Building Quality of Life and Social Cohesion at Ucanha During the Terminal Preclassic

Late Preclassic life in the Northern Maya Lowlands is a period of material and social experimentation, a balancing act between emerging social differentiation and an ideology of communal integration. During this period, the site of Ucanha was physically integrated into a micropolity via an 18-km-long roadway and experienced the creation of integrative civic spaces, a population apogee, and an influx of ceramic heterogeneity. Followers donated labor to build a monumental landscape, and incipient rulers provided an array of aesthetically pleasing ceramics and social events that helped forge collective trust. Ceramic distributions and the widespread use of megalithic architecture indicate a high quality of life for households. A built landscape that references a place of creation and stucco friezes and architecture attest to emergent claims of hereditary rulership and community prosperity. Evidence from Ucanha’s central plaza indicate this area was more-widely accessed during the Late Preclassic but then became more restricted to the general public during the Early Classic. Likewise, during the Early Classic, the distribution of decorated ceramics became more circumscribed, indicating economic changes that favored gifting elites rather than provisioning the populace. During this period architecture associated with elite rulership was interred and households were abandoned. Thus, around the time of broader integration during the Late Preclassic, political institutions provided for all; yet, during the Early Classic, elites turned from an inclusive, community strategy towards a more exclusionary strategy of reinforcing an elite identity. As a result, leaders lost the support of their constituents and populations declined.

[1]  R. Wilk,et al.  Household Archaeology , 1982, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[2]  Scott R. Hutson,et al.  Uci and Izamal: Influence and Interaction in the Northern Maya Lowlands , 2018 .

[3]  Adrian S Z Chase RESIDENTIAL INEQUALITY AMONG THE ANCIENT MAYA : OPERATIONALIZING HOUSEHOLD ARCHITECTURAL VOLUME AT CARACOL , BELIZE , 2017 .

[4]  Johannes Müller,et al.  Using the Capability Approach to Conceptualise Inequality in Archaeology: the Case of the Late Neolithic Bosnian Site Okolište c. 5200–4600 bce , 2016 .

[5]  Scott R. Hutson The Ancient Urban Maya: Neighborhoods, Inequality, and Built Form , 2016 .

[6]  Scott R. Hutson,et al.  2 How Material Culture Acted on the Ancient Maya of Yucatan, Mexico , 2015 .

[7]  Damien B. Marken,et al.  Introducing Maya Polities: Models and Definitions , 2015 .

[8]  Scott R. Hutson,et al.  SACRED LANDSCAPES AND BUILDING PRACTICES AT UCI, KANCAB, AND UCANHA, YUCATAN, MEXICO , 2014, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[9]  T. Pauketat The tragedy of the commoners , 2014 .

[10]  Andrew K. Scherer,et al.  Territory, Trust, Growth, and Collapse in Classic Period Maya Kingdoms , 2013, Current Anthropology.

[11]  Michael E. Smith,et al.  Neighborhoods and Districts in Ancient Mesoamerica , 2012 .

[12]  David S. Anderson XTOBO, YUCATAN, MEXICO, AND THE EMERGENT PRECLASSIC OF THE NORTHERN MAYA LOWLANDS , 2011, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[13]  Séverine Deneulin,et al.  The capability approach and the politics of a social conception of wellbeing , 2010 .

[14]  T. Stanton,et al.  Assessing the Role of Preclassic Traditions in the Formation of Early Classic Yucatec Cultures, México , 2010 .

[15]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  Wealth Transmission and Inequality among Hunter‐Gatherers , 2010, Current Anthropology.

[16]  J. Normark The Triadic Causeways of Ichmul: Virtual Highways Becoming Actual Roads , 2008, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[17]  C. Isendahl Comments on Takeshi Inomata: Plazas, Performers, and Spectators: Political Theaters of the Classic Maya , 2006 .

[18]  Jennifer P. Mathews,et al.  Late Formative and Early Classic Interaction Spheres Reflected in the Megalithic Styles , 2006 .

[19]  T. Stanton,et al.  Placing the Centre, Centring the Place: the Influence of Formative Sacbeob in Classic Site Design at Yaxuná, Yucatán , 2005, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[20]  Susan M. Alt,et al.  Agency in a Postmold? Physicality and the Archaeology of Culture-Making , 2005 .

[21]  Jennifer P. Mathews,et al.  MODELS OF COSMIC ORDER: Physical expression of sacred space among the ancient Maya , 2004, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[22]  M. Turshen Development as Freedom , 2001 .

[23]  L. M. Cámara Los mayas de Yucatán. Entre las colinas y el estero , 1999 .

[24]  Elizabeth M. Brumfiel,et al.  Factional competition and political development in the New World: INTRODUCTION , 1994 .

[25]  C. Baudez Fash, W. L. — Scribes, Warriors and Kings. The City of Copán and the Ancient Maya. , 1992 .

[26]  Michael B. Schiffer,et al.  Archaeological Method and Theory , 1991 .

[27]  Michael E. Smith Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: Implications for archaeology , 1987 .

[28]  J. Justeson The Foreign impact on lowland Mayan language and script , 1986 .

[29]  R. Netting Some Home Truths on Household Size and Wealth , 1982 .

[30]  G. Feinman,et al.  The Production Step Measure: An Ordinal Index of Labor Input in Ceramic Manufacture , 1981, American Antiquity.

[31]  Edward B. Kurjack,et al.  Early Boundary Maintenance in Northwest Yucatan, Mexico , 1976, American Antiquity.

[32]  J. Hendon Community and House Solidarity among the Maya of Southeastern Mesoamerica , 2022 .