Extra-terra incognita: Martian maps in the digital age

Science and technology studies (STS) and critical cartography are both asking questions about the ontological fixity of maps and other scientific objects. This paper examines how a group of NASA computer scientists who call themselves The Mapmakers conceptualizes and creates maps in service of different commitments. The maps under construction are those of alien Mars, produced through partnerships that NASA has established with Google and Microsoft. With the goal of bringing an experience of Mars to as many people as possible, these maps influence how we imagine our neighbouring planet. This paper analyzes two attributes of the map, evident in both its representation and the attending cartographic practices: a sense of Mars as dynamic and a desire for a democratic experience of Mars in which up-to-date Mars data can be intuitively accessed not only by scientists but by lay users as well. Whereas a democratic Mars promises users the ability to decide how to interact with the map and understand Mars, dynamic Mars imposes a more singular sense of Mars as a target of continued robotic and maybe even human exploration. Because maps of Mars have a different (and arguably less complex) set of social and political commitments than those of Earth, they help us see how different goals contradict and complement each other in matters of exploration and state-craft relevant both to other worlds and our own.

[1]  J. Krygier,et al.  Rethinking the Power of Maps , 2010 .

[2]  Paul Kingsbury,et al.  Walter Benjamin's Dionysian Adventures on Google Earth , 2009 .

[3]  S. Helmreich From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures , 2014 .

[4]  Jason Farman,et al.  Mapping the digital empire: Google Earth and the process of postmodern cartography , 2010, New Media Soc..

[5]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Unfolding mapping practices: a new epistemology for cartography , 2013 .

[6]  D. Cosgrove Apollo's Eye: A Cartographic Genealogy of the Earth in the Western Imagination , 2001 .

[7]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth , 2009 .

[8]  S. Ramaswamy Catastrophic Cartographies: Mapping the Lost Continent of Lemuria , 1999 .

[9]  J. B. Harley,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP , 1989 .

[10]  Sergio Sismondo,et al.  Ontological turns, turnoffs and roundabouts , 2015, Social studies of science.

[11]  Carol R. Stoker,et al.  Habitability of the Phoenix landing site , 2010 .

[12]  L. Messeri Placing Outer Space: An Earthly Ethnography of Other Worlds , 2016 .

[13]  L. Daston Biographies of scientific objects , 2000 .

[14]  J. Urry The Tourist Gaze , 2002 .

[15]  M. Haklay Neogeography and the Delusion of Democratisation , 2013 .

[16]  A. Mol The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[17]  S. Woolgar,et al.  The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? , 2013 .

[18]  Matthew Henry Edney Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765-1843 , 1997 .

[19]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software , 2008 .

[20]  John Pickles,et al.  A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping and the Geo-Coded World , 2003 .

[21]  Georgia Bracey,et al.  Citizen Science: Status and Research Directions for the Coming Decade , 2009 .

[22]  J. Corner The Agency of Mapping: Speculation, Critique and Invention , 2011 .

[23]  S. Dick,et al.  The Living Universe: NASA and the Development of Astrobiology , 2000 .

[24]  C. W. Morris Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism , 1995 .

[25]  Robert Markley,et al.  Dying Planet: Mars in Science and the Imagination , 2005 .

[26]  J. Dittmer Colonialism and Place Creation in Mars Pathfinder Media Coverage , 2007 .

[27]  F. Macdonald Anti-Astropolitik — outer space and the orbit of geography , 2007 .

[28]  D. Valentine,et al.  Extreme: Limits and Horizons in the Once and Future Cosmos , 2012 .

[29]  Lisa Messeri,et al.  The Problem with Pluto , 2010 .

[30]  Donna Harawy Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[31]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[32]  John Law,et al.  The Actor-Enacted: Cumbrian Sheep in 2001 , 2008 .

[33]  Neil Jenkings,et al.  Seeing like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars , 2016 .

[34]  Richard P. Hallion,et al.  … the Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age by Walter A. McDougall (review) , 2023 .

[35]  P. Walsh The Power of Maps. , 1998 .

[36]  M. Dodge,et al.  The view from nowhere: spatial politics and cultural significance of high resolution satellite imagery , 2009 .

[37]  J. Silvertown A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  D. Dennis,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1998 .

[39]  J. Crampton Cartography: maps 2.0 , 2009 .

[40]  Stephen P. Hanna,et al.  Beyond The ‘Binaries’: A Methodological Intervention for Interrogating Maps as Representational Practices , 2005 .

[41]  K. Lane,et al.  Geographies of Mars: Seeing and Knowing the Red Planet , 2010 .

[42]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Thinking about maps , 2009 .

[43]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[44]  M. Hindman The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .

[45]  Cate Turk,et al.  Tracing contingencies: analyzing the political in assemblages of web 2.0 cartographies , 2013 .