Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996-2002.

BACKGROUND Increasing use of IVF in the USA has been a major contributor to the rising national multiple birth rate. Many have advocated that reducing the number of embryos transferred is essential for addressing the IVF-associated multiple birth problem. METHODS A population-based sample of 506 072 IVF transfers performed in the USA in 1996-2002 was used to investigate trends in embryo transfer practices and to determine whether any changes in practice patterns have impacted the multiple gestation risk associated with IVF. RESULTS The proportion of procedures in which >or=3 embryos were transferred declined significantly for most patient groups between 1996 and 2002. However, declines for some groups were not sizeable (from 79 to 73% and from 76 to 71% for fresh, non-donor procedures among women aged 38-40 and 41-42 years respectively) and transferring >or=3 embryos remained the norm for all groups. As of 2002, single embryo transfer had not increased for most groups and remained uncommon. Some declines in overall multiple gestation rates were observed, although multiple gestation risk associated with 2 embryos transferred increased significantly for all groups. CONCLUSIONS Despite changes in embryo transfer practices, multiple gestation risk remains high, in part due to increased multiple gestation rates associated with the transfer of two embryos.

[1]  J. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. , 2005, Human reproduction update.

[2]  M. S. Parker,et al.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States , 2002 , 2005 .

[3]  A. Pinborg,et al.  Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Tarun Jain,et al.  Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  L. Schieve,et al.  What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: challenges in measuring and reporting success rates for assisted reproductive technology treatments: what is optimal? , 2004, Human reproduction.

[6]  D. Mansour WHO recommendations , 2004, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[7]  D. Healy Damaged babies from assisted reproductive technologies: focus on the BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) outcome. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  D. Adamson,et al.  Multiple births from assisted reproductive technologies: a challenge that must be met. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  P. Crosignani ESHRE Capri Workshop Group , 2004 .

[10]  V. Maclachlan,et al.  What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[11]  L. Keith,et al.  Iatrogenic multiple pregnancies. Do they complicate perinatal care? , 2003, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[12]  L. Schieve,et al.  Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology? , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  Gary Jeng,et al.  Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[14]  R. Frydman,et al.  Infertility therapy-associated multiple pregnancies (births): an ongoing epidemic. , 2003, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[15]  J. Martin,et al.  Births : final data for 2006 , 2009 .

[16]  C. Hogue Successful assisted reproductive technology: the beauty of one. , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  J. Evers,et al.  Female subfertility , 2002, The Lancet.

[18]  L. Keith,et al.  Iatrogenic multiple pregnancy. , 2002, Seminars in neonatology : SN.

[19]  P. Pharoah,et al.  Neurological outcome in twins. , 2002, Seminars in neonatology : SN.

[20]  E. Vayena,et al.  Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction : report of a meeting on "Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction" held at WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, 17-21 September 2001 , 2002 .

[21]  L. Schieve,et al.  Risk of multiple birth associated with in vitro fertilization using donor eggs. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  Eshre Campus Course Report Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. ESHRE Campus Course Report. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[23]  P. McNamee,et al.  We are due for a correction...and we are working to achieve one. , 2001, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  C. Ananth,et al.  Medical and Economic Effects of Twin Gestations , 2000, The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI.

[25]  Luca Gianaroli,et al.  Multiple gestation pregnancy , 2000 .

[26]  J. A. Martin,et al.  Trends in twin and triplet births: 1980-97. , 1999, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[27]  J. Kiely,et al.  What is the population-based risk of preterm birth among twins and other multiples? , 1998, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  M. Senat,et al.  How does multiple pregnancy affect maternal mortality and morbidity? , 1998, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  R. Goldenberg,et al.  The Origin and Outcome of Preterm Twin Pregnancies , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  M. Sauer Assisted reproductive technology , 2018 .

[31]  W. Spellacy,et al.  A Case-Control Study of 1253 Twin Pregnancies From a 1982-1987 Perinatal Data Base , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.