Planning and carrying out investigations: an entry to learning and to teacher professional development around NGSS science and engineering practices

The shift from science inquiry to science practices as recommended in the US reports A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas and the Next Generation Science Standards has implications for classroom/school level instruction and assessment practices and, therefore, for teacher’s professional development. We explore some of these implications and the nuances of adopting a practice orientation for science education through the lens of one NGSS practice ‘Planning and Carrying Out Investigations’ (PCOI). We argue that a focus on any one practice must necessarily consider embracing a ‘suite of practices’ approach to guide in the design of the curriculum, instruction, assessment, and evaluation. We introduce the 5D model as a curriculum and instruction framework (1) to examine how unpacking PCOI can help teachers bridge to other less-familiar-to-teachers NGSS practices and (2) to help capture the ‘struggle’ of doing science by problematizing and unpacking for students the 5D component elements of measurement and observation.1. Deciding what and how to measure, observe, and sample;2. Developing or selecting procedures/tools to measure and collect data;3. Documenting and systematically recording results and observations;4. Devising representations for structuring data and patterns of observations; and5. Determining if (1) the data are good (valid and reliable) and can be used as evidence, (2) additional or new data are needed, or (3) a new investigation design or set of measurements are needed.Our hypothesis is that the 5D model provides struggle type experiences for students to acquire not only conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge but also to attain desired ‘knowledge problematic’ images of the nature of science. Additionally, we further contend that PCOI is a more familiar professional development context for teachers wherein the 5D approach can help bridge the gap between the less familiar and the more complex practices such as building and refining models and explanations.

[1]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Teaching scientific inquiry : recommendations for research and implementation , 2008 .

[2]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists: A report on the HOSG instruction project , 1963 .

[3]  Laura Wenk,et al.  Relations among three aspects of first-year college students' epistemologies of science , 2006 .

[4]  William F. McComas,et al.  The nature of science in science education : rationales and strategies , 1998 .

[5]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Investigating Real Data in the Classroom: Expanding Children's Understanding of Math and Science. Ways of Knowing in Science and Mathematics Series. , 2002 .

[6]  Ngss Lead States Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[7]  James B. Conant,et al.  Science and Common Sense. , 1952 .

[8]  David Stroupe,et al.  Proposing a Core Set of Instructional Practices and Tools for Teachers of Science , 2012 .

[9]  J. Conant,et al.  On understanding science; an historical approach. , 1947, American scientist.

[10]  P. Moss Evidence and decision making , 2007 .

[11]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[12]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  America's lab report : investigations in high school science , 2006 .

[13]  Janet F. Carlson,et al.  The relative effects and equity of inquiry‐based and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation , 2009 .

[14]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Engaging Students in the Scientific Practices of Explanation and Argumentation: Understanding a Framework for K-12 Science Education , 2012 .

[15]  Drew H. Gitomer,et al.  Establishing multilevel coherence in assessment , 2007 .

[16]  Amelia Wenk Gotwals,et al.  Validity Evidence for Learning Progression‐Based Assessment Items That Fuse Core Disciplinary Ideas and Science Practices , 2013 .

[17]  W. McComas Benchmarks for Science Literacy , 2014 .

[18]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[19]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[20]  Ginette Delandshere,et al.  Assessment as Inquiry. , 2002 .

[21]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Language and Literacy in Science Education , 2001 .

[22]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[23]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[24]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[25]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry , 2008 .

[26]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[27]  R. Duschl Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .

[28]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  Ambitious Pedagogy by Novice Teachers: Who Benefits from Tool-Supported Collaborative Inquiry into Practice and Why? , 2011 .

[29]  R. Duschl The Second Dimension-Crosscutting Concepts: Understanding a Framework for K-12 Science Education , 2012 .

[30]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Revising Instruction to Teach Nature of Science. , 2004 .

[31]  Jerry Wellington,et al.  America's lab report: Investigations in high school science , 2007 .

[32]  R. Duschl,et al.  Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms. , 1997 .

[33]  Janet F. Carlson,et al.  An Efficacy Trial of Research-Based Curriculum Materials With Curriculum-Based Professional Development , 2015 .

[34]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Engaging Students in Scientific Practices: What Does Constructing and Revising Models Look like in the Science Classroom? Understanding a Framework for K-12 Science Education , 2012 .

[35]  Lawrence B. Flick,et al.  Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science , 2004 .

[36]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[37]  L. Schauble,et al.  Inventing Data Structures for Representational Purposes: Elementary Grade Students' Classification Models , 2000 .

[38]  Shaw-Jing Chao,et al.  The Effects of Physical Materials on Kindergartners' Learning of Number Concepts , 2000 .

[39]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[40]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[41]  R. Sawyer The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[42]  Mary Ratcliffe,et al.  What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community , 2003 .

[43]  Ben Kelcey,et al.  How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity , 2009 .

[44]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[45]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[46]  R. Hackett Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[47]  Michael Ford,et al.  ‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding , 2008 .

[48]  Jerome Bruner A short history of psychological theories of learning , 2004, Daedalus.