Toward a Consensus on Applying Quantitative Liquid Chromatography‐Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomics in Translational Pharmacology Research: A White Paper

Quantitative translation of information on drug absorption, disposition, receptor engagement, and drug–drug interactions from bench to bedside requires models informed by physiological parameters that link in vitro studies to in vivo outcomes. To predict in vivo outcomes, biochemical data from experimental systems are routinely scaled using protein quantity in these systems and relevant tissues. Although several laboratories have generated useful quantitative proteomic data using state‐of‐the‐art mass spectrometry, no harmonized guidelines exit for sample analysis and data integration to in vivo translation practices. To address this gap, a workshop was held on September 27 and 28, 2018, in Cambridge, MA, with 100 experts attending from academia, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulators. Various aspects of quantitative proteomics and its applications in translational pharmacology were debated. A summary of discussions and best practices identified by this expert panel are presented in this “White Paper” alongside unresolved issues that were outlined for future debates.

[1]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Skyline: an Open Source Document Editor for Creating and Analyzing Targeted Proteomics Experiments , 2022 .

[2]  Matthias Mann,et al.  BoxCar acquisition method enables single-shot proteomics at a depth of 10,000 proteins in 100 minutes , 2018, Nature Methods.

[3]  M. Mann,et al.  Extensive quantitative remodeling of the proteome between normal colon tissue and adenocarcinoma , 2012, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  T. Pearson,et al.  High precision quantification of human plasma proteins using the automated SISCAPA Immuno-MS workflow. , 2016, New biotechnology.

[5]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  C. Booth,et al.  Magnitude of clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved based on single-arm trials (SAT) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  Peter Willett,et al.  What is a tutorial , 2013 .

[8]  L. Benet,et al.  The Presence of a Transporter-Induced Protein Binding Shift: A New Explanation for Protein-Facilitated Uptake and Improvement for In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation , 2019, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[9]  Tetsuya Terasaki,et al.  Simultaneous absolute quantification of 11 cytochrome P450 isoforms in human liver microsomes by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with in silico target peptide selection. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[10]  Li Wang,et al.  Transporter Expression in Liver Tissue from Subjects with Alcoholic or Hepatitis C Cirrhosis Quantified by Targeted Quantitative Proteomics , 2016, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[11]  D. Tibboel,et al.  Proteomics of human liver membrane transporters: a focus on fetuses and newborn infants , 2018, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[12]  Susan E. Abbatiello,et al.  Targeted Peptide Measurements in Biology and Medicine: Best Practices for Mass Spectrometry-based Assay Development Using a Fit-for-Purpose Approach* , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  R. Subramanian,et al.  Comparison of information-dependent acquisition, SWATH, and MS(All) techniques in metabolite identification study employing ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Data‐independent acquisition‐based SWATH‐MS for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial , 2018, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  K. Knights,et al.  Scaling factors for the in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IV-IVE) of renal drug and xenobiotic glucuronidation clearance. , 2016, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[16]  Bhagwat Prasad,et al.  Critical Issues and Optimized Practices in Quantification of Protein Abundance Level to Determine Interindividual Variability in DMET Proteins by LC‐MS/MS Proteomics , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[17]  J. Connolly Comparative Cost Analysis , 1967, Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[18]  J. Unadkat,et al.  Optimized Approaches for Quantification of Drug Transporters in Tissues and Cells by MRM Proteomics , 2014, The AAPS Journal.

