Robustness assessment approaches for steel framed structures under catastrophic events

The current study deals with the robustness assessment methods of steel framed buildings under catastrophic events. Two steel framed buildings, designed according to old and new seismic Italian codes, have been herein analysed, by considering the uncertainties of both the material strength and the applied loads, through two investigation methods.First, within the methodologies used for robustness assessment under seismic loads, a deterministic method, framed within the Performance Based Seismic Design (PBSD), has been applied.Later on, the robustness of studied structures under different column-removed conditions, related to different catastrophic events (blast, impact, fire and so on), has been assessed by means of two force-based analysis techniques (a literature approach and a more advanced procedure) in order to estimate their resistance against progressive collapse.The application of the two methods has allowed to calculate the robustness index of examined structures, by taking into account the influence of both the catenary effect phenomenon and different beam-to-column joints, with the final aim to show their behavioural difference in terms of robustness.

[1]  David I Blockley,et al.  Structural vulnerability, reliability and risk , 2002 .

[2]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Seismic Damage Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Structures After The Abruzzo 2009 Earthquake: The Case Study of the Historical Centers of L'Aquila and Castelvecchio Subequo , 2013 .

[3]  A. Formisano.  Progressive Collapse and Robustness of Steel Framed Structures , 2012 .

[4]  Michael Beer,et al.  Designing robust structures - A nonlinear simulation based approach , 2008 .

[5]  Philippe Bouillard,et al.  Progressive Collapse: Comparison of Main Standards, Formulation and Validation of New Computational Procedures , 2008 .

[6]  Barry Hilary Valentine Topping,et al.  Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Structures Technology , 2012 .

[7]  Gary F. Panariello,et al.  Study of Mitigation Strategies for Progressive Collapse of a Reinforced Concrete Commercial Building , 2006 .

[8]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas , 2014 .

[9]  Uwe Starossek,et al.  Progressive Collapse of Structures: Nomenclature and Procedures , 2006 .

[10]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Urban habitat constructions under catastrophic events , 2008 .

[11]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Innovative Strategies for Structural Protection of Built Heritage - PRIN 2005 , 2010 .

[12]  A Formisano,et al.  Robustness based design of new and existing steel structures , 2009 .

[13]  N. Null.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[14]  Donald O. Dusenberry,et al.  Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildings | NIST , 2007 .

[15]  Dimitris Diamantidis,et al.  The Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS) Probabilistic Model Code for New and Existing Structures , 1999 .

[16]  Meng-Hao Tsai,et al.  Investigation of progressive collapse resistance and inelastic response for an earthquake-resistant RC building subjected to column failure , 2008 .