Identification of infants with major cognitive delay using parental report

Aim  The collection of data on longer‐term neurodevelopmental outcomes within large neonatal randomized controlled trials by trained assessors can greatly increase costs and present many operational difficulties. The aim of this study was to develop a more practical alternative for identifying major cognitive delay in infants at the age of 24 months, based on parental reports.

[1]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Outcome monitoring in preterm populations: Measures and methods , 2015 .

[2]  A. Jefferies.  Postnatal corticosteroids to treat or prevent chronic lung disease in preterm infants. , 2012, Paediatrics & child health.

[3]  N. Bayley.  Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition , 2012 .

[4]  B. Farrell,et al.  Treatment of neonatal sepsis with intravenous immune globulin. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  B. Schmidt,et al.  NeOProM: Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration study protocol , 2011, BMC pediatrics.

[6]  Gehan Roberts,et al.  Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. , 2010, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[7]  A. Salt,et al.  The INIS Study. International Neonatal Immunotherapy Study: non-specific intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for suspected or proven neonatal sepsis: an international, placebo controlled, multicentre randomised trial , 2008, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[8]  N. Marlow,et al.  Developmental assessment of preterm infants at 2 years: validity of parent reports , 2008, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  Craig A. Albers,et al.  Test Review: Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development– Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment , 2007 .

[10]  N. Marlow,et al.  Randomised trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation in babies of gestational age 28 weeks or less: respiratory and neurological outcomes at 2 years , 2006, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[11]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: Hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[12]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Developmental screen or developmental testing? , 2006, Early human development.

[13]  A. Salt,et al.  Neurodevelopmental follow-up after preterm birth: follow up after two years. , 2006, Early human development.

[14]  A. LaCroix,et al.  Risk Factors Associated with Acute Pyelonephritis in Healthy Women , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  N. Marlow,et al.  Validation of a parent report measure of cognitive development in very preterm infants , 2004, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[16]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? , 2003, JAMA.

[17]  Bill Allen,et al.  Book Review: Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition: Manual , 2000 .

[18]  M. Rutter,et al.  The validity of parent-based assessment of the cognitive abilities of 2-year-olds , 1998 .

[19]  A. Johnson.  Follow up studies: a case for a standard minimum data set , 1997, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[20]  G. Torrance,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of the health status of extremely low birth weight children at eight years of age: comparison with a reference group. , 1994, The Journal of pediatrics.

[21]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[22]  Nancy Bayley,et al.  BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT AND TODDLER DEVELOPMENT, THIRD EDITION (BAYLEY-III) , 2014 .