[19]  W. Humphreys,et al.  Abundance of Phase 1 and 2 Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Alcoholic and Hepatitis C Cirrhotic Livers: A Quantitative Targeted Proteomics Study , 2018, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[20]  T. Goosen,et al.  Data Generated by Quantitative Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Are Only the Start and Not the Endpoint: Optimization of Quantitative Concatemer-Based Measurement of Hepatic Uridine-5′-Diphosphate–Glucuronosyltransferase Enzymes with Reference to Catalytic Activity , 2018, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[21]  G. Warhurst,et al.  In Vitro–In Vivo Extrapolation Scaling Factors for Intestinal P-Glycoprotein and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein: Part I: A Cross-Laboratory Comparison of Transporter-Protein Abundances and Relative Expression Factors in Human Intestine and Caco-2 Cells , 2016, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[22]  T. Terasaki,et al.  Modulation and compensation of the mRNA expression of energy related transporters in the brain of glucose transporter 1-deficient mice. , 2006, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[23]  M. Mann,et al.  Exponentially Modified Protein Abundance Index (emPAI) for Estimation of Absolute Protein Amount in Proteomics by the Number of Sequenced Peptides per Protein*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  R. Evers,et al.  Interindividual Variability in Hepatic Organic Anion-Transporting Polypeptides and P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1) Protein Expression: Quantification by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectroscopy and Influence of Genotype, Age, and Sex , 2014, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[25]  Issam Zineh,et al.  Quantitative Systems Pharmacology: A Regulatory Perspective on Translation , 2019, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[26]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Hepatic Uptake of Atorvastatin: Influence of Variability in Transporter Expression on Uptake Clearance and Drug-Drug Interactions , 2014, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[27]  G. Warhurst,et al.  Lost in Centrifugation: Accounting for Transporter Protein Losses in Quantitative Targeted Absolute Proteomics , 2014, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[28]  P. Ciborowski,et al.  Pressure-assisted sample preparation for proteomic analysis. , 2013, Analytical biochemistry.

[29]  J. Backman,et al.  Implications of intercorrelation between hepatic CYP3A4‐CYP2C8 enzymes for the evaluation of drug–drug interactions: a case study with repaglinide , 2018, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[30]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  In-depth quantitative analysis and comparison of the human hepatocyte and hepatoma cell line HepG2 proteomes. , 2016, Journal of proteomics.

[31]  Amin Rostami-Hodjegan,et al.  In Vitro–In Vivo Extrapolation Scaling Factors for Intestinal P-glycoprotein and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein: Part II. The Impact of Cross-Laboratory Variations of Intestinal Transporter Relative Expression Factors on Predicted Drug Disposition , 2016, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[32]  S. Heyward,et al.  A Comparison of Total and Plasma Membrane Abundance of Transporters in Suspended, Plated, Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes Versus Human Liver Tissue Using Quantitative Targeted Proteomics and Cell Surface Biotinylation , 2019, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[33]  T. Goosen,et al.  Quantitative Characterization of Major Hepatic UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Enzymes in Human Liver Microsomes: Comparison of Two Proteomic Methods and Correlation with Catalytic Activity , 2017, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[34]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  A “Proteomic Ruler” for Protein Copy Number and Concentration Estimation without Spike-in Standards* , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[35]  Yingying Guo,et al.  Ethnic Variability in the Expression of Hepatic Drug Transporters: Absolute Quantification by an Optimized Targeted Quantitative Proteomic Approach , 2015, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[36]  Kuresh Youdim,et al.  Reaction Phenotyping: Advances in the Experimental Strategies Used to Characterize the Contribution of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes , 2015, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[37]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Human Liver Tissue and Isolated Hepatocytes with a Focus on Proteins Determining Drug Exposure. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[38]  M. Mann,et al.  Proteome, phosphoproteome, and N-glycoproteome are quantitatively preserved in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue and analyzable by high-resolution mass spectrometry. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[39]  D. Martins‐de‐Souza,et al.  A Guide to Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantitative Proteomics. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[40]  M. Reuss,et al.  Indirect protein quantification of drug-transforming enzymes using peptide group-specific immunoaffinity enrichment and mass spectrometry , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[41]  S. Heyward,et al.  Targeted LC-MS/MS Proteomics-Based Strategy To Characterize in Vitro Models Used in Drug Metabolism and Transport Studies. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[42]  A. Rostami-Hodjegan,et al.  Global Proteomic Analysis of Human Liver Microsomes: Rapid Characterization and Quantification of Hepatic Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes , 2017, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[43]  R. Aebersold,et al.  mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments , 2011, Nature Methods.

[44]  C. Eyers,et al.  The power of ion mobility-mass spectrometry for structural characterization and the study of conformational dynamics. , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[45]  Laura L. Elo,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of popular proteomics software workflows for label-free proteome quantification and imputation , 2017, Briefings Bioinform..

