Field Studies Using a Recombinant Mycoinsecticide (Metarhizium anisopliae) Reveal that It Is Rhizosphere Competent

ABSTRACT In the summer of 2000, we released genetically altered insect-pathogenic fungi onto a plot of cabbages at a field site on the Upper Marlboro Research Station, Md. The transformed derivatives of Metarhizium anisopliae ARSEF 1080, designated GPMa and GMa, carried the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein (gfp) gene alone (GMa) or with additional protease genes (Pr1) (GPMa). The study (i) confirmed the utility of gfp for monitoring pathogen strains in field populations over time, (ii) demonstrated little dissemination of transgenic strains and produced no evidence of transmission by nontarget insects, (iii) found that recombinant fungi were genetically stable over 1 year under field conditions, and (iv) determined that deployment of the transgenic strains did not depress the culturable indigenous fungal microflora. The major point of the study was to monitor the fate (survivorship) of transformants under field conditions. In nonrhizosphere soil, the amount of GMa decreased from 105 propagules/g at depths of 0 to 2 cm to 103 propagules/g after several months. However, the densities of GMa remained at 105 propagules/g in the inner rhizosphere, demonstrating that rhizospheric soils are a potential reservoir for M. anisopliae. These results place a sharp focus on the biology of the soil/root interphase as a site where plants, insects, and pathogens interact to determine fungal biocontrol efficacy, cycling, and survival. However, the rhizospheric effect was less marked for GPMa, and overall it showed reduced persistence in soils than did GMa.

[1]  T. Nicolson,et al.  The Rhizosphere and Plant Growth , 2012, Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research.

[2]  J. Whipps,et al.  Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. , 2001, Journal of experimental botany.

[3]  Nobuhiro Suzuki,et al.  Essential and Dispensable Virus-Encoded Replication Elements Revealed by Efforts To Develop Hypoviruses as Gene Expression Vectors , 2000, Journal of Virology.

[4]  R. S. St. Leger,et al.  Construction of an improved mycoinsecticide overexpressing a toxic protease. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Bidochka,et al.  Co-transformation of Metarhizium anisopliae by electroporation or using the gene gun to produce stable GUS transformants , 1995 .

[6]  G. F. Leatham,et al.  Frontiers in Industrial Mycology , 1993 .

[7]  R. Staples,et al.  Genetic differences in allozymes and in formation of infection structures among isolates of the entomopathogenic fungus , 1992 .

[8]  R. Staples,et al.  Pathogenicity and growth of Metarhizium anisopliae stably transformed to benomyl resistance , 1990, Current Genetics.

[9]  N. Magan,et al.  Introduction - fungal biological control agents: progress, problems and potential. , 2001 .

[10]  J. Gressel,et al.  Enhancing biocontrol agents and handling risks. , 2001 .

[11]  N. Magan,et al.  Monitoring the fate of biocontrol fungi. , 2001 .

[12]  D. L. Johnson,et al.  Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[13]  N. Magan,et al.  Prospects for strain improvement of fungal pathogens of insects and weeds. , 2001 .

[14]  L. Lacey,et al.  Field Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology , 2000, Springer Netherlands.

[15]  L. Lacey Manual of techniques in insect pathology , 1997 .

[16]  M. Goettel,et al.  Chapter V-3 – Fungi: Hyphomycetes , 1997 .

[17]  C. Mundi Models from plant pathology on the movement and fate of new genotypes of microorganisms in the environment. , 1995, Annual review of phytopathology.

[18]  D. Roberts,et al.  Entomopathogenic Fungi as Bioinsecticides , 1992 .

[19]  J. Parke Root colonization by indigenous and introduced microorganisms , 1991 .

[20]  G. Wittig 17 – Techniques in Insect Pathology , 1963 .