Web popularity: an illusory perception of a qualitative order in information

Using a psychotechnological perspective, this study discusses the current model of information ranking by search engines, based on quantitative Web Popularity (WP), which binds users to a cognitive adaptation to the rank-system restrictions. This phenomenon gives rise to a “rich-get-richer” effect on the Web. This paper claims that such an effect could be limited or reversed by the introduction of quality factors in ranking, and addresses the case of accessibility as a fundamental such factor. A study is reported which, through introducing an accessibility factor in a well-known popularity ranking algorithm, demonstrates that this transformation allows a qualitative rearrangement, without modifying or weighing on the properties of the rank. The overall approach is grounded on two development factors: the analysis of accessibility through specific tools and the employment of this analysis within all components used to build up the ranking. The results show that it is important to reconsider WP as including not only on the number of inbound and outbound links of a website, but also on its level of accessibility for all users, and on users’ judgment of the website use as efficient, effective, and satisfactory.

[1]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[2]  Mark Fischetti,et al.  Weaving the Web : the past and present and future of the World Wide Web by its inventor , 2000 .

[3]  Lev N. Shchur,et al.  On the universality of rank distributions of website popularity , 2004, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[5]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[6]  Oreste Signore,et al.  A comprehensive model for Web sites quality , 2005, Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Web Site Evolution.

[7]  E GARFIELD,et al.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. , 2006, Science.

[8]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[9]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Prioritizing Web Usability , 2006 .

[10]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Checking an integrated model of web accessibility and usability evaluation for disabled people , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  A. Cawkell Science Citation Index , 1970, Nature.

[12]  Junghoo Cho,et al.  Impact of search engines on page popularity , 2004, WWW '04.

[13]  Sandeep Pandey,et al.  Shuffling a Stacked Deck: The Case for Partially Randomized Ranking of Search Engine Results , 2005, VLDB.

[14]  Bambang Parmanto,et al.  Evaluation of Web Accessibility of Consumer Health Information Websites , 2003, AMIA.

[15]  Junghoo Cho,et al.  Page quality: in search of an unbiased web ranking , 2005, SIGMOD '05.

[16]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Object-level ranking: bringing order to Web objects , 2005, WWW '05.

[17]  Benjamin P.-C. Yen,et al.  The design and evaluation of accessibility on web navigation , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  A Vespignani,et al.  Topical interests and the mitigation of search engine bias , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.