[46]  X. Chu,et al.  Ontogeny of Hepatic Drug Transporters as Quantified by LC‐MS/MS Proteomics , 2016, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[47]  J. Wiśniewski Label-Free and Standard-Free Absolute Quantitative Proteomics Using the "Total Protein" and "Proteomic Ruler" Approaches. , 2017, Methods in enzymology.

[48]  Hendrik Neubert,et al.  Targeted quantitative proteomics for the analysis of 14 UGT1As and -2Bs in human liver using NanoUPLC-MS/MS with selected reaction monitoring. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[49]  Jeffrey R. Whiteaker,et al.  Optimized Protocol for Quantitative Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Analysis of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[50]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Panorama: A Targeted Proteomics Knowledge Base , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[51]  M. Ostrowski,et al.  Protein Abundance of Clinically Relevant Drug Transporters in the Human Liver and Intestine: A Comparative Analysis in Paired Tissue Specimens , 2019, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[52]  Juan Antonio Vizcaíno,et al.  How to submit MS proteomics data to ProteomeXchange via the PRIDE database , 2014, Proteomics.

[53]  Bhagwat Prasad,et al.  Age-Dependent Absolute Abundance of Hepatic Carboxylesterases (CES1 and CES2) by LC-MS/MS Proteomics: Application to PBPK Modeling of Oseltamivir In Vivo Pharmacokinetics in Infants , 2017, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[54]  A. D. Rodrigues,et al.  Comparison of Proteomic Quantification Approaches for Hepatic Drug Transporters: Multiplexed Global Quantitation Correlates with Targeted Proteomic Quantitation , 2018, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[55]  Wooin Lee,et al.  The N‐terminal region of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B3 (OATP1B3) plays an essential role in regulating its plasma membrane trafficking , 2017, Biochemical pharmacology.

[56]  Yuan Chen,et al.  Strategies of Drug Transporter Quantitation by LC-MS: Importance of Peptide Selection and Digestion Efficiency , 2017, The AAPS Journal.

[57]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[58]  Y. Lai,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the contribution of sodium‐dependent taurocholate co‐transporting polypeptide (NTCP) to the hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin, pitavastatin and fluvastatin , 2013, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition.

[59]  Jashvant D. Unadkat,et al.  Successful Prediction of In Vivo Hepatobiliary Clearances and Hepatic Concentrations of Rosuvastatin Using Sandwich-Cultured Rat Hepatocytes, Transporter-Expressing Cell Lines, and Quantitative Proteomics , 2018, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[60]  M. Mann,et al.  Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells , 2014, Nature Methods.

[61]  M. Vrana,et al.  The Promises of Quantitative Proteomics in Precision Medicine. , 2017, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[62]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  A simple approach for restoration of differentiation and function in cryopreserved human hepatocytes , 2019, Archives of Toxicology.

[63]  Jill Barber,et al.  Expression of Hepatic Drug-Metabolizing Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Their Intercorrelations: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[64]  M. Ostrowski,et al.  Protein abundance of clinically relevant multidrug transporters along the entire length of the human intestine. , 2014, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[65]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Subcellular fractionation of human liver reveals limits in global proteomic quantification from isolated fractions. , 2016, Analytical biochemistry.

[66]  A. Rostami-Hodjegan,et al.  Ten years of QconCATs: Application of multiplexed quantification to small medically relevant proteomes , 2015 .

[67]  A. Rostami-Hodjegan,et al.  GASP and FASP are Complementary for LC–MS/MS Proteomic Analysis of Drug‐Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters in Pig Liver , 2018, Proteomics.

[68]  C. Heidecke,et al.  Absolute protein quantification of clinically relevant cytochrome P450 enzymes and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases by mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics. , 2014, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[69]  J. Unadkat,et al.  Optimization and Application of a Biotinylation Method for Quantification of Plasma Membrane Expression of Transporters in Cells , 2017, The AAPS Journal.

[70]  Tetsuya Terasaki,et al.  Quantitative Atlas of Membrane Transporter Proteins: Development and Application of a Highly Sensitive Simultaneous LC/MS/MS Method Combined with Novel In-silico Peptide Selection Criteria , 2008, Pharmaceutical Research.

