The Maturation of Interference Suppression and Response Inhibition: ERP Analysis of a Cued Go/Nogo Task

Inhibitory control is a core function that allows us to resist interference from our surroundings and to stop an ongoing action. To date, it is not clear whether inhibitory control is a single process or whether it is composed of different processes. Further, whether these processes are separate or clustered in childhood is under debate. In this study, we investigated the existence and development of two hypothesized component processes of inhibitory control–interference suppression and response inhibition–using a single task and event related potential components. Twenty 8-year-old children and seventeen adults performed a spatially cued Go/Nogo task while their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography. Mean N2 amplitudes confirmed the expected pattern for response inhibition with both the children and the adults showing more negative N2 for Nogo vs. Go trials. The interference suppression N2 effect was only present in adults and appeared as a more negative N2 in response to Go trials with a congruent cue than Go trials with an incongruent cue. Contrary to previous findings, there was no evidence that the interference suppression N2 effect was later occurring than the response inhibition N2 effect. Overall, response inhibition was present in both the children and the adults whereas interference suppression was only present in the adults. These results provide evidence of distinct maturational processes for both component processes of inhibitory control, with interference suppression probably continuing to develop into late childhood.

[1]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[3]  G. Logan.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[4]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M. Coles.  Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[7]  G. Logan,et al.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  E. Jodo,et al.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[10]  E. Schröger.  Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli following transient shifts of spatial attention in a Go/Nogo task , 1993, Biological Psychology.

[11]  B. Kopp,et al.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  F. Karayanidis,et al.  Evidence of visual processing negativity with attention to orientation and color in central space. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Redondo,et al.  On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[14]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[15]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  J. Nigg.  On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[18]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children Evidence from fMRI , 2002, Neuron.

[19]  G. Band,et al.  Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition , 2003, Psychological research.

[20]  A. Miyake,et al.  The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[22]  T. Paus.  Mapping brain maturation and cognitive development during adolescence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Cheryl L. Dickter,et al.  Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[24]  J. Sergeant,et al.  The Stroop revisited: a meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD. , 2005, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[25]  R. Barry,et al.  Development of Inhibitory Processing During the Go/NoGo Task: A Behavioral and Event-Related Potenti , 2005 .

[26]  B. Pennington,et al.  Validity of the Executive Function Theory of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[27]  Conor V. Dolan,et al.  Source (or Part of the following Source): Type Article Title Age-related Change in Executive Function: Developmental Trends and a Latent Variable Analysis Author(s) Age-related Change in Executive Function: Developmental Trends and a Latent Variable Analysis , 2022 .

[28]  Philip David Zelazo,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive control in childhood and adolescence: Disentangling the contributions of age and executive function , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  S. Bunge,et al.  Neurodevelopmental changes in working memory and cognitive control , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Robert J. Barry,et al.  Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: The N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  L. Jonkman,et al.  The developmental pattern of stimulus and response interference in a color-object Stroop task: an ERP study , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[33]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: An ERP study , 2008, Brain Research.

[34]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Dénes Szücs,et al.  Real-time Tracking of Motor Response Activation and Response Competition in a Stroop Task in Young Children: A Lateralized Readiness Potential Study , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Dénes Szücs,et al.  Motor conflict in Stroop tasks: Direct evidence from single-trial electro-myography and electro-encephalography , 2009, NeuroImage.

[37]  J. Duncan.  The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  P. H. Miller,et al.  A developmental perspective on executive function. , 2010, Child development.

[39]  H. Leuthold,et al.  Parallel processing in face perception. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  W. Sommer,et al.  Processing Interrogative Sentence Mood at the Semantic-Syntactic Interface: An Electrophysiological Research in Chinese, German, and Polish , 2010, PloS one.

[41]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Different Inhibitory Mechanisms When Stopping or Changing a Planned Response , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Functional definition of the N450 event-related brain potential marker of conflict processing: a numerical stroop study , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[43]  S. Wiens,et al.  Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[44]  Dénes Szücs,et al.  The development of inhibitory control: An averaged and single-trial Lateralized Readiness Potential study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[45]  Janette L. Smith,et al.  Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  T. Braver.  The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Kimberly L. Ray,et al.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions , 2012, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[48]  Christopher R. Brydges,et al.  Dissociable Components of Cognitive Control: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study of Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression , 2012, PloS one.

[49]  Mike Anderson,et al.  Maturation of Cognitive Control: Delineating Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  Ian Marshall,et al.  Imaging Conditioned Fear Circuitry Using Awake Rodent fMRI , 2013, PloS one.

[51]  V. Csépe,et al.  Children With ADHD Show Impairments in Multiple Stages of Information Processing in a Stroop Task: An ERP Study , 2015, Developmental neuropsychology.