What is Neologicism?

Logicism is a thesis about the foundations of mathematics, roughly, that mathematics is derivable from logic alone. It is now widely accepted that the thesis is false and that the logicist program of the early 20th century was unsuccessful. Frege's [1893/1903] system was inconsistent and the Whitehead and Russell [1910–1913] system was not thought to be logic, given its axioms of infinity, reducibility, and choice. Moreover, both forms of logicism are in some sense non-starters, since each asserts the existence of objects (courses of values, propositional functions, etc.), something which many philosophers think logic is not supposed to do. Indeed, the tension in the idea underlying logicism, that the axioms and theorems of mathematics can be derived as theorems of logic, is obvious: on the one hand, there are numerous existence claims among the theorems of mathematics, while on the other, it is thought to be impossible to prove the existence of anything from logic alone. According to one well-received view, logicism was replaced by a very different account of the foundations of mathematics, in which mathematics was seen as the study of axioms and their consequences in models consisting of the sets described by Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF). Mathematics, on this view, is just applied set theory.

[1]  Roy T. Cook,et al.  Abstraction and Identity , 2005 .

[2]  J. MacFarlane Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism , 2002 .

[3]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Foundations Without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic. , 1994 .

[4]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  The Philosophy of Mathematics: , 2019, The Mathematical Imagination.

[5]  Bob Hale,et al.  The Reason's Proper Study , 2001 .

[6]  Wilfried Sieg,et al.  Hilbert's Programs: 1917–1922 , 1999, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.

[7]  U. BLAU,et al.  ABSTRACT OBJECTS , 1981 .

[8]  Lok Sang Ho,et al.  The state of the economy , 1989 .

[9]  Richard G. Heck On The Consistency of Second-Order Contextual Definitions , 1992 .

[10]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Philosophy of mathematics : selected readings , 1984 .

[11]  Michael Dummett,et al.  Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. , 1993 .

[12]  G. Frege Grundgesetze der Arithmetik , 1893 .

[13]  Bernard Linsky,et al.  IN DEFENSE OF THE SIMPLEST QUANTIFIED MODAL LOGIC , 1994 .

[14]  Bob Hale Real Numbers, Quantities, and Measurement , 2002 .

[15]  K. Jon Barwise,et al.  On branching quantifiers in English , 1979, J. Philos. Log..

[16]  Alan Weir,et al.  Neo-Fregeanism: An Embarrassment of Riches , 2003, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[17]  Roy T. Cook Iteration One More Time , 2003, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[18]  Alexander George Mathematics and mind , 1994 .

[19]  Warren D. Goldfarb First-Order Frege Theory is Undecidable , 2001, J. Philos. Log..

[20]  Crispin Wright,et al.  Frege's conception of numbers as objects , 1984 .

[21]  Pieter A. M. Seuren Logic, language and thought , 2003 .

[22]  Edward N. Zalta,et al.  Frege, Boolos, and Logical Objects , 2004, J. Philos. Log..

[23]  Vadim Batitsky Some Measurement-Theoretic Concerns about Hale's ‘Reals by Abstraction'; , 2002 .

[24]  George Boolos Is Hume’s Principle Analytic? , 2007 .

[25]  John L. Bell,et al.  Fregean Extensions of First-Order Theories , 1994, Math. Log. Q..

[26]  Bernard Linsky Was the Axiom of Reducibility a Principle of Logic , 1990 .

[27]  O Linnebo Review: Kit Fine: The Limits of Abstraction , 2004 .

[28]  John P. Burgess,et al.  Book Review: Kit Fine. The Limits of Abstraction , 2003, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[29]  Harold T. Hodes Where Do Sets Come From? , 1991, J. Symb. Log..

[30]  John P. Burgess,et al.  On a Consistent Subsystem of Frege's Grundgesetze , 1998, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[31]  Paul Benacerraf Frege: The Last Logicist1 , 1981 .

[32]  William Kneale,et al.  The development of logic , 1963 .

[33]  Howard K. Wettstein,et al.  Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Truth and its Deformities , 2008 .

[34]  Glenn Kessler,et al.  Mathematics and Modality , 1978 .

[35]  Martha Kneale,et al.  The development of logic , 1963 .

[36]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  New V, ZF, and Abstraction , 1999 .

[37]  Richard G. Heck Jnr The Consistency of predicative fragments of frege’s grundgesetze der arithmetik , 1996 .

[38]  C. Hempel On the Nature of Mathematical Truth , 1945 .

[39]  George Boolos,et al.  Logic, Logic, and Logic , 2000 .

[40]  George Boolos,et al.  IX—Saving Frege from Contradiction , 1987 .

[41]  Roy T. Cook,et al.  The limits of abstraction , 2004 .

[42]  Harold T. Hodes Logicism and the Ontological Commitments of Arithmetic , 1984 .

[43]  Edward N. Zalta,et al.  Natural Numbers and Natural Cardinals as Abstract Objects: A Partial Reconstruction of Frege"s Grundgesetze in Object Theory , 1999, J. Philos. Log..

[44]  Edward N. Zalta,et al.  Neo-Logicism? An Ontological Reduction of Mathematics to Metaphysics , 2000 .

[45]  Roy T. Cook,et al.  Kit fine: The limits of abstraction , 2004 .

[46]  Roy T. Cook,et al.  The limits of abstraction , 2004 .

[47]  Bernard Linsky,et al.  Naturalized platonism versus platonized naturalism , 1995 .

[48]  Paul Benacerraf,et al.  Philosophy of mathematics: What numbers could not be , 1965 .

[49]  TERENCE PARSONS On the consistency of the first-order portion of Frege's logical system , 1987, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[50]  Neil Tennant,et al.  A General Theory of Abstraction Operators , 2004 .

[51]  Alfred Tarski,et al.  Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen , 1935 .

[52]  Stewart Shapiro Foundations of Mathematics: Metaphysics, Epistemology, Structure , 2004 .

[53]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  New Foundations for Mathematical Logic , 1937 .

[54]  Hartry Field,et al.  Realism, Mathematics, and Modality , 1989 .

[55]  J. Floyd,et al.  Future pasts : the analytic tradition in twentieth-century philosophy , 2001 .

[56]  Peter Schroeder-Heister A model-theoretic reconstruction of Frege's permutation argument , 1987, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[57]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Philosophy of Logic. , 1988 .

[58]  J. Etchemendy The Concept of Logical Consequence , 1991 .

[59]  J. E. Tiles,et al.  Frege's Conception of Numbers as Objects , 1984 .

[60]  Per Martin-Löf,et al.  Intuitionistic type theory , 1984, Studies in proof theory.

[61]  Fernando Ferreira,et al.  On the Consistency of the Δ11-CA Fragment of Frege's Grundgesetze , 2002, J. Philos. Log..

[62]  Kai Frederick Wehmeier,et al.  Consistent Fragments of Grundgesetze and the Existence of Non-Logical Objects , 1999, Synthese.

[63]  W. V. Quine,et al.  Logic based on inclusion and abstraction , 1937, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[64]  Bob Hale,et al.  Reals by Abstractiont , 2000 .

[65]  S. Shapiro Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic , 1994 .

[66]  William Demopoulos,et al.  Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics , 1997 .