[71]  Ben C. Collins,et al.  Quantitative proteomics: challenges and opportunities in basic and applied research , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[72]  A. Rostami-Hodjegan,et al.  Alternative fusion protein strategies to express recalcitrant QconCAT proteins for quantitative proteomics of human drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[73]  Christopher S. Hughes,et al.  Extending the Compatibility of the SP3 Paramagnetic Bead Processing Approach for Proteomics. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[74]  R. Harrington Part II , 2004 .

[75]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Fast and sensitive total protein and Peptide assays for proteomic analysis. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[76]  C. Wolf,et al.  A Targeted in Vivo SILAC Approach for Quantification of Drug Metabolism Enzymes: Regulation by the Constitutive Androstane Receptor , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[77]  I. Turko,et al.  Natural flanking sequences for peptides included in a quantification concatamer internal standard. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[78]  Aleksandra Galetin,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Expression of Hepatic Organic Anion–Transporting Polypeptide (OATP) Transporters in Cellular Systems Relative to Human Liver Tissue , 2015, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[79]  S. Gygi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[80]  Daniel C. Liebler,et al.  Equivalence of Protein Inventories Obtained from Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded and Frozen Tissue in Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Shotgun Proteomic Analysis* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[81]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Consecutive proteolytic digestion in an enzyme reactor increases depth of proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[82]  S. Gaskell,et al.  Quantification of the proteins of the bacterial ribosome using QconCAT technology. , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[83]  J. Unadkat,et al.  The Importance of Incorporating OCT2 Plasma Membrane Expression and Membrane Potential in IVIVE of Metformin Renal Secretory Clearance , 2018, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[84]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  CPTAC Assay Portal: a repository of targeted proteomic assays , 2014, Nature Methods.

[85]  M. Mann,et al.  A practical recipe for stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[86]  Susan E. Abbatiello,et al.  New Guidelines for Publication of Manuscripts Describing Development and Application of Targeted Mass Spectrometry Measurements of Peptides and Proteins , 2017, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[87]  A. Rostami-Hodjegan,et al.  Choice of LC-MS Methods for the Absolute Quantification of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters in Human Tissue: a Comparative Cost Analysis , 2015, The AAPS Journal.

[88]  M. Mann,et al.  Super-SILAC mix for quantitative proteomics of human tumor tissue , 2010, Nature Methods.

[89]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Multiple-Enzyme-Digestion Strategy Improves Accuracy and Sensitivity of Label- and Standard-Free Absolute Quantification to a Level That Is Achievable by Analysis with Stable Isotope-Labeled Standard Spiking. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[90]  U. Broeckel,et al.  Age‐ and Genotype‐Dependent Variability in the Protein Abundance and Activity of Six Major Uridine Diphosphate‐Glucuronosyltransferases in Human Liver , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[91]  M. Mann,et al.  Large-scale Proteomic Analysis of the Human Spliceosome References , 2006 .

[92]  M. Mann,et al.  Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. , 2011, Annual review of biochemistry.

[93]  M. Ostrowski,et al.  Protein Abundance of Clinically Relevant Drug‐Metabolizing Enzymes in the Human Liver and Intestine: A Comparative Analysis in Paired Tissue Specimens , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[94]  Response to "Determining Allele-Specific Protein Expression (ASPE) Using a Novel Quantitative Concatamer Based Proteomics Method". , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[95]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Loss-less Nano-fractionator for High Sensitivity, High Coverage Proteomics * , 2017, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[96]  Markus Müller,et al.  Processing strategies and software solutions for data‐independent acquisition in mass spectrometry , 2015, Proteomics.

[97]  Stefan Tenzer,et al.  Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST Protocols for Proteomic Sample Preparation in the Low Microgram Range. , 2017, Journal of proteome research.

[98]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[99]  A. Rostami-Hodjegan,et al.  Simultaneous Quantification of the Abundance of Several Cytochrome P450 and Uridine 5′-Diphospho-Glucuronosyltransferase Enzymes in Human Liver Microsomes Using Multiplexed Targeted Proteomics , 2014, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[100]  A. Nesvizhskii,et al.  Determining Allele-Specific Protein Expression (ASPE) Using a Novel Quantitative Concatamer Based Proteomics Method. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[101]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Variability in Mass Spectrometry-based Quantification of Clinically Relevant Drug Transporters and Drug Metabolizing Enzymes. , 2017, Molecular pharmaceutics.