Reason based solutions and the complexity of distribution network design problems

Abstract Distribution network strategy, which defines the number, location, and market area of distribution facilities is an important component of a firm's overall business strategy. While there have been considerable advances in optimization algorithms for solving distribution system design problems, they have not kept pace with the complexity of the problem facing managers. Consequently, non-optimizing methods such as scenario evaluation, which rely on human problem structuring and cognitive abilities, are frequently used to design distribution networks. This research experimentally examines the relationships between human problem solving performance and problem characteristics of typical distribution network design problems. In addition, associations between human attributes and problem solving performance are explored. The results of a laboratory study indicate that several problem characteristics affect analyst performance. Problem size is the dominant factor. Analysts' spatial reasoning abilities, education and experiences are also significantly associated with problem solving performance. Future research needs in this area are discussed.

[1]  T. E. Block Note---A Note on “Comparison of Computer Algorithms and Visual Based Methods for Plant Layout” by M. Scriabin and R. C. Vergin , 1977 .

[2]  E. Powell Robinson,et al.  Designing an Integrated Distribution System at DowBrands, Inc , 1993 .

[3]  W. E. Pracht,et al.  The Effects of an Interactive Graphics‐Based DSS to Support Problem Structuring , 1988 .

[4]  A. M. Geoffrion,et al.  Multicommodity Distribution System Design by Benders Decomposition , 1974 .

[5]  Ronald H. Ballou,et al.  A SURVEY OF COMMERCIAL-GRADE WAREHOUSE LOCATION MODELS. , 1991 .

[6]  James A. Fitzsimmons,et al.  A Warehouse Location Model Helps Texas Comptroller Select Out-of-State Audit Offices , 1983 .

[7]  Willy Herroelen,et al.  On the use of flow dominance in complexity measures for facility layout problems , 1985 .

[8]  C. H. Aikens,et al.  Facility location models for distribution planning , 1985 .

[9]  Arthur V. Hill,et al.  An experimental comparison of human schedulers and heuristic algorithms for the traveling salesman problem , 1982 .

[10]  B. K. Blaylock,et al.  COGNITIVE STYLE AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION , 1984 .

[11]  Roger C. Vergin,et al.  Comparison of Computer Algorithms and Visual Based Methods for Plant Layout , 1975 .

[12]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[13]  M. G. McGee,et al.  Human spatial abilities: Sources of sex differences , 1979 .

[14]  I. Benbasat,et al.  Individual-Differences In The Use Of Decision Support Aids , 1982 .

[15]  Patrick D. Krolak,et al.  A Man-Machine Approach Toward Solving the Generalized Truck-Dispatching Problem , 1972 .

[16]  Paul Barrington Taylor,et al.  Intuitive versus optimal solutions to some problems in distribution , 1980 .

[17]  H. A. Witkin A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[18]  Elwood S. Buffa,et al.  The Facilities Layout Problem in Perspective , 1966 .

[19]  R. Zmud INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Impact of Cognitive Styles on Information System Design , 1978, MIS Q..

[21]  T. E. Block Note---On the Complexity of Facilities Layout Problems , 1979 .

[22]  Thomas L. Ward,et al.  Computer-aided facility location , 1986 .

[23]  J. Krarup,et al.  The simple plant location problem: Survey and synthesis , 1983 .

[24]  L. D. Hopkins,et al.  Humans vs. Computer Algorithms for the Plant Layout Problem , 1980 .

[25]  E. Lusk Cognitive Aspects Of Annual Reports - Field Independence-Dependence , 1973 .

[26]  E. Powell Robinson,et al.  A dual-based optimization procedure for the two-echelon uncapacitated facility location problem , 1992 .

[27]  Donald Erlenkotter,et al.  A Dual-Based Procedure for Uncapacitated Facility Location , 1978, Oper. Res..