Evaluation of Satisfaction Using Online Learning with Interactivity

Abstract Online learning provides a potential for new research environmental to make it easier to enter into contracts with other students during the review process is done. The main purpose of this study was to ascertain the influence of student satisfaction in online learning uum. A total of 113 students of masters coursework in Information Communication And Technology (ICT) and Information Technology (IT) course have been made respondents in the study and data were collected through online questionnaires. This research use a CMCIT theory for evaluate the students’ satisfaction in effectiveness and efficiency. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. This study examined the extent of respondents’ satisfaction related concepts and types of evaluation of online learning. The study also showed that only two types of evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of student satisfaction using interactivity in online learning. Overall, the majority of respondents would give satisfaction through efficiency and effectiveness of online learning because they really use ict in their learning.

[1]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Michael A. West,et al.  Handbook of Work Group Psychology , 1996 .

[3]  Kenneth J. Chang,et al.  213 A Randomized, Multicenter, Sham-Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Subjects with Barrett's Esophagus (Be) Containing Dysplasia: Interim Results of the Aim Dysplasia Trial , 2008 .

[4]  Angela D. Benson,et al.  Using Online Learning To Meet Workforce Demand: A Case Study of Stakeholder Influence. , 2002 .

[5]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1999 .

[6]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 3 – Generations of User Interfaces , 1993 .

[7]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Network Community: An Introduction to Networks in the 19 Global Village , 1999 .

[8]  E. Wagner.  Interactivity: From Agents to Outcomes. , 1997 .

[9]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[10]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. , 2007 .

[11]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? , 2000, CHI.

[12]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Usability - Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation , 1991, Interact. Comput..

[13]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[14]  Penny Silvers,et al.  Strategies for Creating Community in a Graduate Education Online Program , 2007 .

[15]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[16]  Dianne L. Conrad,et al.  Deep in the Hearts of Learners: Insights into the Nature of Online Community , 2002 .

[17]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Human factors for informatics usability , 1991 .

[18]  Teresa Roselli,et al.  An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[19]  E. Rogers,et al.  Research methods and the new media , 1988 .

[20]  Chris Dede,et al.  The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning , 1996 .

[21]  J. McGrath.  Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .