Do companies with greater deployment of participation systems use Visual Management more extensively? An exploratory study

One of the most important enablers of continuous improvement sustainability is ease of communication, and doing so in a way that can be understood by all employees and allows information to flow rapidly throughout the company. Visual Management (VM) provides significant benefits in communication and standardisation which boosts the effectiveness of improvement systems. This article presents an in-depth literature review about the concept of VM and its benefits, and provides results from an exploratory study carried out in the Basque Country that aims to ascertain the usage of VM in 52 companies. Based on a literature review, 20 different VM elements were identified for improving the workplace. The implementation of these elements was studied, as was the relationship of VM with employee participation systems. The results of this study show a general moderate implementation of VM tools in companies with implementation levels differing according to company size. Some of the lowest scores are detected in the areas of visual control of quality, the displaying of indicators and process visibility. Moreover, statistical differences were identified between the implementation of suggestion systems and improvement teams and the implementation level of VM tools.

[1]  John R. Shook,et al.  Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and , 1998 .

[2]  Edward G. Schilling,et al.  Juran's Quality Handbook , 1998 .

[3]  Alan Davies,et al.  JIT—Factory Revolution , 1990 .

[4]  Paul G. Ranky,et al.  Eighteen “monozukuri‐focused” assembly line design and visual factory management principles with DENSO industrial examples , 2007 .

[5]  Joseph G. Voelkel,et al.  Guide to Quality Control , 1982 .

[6]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[7]  D. E. Koulouriotis,et al.  Visual factory: Basic principles and the 'zoning' approach , 2002 .

[8]  E. Bell,et al.  Visual Management Studies: Empirical and Theoretical Approaches , 2013 .

[9]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools , 2003 .

[10]  Michael Beer,et al.  Why Total Quality Management Programs Do Not Persist: The Role of Management Quality and Implications for Leading a TQM Transformation , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[11]  Nadia Bhuiyan,et al.  A sustainable continuous improvement methodology at an aerospace company , 2006 .

[12]  Pascal Dennis,et al.  Lean Production Simplified : A Plain-Language Guide to the World's Most Powerful Production System , 2002 .

[13]  Chong Tek Aik,et al.  The synergies of the learning organization, visual factory management, and on-the-job training , 2005 .

[14]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[15]  Joe Stenzel.  Lean accounting : best practices for sustainable integration , 2012 .

[16]  Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza,et al.  Implementation of Lean‐Kaizen in the human resource service process , 2010 .

[17]  Hiroshi Katayama,et al.  A study on construction of a kaizen case-base and its utilisation: a case of visual management in fabrication and assembly shop-floors , 2010 .

[18]  Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park,et al.  Lean-kaizen public service: an empirical approach in Spanish local governments , 2009 .

[19]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Organizational Excellence: Achieving world-class performance , 1999 .

[20]  Glenn Parry,et al.  Application of lean visual process management tools , 2006 .

[21]  T. Melton,et al.  The Benefits of Lean Manufacturing: What Lean Thinking has to Offer the Process Industries , 2005 .

[22]  Michel Greif,et al.  The Visual Factory: Building Participation Through Shared Information , 1991 .

[23]  Braden R. Kattman,et al.  Visual workplace practices positively impact business processes , 2012 .

[24]  Alan Stainer,et al.  Visual communications – the Japanese experience , 2000 .

[25]  Samuel K.M. Ho.  5‐S practice: a new tool for industrial management , 1998 .

[26]  Nick Rich,et al.  Companies’ perceptions of inhibitors and enablers for process improvement activities , 2003 .

[27]  Production M Anagement.  Adaptive Configuration of a Lean Production System in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises , 2010 .

[28]  長田 貴,et al.  The 5S's : five keys to a total quality environment , 1991 .

[29]  Chandandeep Grewal,et al.  An initiative to implement lean manufacturing using value stream mapping in a small company , 2008, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[30]  Iwao Kobayashi.  20 Keys to Workplace Improvement , 1995 .

[31]  Hiroshi Katayama,et al.  Development of Kaizen case-base for effective technology transfer–a case of visual management technology , 2010 .

[32]  M. T. Hides,et al.  Factors affecting successful implementation of total productive maintenance , 1999 .

[33]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Visual management – A general overview , 2009 .

[34]  Kaoru Kobayashi,et al.  Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: an integrated management system , 2008 .

[35]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[36]  Jennie Andersson Schaeffer,et al.  Spatial design for continuous improvement: The case study of three manufacturing companies , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[37]  Tony Lingham,et al.  Kaizen within Kaizen Teams: Continuous and Process Improvements in a Spanish municipality , 2008 .

[38]  Matthew W. Rohrer.  Seeing is believing: the importance of visualization in manufacturing simulation , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[39]  Thimo Zahn,et al.  Adaptive Configuration of a Lean Production System in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises , 2010, Prod. Eng..

[40]  Celeste P.M. Wilderom,et al.  Kaizen and culture: on the transferability of Japanese suggestion systems , 1998 .

[41]  Steve New,et al.  Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study , 2003 .

[42]  Per Nikolaj Bukh.  Økonomistyring på den slanke måde: Anmeldelse af "Lean Accounting: Best Practice for sustainable integration, Joe Stenzel (ed.), John Wiley & Sons" , 2007 .

[43]  Stewart Liff,et al.  Seeing is believing : how the new art of visual management can boost performance throughout your organization , 2004 .

[44]  R. Dorf,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action , 1997, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[45]  Rodney Peter Gapp,et al.  Business improvement strategy or useful tool? Analysis of the application of the 5S concept in Japan, the UK and the US , 2008 .

[46]  Valeria Belvedere,et al.  District's manufacturing performances: A comparison among large, small-to-medium-sized and district enterprises , 2006 .

[47]  S. Derammelaere,et al.  A method to align a manufacturing execution system with Lean objectives , 2011 .

[48]  Mageshni Narain.  Show not tell , 2013 .

[49]  今井 正明,et al.  Kaizen (Ky'zen) : the key to Japan's competitive success , 1986 .

[50]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance , 2003 .

[51]  Ander Errasti,et al.  Lean thinking with improvement teams in retail distribution: a case study , 2012 .

[52]  Chiun-Ming Liu,et al.  Systematic Lean Techniques for Improving Honeycomb Bonding Process , 2009 .

[53]  Pius Achanga,et al.  Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs , 2006 .

[54]  Hiroshi Katayama,et al.  A study of the performance evaluation of the visual management case-base: development of an integrated model by quantification theory category III and AHP , 2013 .

[55]  K. N. Anand.  The master chart: A potent and simple tool for continuous improvement , 1996 .

[56]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[57]  John Bessant,et al.  An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour , 2001 .