus neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  H Pratt,et al.  Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  M. Ree,et al.  Tests of Cognitive Ability , 2005 .

[48]  D. Irvine Physiology of the Auditory Brainstem , 1992 .

[49]  James W. Hall Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses , 1991 .

[50]  M. Snowling From language to reading and dyslexia. , 2001, Dyslexia.

[51]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  The human frequency-following response (FFR): Normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brainstem response , 1992, Hearing Research.

[52]  S E Shaywitz,et al.  Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[53]  R. Burkard,et al.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  R. Burkard,et al.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  D L Jewett,et al.  Human Auditory Evoked Potentials: Possible Brain Stem Components Detected on the Scalp , 1970, Science.

[56]  L. Nolan,et al.  Biological psychology , 2019, An Introduction to the Psychology of Humor.

[57]  J. Jerger,et al.  Specific Auditory Perceptual Dysfunction in a Learning Disabled Child , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[58]  T D Carrell,et al.  Interactive software for evaluating auditory discrimination. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[59]  木下 洋 聴性脳幹反応(Auditory Brainstem Response:ABR)の新生児期への応用:第I編在胎週の差によるABR潜時の検討と基礎的事項 , 1983 .

[60]  A. Møller,et al.  Evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus in man. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[61]  G C Galbraith,et al.  Two-channel brain-stem frequency-following responses to pure tone and missing fundamental stimuli. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.