Les figures de la gestion du changement sociotechnique

Computers and software occupy an ever bigger place in an organization’s activities. Studying the social dynamics of their uses has thus become a major preoccupation for the social sciences. An overview of recent studies, in particular “structurationist” research, on this subject is presented; and a federative model, suggested. This archetypical model corresponds to three stylized situations of sociotechnical change (a neutral, regenerated and disturbed archetype) that, in some cases, can be aligned to reconstitute “appropriative trajectories”. This theoretical framework is applied to various sorts of information technology, in particular: enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, intranets and electronic messaging systems. Beyond merely understanding the social dynamics, the effort is

[1]  J. Piaget,et al.  LA NAISSANCE DE L'INTELLIGENCE CHEZ L'INFANT , 1939 .

[2]  J. Piaget,et al.  La psychologie de l'intelligence , 1949 .

[3]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[4]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[5]  E. Trist,et al.  Towards A Social Ecology , 1973, Springer US.

[6]  G. R. Ferris,et al.  Social Facilitation: A Review and Alternative Conceptual Model , 1978 .

[7]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[8]  J. Rockart.  Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[9]  J. Rockart.  The changing role of the information systems executive : a critical success factors perspective , 1982 .

[10]  W. Pasmore,et al.  Sociotechnical Systems: A North American Reflection on Empirical Studies of the Seventies , 1982 .

[11]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Future Role of the Information Systems Executive , 1982, MIS Q..

[12]  Joel K. Leidecker,et al.  Identifying and using critical success factors , 1984 .

[13]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  SIM Competition Paper: Critical Success Factor Analysis as a Methodology for MIS Planning , 1985, MIS Q..

[15]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[16]  Systèmes d'Information dans l'Organisation : approche interprétative : études de cas dans les cliniques , 1987 .

[17]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[18]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Post implementation evaluation of computer-based information systems: current practices , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[19]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[20]  Tim Lincoln,et al.  Managing Information Systems for Profit , 1990 .

[21]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[22]  J. Post,et al.  Social Entrepreneurs and Catalytic Change. , 1991 .

[23]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[24]  Joellen Killion,et al.  The Zen of Facilitation. , 1992 .

[25]  Michel Weil,et al.  Le management stratégique , 1992 .

[26]  Marshall Scott,et al.  Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[27]  Eric Thompson,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Organizational Choice: Sociotechnical System Approach , 1992 .

[28]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[29]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Information systems strategy formation and implementation: The case of a central government agency , 1993 .

[30]  Brad M. Jackson,et al.  Interpretive analysis of team use of group technologies , 1993 .

[31]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[32]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[33]  Pat Fung,et al.  Constructing the Networked Organization: Content and Context in the Development of Electronic Communications , 1995 .

[34]  T. Bentley,et al.  Facilitation: Providing Opportunities for Learning , 1995 .

[35]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[36]  Manoj Hastak,et al.  Facilitating and inhibiting effects of brand cues on recall, consideration set, and choice , 1996 .

[37]  Claudio U. Ciborra.  Deconstructing the concept of strategic alignment , 1997 .

[38]  Fred Niederman.  Facilitating computer-supported meetings: an exploratory comparison of U.S. and Mexican facilitators , 1997 .

[39]  Werner Ketelhöhn,et al.  What is a key success factor , 1998 .

[40]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Facilitator Influence in Group Support Systems: Intended and Unintended Effects , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  K. Wei,et al.  Effects of facilitation and leadership on meeting outcomes in a group support system environment , 1999 .

[42]  Françàis-Xavier De Vaujany.  Stylisation de l'appropriation individuelle des technologies Internet à partir de la TSA , 1999 .

[43]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  A theory of information systems based on improvisation , 1999 .

[44]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  The facilitators perspective on meetings and implications for group support systems design , 1999, DATB.

[45]  Limites structurelles et culturelles à l'usage de la messagerie dans les banques à réseau , 2000 .

[46]  John Mingers,et al.  The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[47]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[48]  P. Kirk,et al.  The politics of facilitation , 2000 .

[49]  L'ordinateur, outil de travail et bien culturel , 2000 .

[50]  F. D. Vaujany.  Usages d'un intranet et processus de structuration de l'organisation , 2000 .

[51]  Les progiciels de gestion intégrée : une technologie structurante ? , 2000 .

[52]  S. Newell,et al.  From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: contradictory outcomes of intranet development , 2001 .

[53]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[54]  W. Gregory,et al.  Critical Facilitation: Learning through Intervention in Group Processes , 2001 .

[55]  Martine Carbonel,et al.  Dérives organisationnellesdans les projets ERP :les cas de Guerbet et Gaumont , 2001 .

[56]  Susan S. Raines,et al.  Lessons Learned from Two Decades of Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs and Processes at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , 2001 .

[57]  F. D. Vaujany.  American and European social embeddedness in IS research: the case of structurational approaches , 2001 .

[58]  Philip J. Dobson.  Critical realism and information systems research: why bother with philosophy? , 2002, Inf. Res..

[59]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success factors , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Jong‐Young Kim,et al.  Social Interaction in Computer‐Mediated Communication , 2005 .